Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

I human, the Ultimate Parasite.

Aldebaran

TheMadArab.IslamicFascist
Was there ever a species on earth as agressively parasitical as the human species?
Was there an other species that within such a limited time of its evolution (less then a nanosecond in the history of the Earth) left such a destructive, changing, irreparable footprint on the planet – and beyond - everywhere that species breaths?
Shall the Human manage to further parasite this planet until he fully and irreparably destroyed the habitat of all other species?
Shall this then automatically lead to the distinction of the Human or shall the Human be able to survive the catastrophe of his own existence.

What are your thoughts?

salaam.
 
Aldebaran said:
Was there ever a species on earth as agressively parasitical as the human species?

But didn't your god put the world together for the express purpose of providing stuff to use for its creation...? Ie, man...? And why not ask your god yourself...? I'd of thought it might give a better answer. Or doesn't your non-existent god listen to you anymore...? :rolleyes:
 
Aldebaran said:
Was there ever a species on earth as agressively parasitical as the human species?
Was there an other species that within such a limited time of its evolution (less then a nanosecond in the history of the Earth) left such a destructive, changing, irreparable footprint on the planet – and beyond - everywhere that species breaths?
Shall the Human manage to further parasite this planet until he fully and irreparably destroyed the habitat of all other species?
Shall this then automatically lead to the distinction of the Human or shall the Human be able to survive the catastrophe of his own existence.

What are your thoughts?

salaam.

'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.'

I wonder about whether as soon as we realised we had the power to destroy ourselves completely, we came to believe that humans were the end of evolution. Top of the chain, with no predators except ourselves. We can't really imagine anything after us, and implicit in that is that we will eventually destroy everything.

But like you say, the human race is nothing but a blip in time. The planet will carry on in some form long after the human race is gone though. :)

That's purely just my gut feeling. I really don't know the facts and theories. :o :D
 
Humans are as a species parasitic imo

If you look at a human city and examine how much nature remains it looks rather like the barren area around a termite mound or close by an ant heap.

Then you think of the areas like Britain where all the animals that could be a danger to humans have been wiped out then the land use for agriculture and its plain to see that we affect our surroundings in a big way and are like a parasite on them.

Thats all before the possibility of climate change which seems likely to affect humans themselves but still not at all like an extinction event.

Climate change will cause problems because of the nation state, large scale immigration / migration does not fit in well with the nation state, and the Nation state is totally a human constructon not a natural one.

imo nuclear weapons and the arms race between the USA and Soviet Union was a greater potential for an extinction event.

Parasites die when their hosts die, climate change just implies (for Humans) that the host will change, not that it will die.
 
foreigner said:
These don't sound like the questions of a good muslim...

or any good religion-member for that matter.

My apologies that I so bluntly intruded the exclusive terrain of those convinced to be unimaginable more intellectual advantaged then I am just because I am Muslim.

I'm afraid you shall have to coop with the horrible truth that I do possess a functioning brain, despite what you might have thought about this.

salaam.
 
weltweit said:
Thats all before the possibility of climate change which seems likely to affect humans themselves but still not at all like an extinction event.

I don't refer to the issue "climate change" specifically, but I do think the last centuries were much more catastrophic for the planet due to the human interventions, then they were when counting together all the previous centuries of human existence.

Parasites die when their hosts die, climate change just implies (for Humans) that the host will change, not that it will die.

The question remains if humans could adapt to the new environment they shaped.

salaam.
 
nah we'll just evolve we won't die out but just as there is no way the amoba had any idea what it woudl evolve into nor do we so we cannot invisage it...
 
moreover if you look at the mayans or the toltecs you can see that we know think that basically they got tothe poitn where they did destroy themselves and wipe out their own civiliseations as they basically moved int o greater and bigger cities which eventually became untennable then when desise and also lack of water and food wiped them out then they dissappeared save but for a handful of humanity ...

