Discussion in 'Compendium Of Kerrrr-azy Conspiracies' started by Citizen66, Aug 15, 2008.
Why didn't they just hide some weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify that war there?
Went over-budget with 9/11?
Way too simple/logical/unexciting/boring. Can't be true.
But surely it would be easier to 'find' weapons of mass destruction? I'm surprised they didn't do that.
Cos they managed to persuade the general public they had WMD's anyway?
Better to fool them and have no WMD's or trace of you planting them isn't it?
But now look like liars...
This'll go well ...
At 10000% profit, I'm in there ...
soory db popcorns been banned to middle class
Really?? Who is really questioning it?
Doesn't look like many people to me, looks like they got away with it.
Weird, some board glitch seems to be suddenly bumping threads from 2003....
Precisely. Of course they have. My point being why would they have gone to the trouble of organising 9/11 and the deaths of all those civillians when they can just 'get away with it'...
It's one for the theorists to mull over.
Why's this in UK politics anyway?
Anyway it's been discussed to death already, so I'll shuffle it off to the Kooky Konspiracy forum presently.
Yeah I suppose it has. Shuffle away.
Separate names with a comma.