Udo Erasmus
Well-Known Member
poster342002 said:Depends how it's done. There's a depressingly prevelant school of thought that seems to believe tha the answer to the world's environmental problems is to price the poor off everything - usually with the twisted justification of "well, if they were reeeaaalllly poor, they wouldn't be able to aford to [insert activity] in the first place". Progressive environmentalist need to vocally distance themselves from this reactionary nonsense.
Many measures to tackle climate change could actually benefit poorer people. For example a massive government programme of house insulation would mean that people would be paying less on their heating bills. Cheap public transport would also be of advantage to poorer people.
