their time will come, then those fucking 'tree surgeons' will get theirs.butchersapron said:What like intelligent trees and that? I welcome that scenario.
their time will come, then those fucking 'tree surgeons' will get theirs.butchersapron said:What like intelligent trees and that? I welcome that scenario.
They cut out transportation? How do they do that then?DoUsAFavour said:Ever heard of those strange things called farmers markets that cut out transportation across continents, cuts out waste of middle men and profiteers?
kropotkin said:One trick pony ---> meat grinder
butchersapron said:Stop it! My envoroment is changing! Help me someone.

Sure, but do they still function if capitalism just stopped working? Most farmers I know are miserable gits. They rather let their produce rot than give it away for some sort of revolutionary labour cheque.DoUsAFavour said:Ever heard of those strange things called farmers markets that cut out transportation across continents, cuts out waste of middle men and profiteers?
butchersapron said:Stop it! My enviroment is changing! Help me someone.
Pickmans Model said:They cut out transportation? How do they do that then?
You can have a perfectly sensible conversation with a tree if you smoke enough fly agaric.kropotkin said:their time will come, then those fucking 'tree surgeons' will get theirs.
Yep, see above. It's called capitalism. Rationalisation. Redundancy. etcDoUsAFavour said:Relatively, should I add.
Bernie Gunther said:Most farmers I know are miserable gits.
If you were 15 years younger you'd know how scary that can be.kropotkin said:Die biped! Your time has passed, the Time of the Trees is here!
Bow before the Thousand Fern Reich
I've done a very rough calculation and worked out that if everyone was on the same income all round the world everyone would get about £70/week, which if IIRC is also the current average in Brazil and Russia.blackadder said:If what RW says is correct, then there would be enough money to share with the needy. I think it is piss poor that we have to have charities for things that the goverment should be paying for.
Bernie Gunther said:Most farmers I know are miserable gits. They rather let their produce rot than give it away for some sort of revolutionary labour cheque.
What figures did you use and why?TeeJay said:I've done a very rough calculation and worked out that if everyone was on the same income all round the world everyone would get about £70/week, which if IIRC is also the current average in Brazil and Russia.
Edit: these weren't the figures I used but just to illustrate the general idea:
![]()
Again through BG, looking at it as a one off event and then having to deal with it isn't the best way to approach this. No significant shift can happen without the question being addressed, and by defintion those people involved in agricultural production will be involved. If they're not, then there's problems.Bernie Gunther said:Sure Isambard, but this isn't one of those things you can leave until later. You have to sort it out right there and then, otherwise people go hungry and welcome the capitalists back in, sure as anything.
Bernie Gunther said:You have to sort it out right there and then.
It was a while ago and I think I used UN figures. Why did I use them? Mainly because they the first ones I found that I could use to do the calculation I wanted to do. This wasn't some PhD - it was something I did for an hour or so last year sometime.butchersapron said:What figures did you use and why?
Well yes, except that you're presumably doing this simultaneously with various environmental crises, where the only viable answer may well involve increasing the amount of human labour in food production.butchersapron said:Again through BG, looking at it as a one off event and then having to deal with it isn't the best way to approach this. No significant shift can happen without the question being addressed, and by defintion those people involved in agricultural production will be involved. If they're not, then there's problems.
But this is where capitalism has helped us, but turning the countryside into one huge factory. Easy to run, with work broken down into simple pieces. It doesn't need a raft of engineers.
Bernie Gunther said:No really. I'm quite serious. I can see that capitalism needs smashing and all that stuff. But I'm one of those annoying detail oriented types.
What's the plan to make sure we can all eat just after capitalism is smashed?
Capitalism puts food in supermarkets. What do we do instead if it's smashed?
So you don't have anything at hand to back up your £70 claim?TeeJay said:It was a while ago and I think I used UN figures. Why did I use them? Mainly because they the first ones I found that I could use to do the calculation I wanted to do. This wasn't some PhD - it was something I did for an hour or so last year sometime.
If anyone is interested in this subject they could do worse than have a look at the 2005 UNDP report: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/
Bernie Gunther said:Well yes, except that you're presumably doing this simultaneously with various environmental crises, where the only viable answer may well involve increasing the amount of human labour in food production.
Fair dos. And i'm not on here in the week anymore (unless i sort some stuff out) - you do when's best for you BG, and if that's not at all then fair enoughBernie Gunther said:Long answer.
Tomorrow OK? I'm off to bed.


Bernie Gunther said:I think you misunderstand me montevideo, I'd *like* it to work. I just want to assure myself that the important details have been thought through properly.
I could go and re-do the calculations using similar figures - for example those from recent United Nations Development Programme reports like the one I linked to above. I could cite my sources and show my working. In fact I could spent many hours doing all this and I'd probably come to a very similar figure to the £70/week one I did last time.butchersapron said:So you don't have anything at hand to back up your £70 claim?
Thanks for that teej JayTeeJay said:I could go and re-do the calculations using similar figures - for example those from recent United Nations Development Programme reports like the one I linked to above. I could cite my sources and show my working. In fact I could spent many hours doing all this and I'd probably come to a very similar figure to the £70/week one I did last time.
Can I actually prove this without doing it? Probably not.
Am I going to do it just because yet again you are being an utter fuckwit trying in about the fourth thread in a row to pick a fight with me? No, I'm not.
I could point to the graph I posted above which has an annual dollar income in PPP terms, and let people take a rough guess at where the average lies. If you guess at $6000pa this equals about £70/week.
I would however be very pleased to hear what you think the figure is, or listen to anyone else who has either worked it out or found the figure elsewhere.
How come you find it so difficult to spell my username?butchersapron said:Thanks for that teej Jay