I'm guessing that mrsa or brid flu or summit else will wipe a consdierable amount of us out 12 monkies style and bang we'll be removed from the food chaina nd the rebalance will happen natrually it's not to say that we won't resetabilsh ourselves at some point...
 
the sickest thing would be if another mammalian species became totally self-aware and started getting all technological and linguistic and shit. competition :cool:
 
I expect great things of the Rats, once the Apes are out of the way.

They have hands, they are clever and curious. All they need is the chance ...
 
Humans are wonderful. We need to get our act together, though.

What kind of misanthrope are you to call humanity "parasitic"?

This is seriously bordering on "deep ecology" nonsense: the idea that people are a problem rather than the entire point of the exercise.
 
Humans aren't parasitic - some of our behaviours are parasitic, some symbiotic (weltwiet clearly taking the 'only big species count' route when thinking about human behaviour). Take a look at the ecosystems that have developed in tandem with agriculture, or the nascent ecosystems developing in cities (bearing in mind the modern city has only been around about 2/300 years) in which a variety of flora and fauna are finding or carving out new niches.

At present you can confortably argue that we're on the wrong side of many aspects of environmental behaviour - but then nature is more than capable of wiping out entrie ecosystems and species in one fell swoop all on it's own.

All this 'parasite' business is unwarranted - we need to change and redically, but nah, a parasite?
 
Jonti said:
But Rats are wonderful too.

You're not being species-ist are you? :mad:

Yes. Humans are superior. Effortlessly so, in my particular case. :)

All those rats, they come over here, gnaw at our floorboards, don't pay a penny of tax and you should see the mess they leave behind.

Humans first!
 
Jonti said:
I expect great things of the Rats, once the Apes are out of the way.

They have hands, they are clever and curious. All they need is the chance ...
Its not like their going to get it though no prizes for second place in evoloution.:D
 
kyser_soze said:
Humans aren't parasitic

There is in my view no other word for it.

Take a look at the ecosystems that have developed in tandem with agriculture, or the nascent ecosystems developing in cities (bearing in mind the modern city has only been around about 2/300 years) in which a variety of flora and fauna are finding or carving out new niches.

Only because they have the luck that humans don't find them annoying or flat out disturbing enough to destroy them when they invade the newly created niche.
That niche wouldn't be there if the environment which made it possible wouldn't serve the interest of humans and in no way it can repair what was destroyed for that.

but then nature is more than capable of wiping out entrie ecosystems and species in one fell swoop all on it's own.

Yes, but that then affects all species living there, even if not equally distributed.

salaam.
 
kyser_soze said:
All this 'parasite' business is unwarranted - we need to change and redically, but nah, a parasite?

It's just anti-human rhetoric typical of people that misunderstand the nature and value of humanity.
 
kyser_soze said:
Well, we've gotten through at least one global ice age intact...

Which affected the other species equally.
There is no comparison between this and what humans cause now.

salaam.
 
untethered said:
It's just anti-human rhetoric typical of people that misunderstand the nature and value of humanity.

No, it is called "realism".
What is in your view the - for you obvious very precious and special - value of "humanity" in comparison with Nature globally?

salaam.
 
Aldebaran said:
My apologies that I so bluntly intruded the exclusive terrain of those convinced to be unimaginable more intellectual advantaged then I am just because I am Muslim.

I'm afraid you shall have to coop with the horrible truth that I do possess a functioning brain, despite what you might have thought about this.

salaam.

I'm far from implying that you don't have a brain, on the contrary I'm always abit puzzled by intelligent people who embrace a religion.

And this thread is a perfect example of what confuses me, if you beleive in islam, then you beleive allah created everything, and that whatever in all of creation happens is the will of allah. Are you saying that there is the possibilitay that allah created humans as parasites? I don't know much about islam but that doesn't sound like a very islamic attitude to take towards human beings which are (presumably) amongst allahs finest creations.

You also seem to suggest in your question that humanity is acting as a force of evil, or at any rate as a force for destruction. Again, there's a disjoint there between the presumed attitude of a person who beleives in an all-powerful diety who's will is a positive force in the universe, and the suggestion that mankind might be no-good, and overall destructive.

