Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

In praise of Jaws.

One film by Spielberg which often gets overlooked because of the huge success of Jaws is his first theatrical feature The Sugerland Express, a comedy drama based on fact. It's one of my favourite films of his.
 
I've never seen that.
Duel was done before Jaws wasn't it? For the telly. And he probably directed a few Quincey or Columbo episodes or summat.
BTW I quite liked 1941 AND Hook :o:
 
Duel is great. Spielberg got to make The Sugerland Express on the strenght of that because it also involved car chases.

I don't care for Hook, but I quite like 1941. It doesn't make me laugh, but it's quite a spectacular film to look at.

He made another TV movie after Duel, a so-so haunted house film called Something Evil and he directed one of the best ever Colombo episodes.
 
Orang Utan said:
Has anyone seen Always?
And no one's mentioned Empire Of The Sun either, which I thought was rather good

I think Always is among Spielbergs worst films. Empire of the Sun is fantastic for the first 45 minutes, but then it trails off and becomes a bit monotonous once it moves to the POW camp. There is nothing there I haven't seen before in other POW films and the camp looks too much like a stage set.
 
I loved Empire Of The Sun. My dad took me to see it at the Prince Charles cinema; it was the last film I saw at the pictures that had an interval (not that there have been that many, the only other one I can remember was Amadeus).

But then, I do rate Spielberg. I watched ET the other day and was completely transported, again :)
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
We'll have to agree to disagree.:)

The "You can hardly have been expected tolstoy" line of defence is always a poor one for shoddy big budget films. Indiana Jones is not Tolstoy, Bond is not Tolstoy, Back to the Future is not Tolstoy, Gremlins is not Tolstoy, Die Hard is not Tolstoy, but they are well made films (OK not all the Bonds but you get my drift).

Good is good and bad is bad, regardless of whether we're talking about an obscure polish black and white arthouse film or a hollywood blockbuster.
 
RenegadeDog said:
The "You can hardly have been expected tolstoy" line of defence is always a poor one for shoddy big budget films. Indiana Jones is not Tolstoy, Bond is not Tolstoy, Back to the Future is not Tolstoy, Gremlins is not Tolstoy, Die Hard is not Tolstoy, but they are well made films (OK not all the Bonds but you get my drift).

Good is good and bad is bad, regardless of whether we're talking about an obscure polish black and white arthouse film or a hollywood blockbuster.

No, Gremlins is a stinking pile of shit.:D
 
As a lover (not in the physical sense) of sharks I think Jaws was pretty poor. As a film lover I think it is one of the best I've seen for creating tension.
 
I don't think it's scary in the 90s horror movie kind of way - it doesn't make me jump. It's the atmoshpheric scariness of The Shining and the Blair Witch Project.
 
Reno said:
You really have a bee in your bonnet about this one.

No, I think Gremlins is ok as what it was: a kids movie. It amazes me that a whole group of people have invested it with some sort of deeper sociological meaning, that just ain't there.

'Lets put a gremlin in a blender! In a microwave!'

Ha ha!

Mildly amusing, but that's it.
 
One of my favourite films. Used to play JAWS in the classroom, before the teacher got in. AKA walking around on the desks and benches, avoiding the floor (sea) quoting bits from the film.

Watched it last summer and got a bit obsessed about sharks again.
 
Back
Top Bottom