A great post by someone else on the Guardian website.
They lie about the benefits
even when each benefit they claim is shown to be fraudulent, and at best only obtainable by intrusive levels of ID demands
They lie about the risks.
even when they are pointed out to them.
even when the details of the deficiencies in existing legislation have been highlighted.
even when the suggested safeguards have been ignored, and this fact pointed out.
They lie about the costs
and seek to cover up their lies by refusing to publish the reports, even in the face of a ruling saying they must
They lie about all opposition
"something to hide"
"paranoid"
supporting terrorism...
all ways of trying to portray opposition to their plans as antisocial or unpatriotic.
They lie about the neeed.
and instead artificially create more cases where ID must be produced, in order to promote a perception that a need exists.
They lie about the effects on society.
when even they incompetent and weak officialdom who are responsible for the figleaf of respectability for their actions are forced into warning on the "surveillance society"
They lie about the relationship between the individual and the state.
knowing that the right to demand that everyone ID themselves is a clear creation of power for officials over the public
They lie about the Human Rights implications
and deny the All Party Interest Group access to the data.
The lie about the scope
when the emergence of data sharing means that the NIR as a global index is a powerful tool for data mining.
They lie about the data
Having to be reminded every time that storing requests for information is itself a hugely valuable way of tracking people.
They lie about the isolation
Pretending that this is just one matter, when the combination of
ID cards,
NIR,
data sharing,
street cameras,
real-time-tracking speeding cameras that store care movement details for years,
monitoring of phone call traffic data and storing it for years,
monitoring of internet traffic data and storing it for years,
monitoring of cellphone position data and storing it for years
releasing data at will to the USA and other bodies that don't have our data safeguards
all contribute to a serious risk of the erosion of privacy.
They lie.
They lie.
They lie.
And given the other things they lied about - intelligence, WMDs, 45 minutes, dodgy dossiers,...
And given the past attempts to extend acts like the RIPA to give nearly every single government department down to and including the white fish authority the right to such surveillance data - an attempt defeated only because the then Home Sec's own son took him aside and spelled it out...
And given the authoritarian nature of the arrogant bastards who refuse to understand the existence of risks, or their own role in creating the risks, and the very fact that their own lies demonstrate the risks...
Like I say, they can SPIN on this!