ZAMB said:
Only a very small proportion of that land was 'legally bought' - the rest was seized by ethnic cleansing. Not really that complicated.
To paraphrase a friend of mine...
A good deal of palestinians who fled the fighting were not allowed to return home and were neither compensated for their loss nor resettled by the countries they fled to (who preferred to keep them in squalid camps as a political weapon).
360,000-711,000 palestinians fled (UN estimates).
and right after the war in 1948, the arab countries like egypt, jordan, syria, the two yemens, etc. began kicking out jews who had lived there for millenia, approximately 758,000-900,000 (UN estimates again).
so there you have it. each side can claim a horror story of displacement.
but let's also put this in perspective.
in 1922, for example, greece and turkey "exchanged" populations to the tune of several million each. the community of greeks in turkey, at least 3,000 years old, was now gone. the community of turks in greence, several hundreds of years old, was gone as well.
in 1945 as many as 3 million ethnic germans were expelled from czechosovakia, poland, yugoslavia, hungary and romania. hundreds of thousands were killed. while this was ostensibly as punishment for nazi excesses, there was no effort to determine which germans were collaborators and which were not, nor were any of them allowed to leave with any possessions and all had to give up rights to land, etc. thus the german presence in central europe, many hundreds of years old, ended in one of the largest--and largely forgotten--instances of ethnic cleansing.
so what's my point? israel was indeed created with SOME ethnic cleansing, but not just its own, also that of its neighbors. in historical perspective, there are worse instances, thus neither the ethnic cleansing of israel nor of its arab neighbors deserves the ridiculous attention it gets at the expense of every other issue in the world.