Yes, they are.Yoj said:aren't the Windies the defending champions of this competition?
was he a pundit or a member of the public? ridiculous, there's so much to be gained by winning this game as a precursor to the ashes that deliberately losing doesn't make sense. jsut look at the twenty20 before the ashes series that was another, oh it doesn't matter game.Kenny Vermouth said:Good start by England this morning, but there was a guy on the radio suggesting that neither side wanted to win because it would give them more time to prepare for the Ashes.
I didn't catch the beginning but he was some kind of betting bloke with the surname McGovern and a scouse accent.mrkikiet said:was he a pundit or a member of the public? ridiculous, there's so much to be gained by winning this game as a precursor to the ashes that deliberately losing doesn't make sense. jsut look at the twenty20 before the ashes series that was another, oh it doesn't matter game.
Yeah, they should stop picking him - he's having a mare.mrkikiet said:harmison doesn't really suit one day cricket.
tangerinedream said:I ould love to see the Windies sort it out and get something together. They need to win something to get the game back on track and get somewhere back to being a power as the world game needs them.
At test level, the next decade could be fascinating, if the Aussies dwindle a bit at the Windies come back alive, then India, England, SA, Pakistan, Aus and them could all be seen as there and there abouts.
Don't really care for one dayers all that much but good to see the Aussies lose!
JTG said:Sri Lanka, don't be daft. Dynamite when they're on it, shite when they're not.
JTG said:I'd put India ahead of them.
Kenny Vermouth said:For a dead match, it was a great one dayer. Well played Kevin Pietersen, Sajid Mahmood, Chris Gayle and Dwayne Bravo.