Also you suggest that the final fate of humanity will be unaffected by the diety you beleive in, surely a good religionist would beleive that the diety will be the final judge in the outcome of the species, and that all other considerations are subservient to that judgement.

You've made no mention of the compatability with islam and sustainable society, and if islam is true then the islamic way should be the only real context by which a beleiver need to consider the long term fate of humanity and our environment. Basicaly I think this is he kind of question a muslim or xtian or jew cannot pose without the assumption of their respective dietys being a major influence on the nature of the answer.

So it surprised me that there was no mention of allah or god in the OP, and a generaly un-islamic framing of the quality of (what muslims beleive to be) allahs finest creations.

No doubt you'll say something about free-will and disresponsabilify the point, like religion always does.
 
foreigner said:
I'm far from implying that you don't have a brain, on the contrary I'm always abit puzzled by intelligent people who embrace a religion.

Only a display of an even greater arrogance. Probably you aren't even aware of this yourself.

And this thread is a perfect example of what confuses me, if you beleive in islam, then you beleive allah created everything, and that whatever in all of creation happens is the will of allah.

That has nothing to do with the subject. If you insist to give it a theological context, then you can place it under "humans and free will" and its interpretations.

Are you saying that there is the possibilitay that allah created humans as parasites?

No, I say the human species behaves parasitical , increasing this behaviour gradually over the last few centuries.

I don't know much about islam but that doesn't sound like a very islamic attitude to take towards human beings which are (presumably) amongst allahs finest creations.

As such they are also made responsible for all others.

You also seem to suggest in your question that humanity is acting as a force of evil, or at any rate as a force for destruction.

One can hardly deny that this is a fact.

Again, there's a disjoint there between the presumed attitude of a person who beleives in an all-powerful diety who's will is a positive force in the universe, and the suggestion that mankind might be no-good, and overall destructive.

There is no disjoint at all.

Also you suggest that the final fate of humanity will be unaffected by the diety you beleive in,

I suggest no such thing.

surely a good religionist would beleive that the diety will be the final judge in the outcome of the species, and that all other considerations are subservient to that judgement.

Of course.
That doesn't mean I can't reason from a standpoint that humans act like parasites. I didn't say anywhere they are God.

You've made no mention of the compatability with islam and sustainable society, and if islam is true then the islamic way should be the only real context by which a beleiver need to consider the long term fate of humanity and our environment.

You are in no way authorized to say how I should or should not reason. I'm quite capable of constructing the frame of my reasonings myself, thank you, and by the way, your perception of religion (and religious people) in general seems to be a rather ignorant and blindfolded one.

Basicaly I think this is he kind of question a muslim or xtian or jew cannot pose without the assumption of their respective dietys being a major influence on the nature of the answer.

You are wrong. Would I have posted this thread on the "philosophy" forum and with the intention to make it a "religious" debate, it would require a slightly different approach.

So it surprised me that there was no mention of allah or god in the OP, and a generaly un-islamic framing of the quality of (what muslims beleive to be) allahs finest creations.

I didn't make this thread to preach about Islam. Everyone familiar with my posts know who/what I am.
Would I be on a Muslim forum or addressing myself to an exclusively Muslim community, the OP would approach the issue with the addition of the Islamic point of view. That is not my intention and I am not inclined to change this.

No doubt you'll say something about free-will and disresponsabilify the point, like religion always does.

No doubt it was your intention to make "religion" the focus of this thread, instead of answering the simple questions in the OP. If you have nothing to answer on them, kindly read without comment or ignore. Thank you.

salaam.
 
Aldebaran said:
What is in your view the - for you obvious very precious and special - value of "humanity" in comparison with Nature globally?

Hey, you just have to look around you.

No, not Urban 75.

What I meant was, there's a difference between pointing out quite legitimate bad things that people do and that need to be improved on and going on what appears to be a general bad attitude meander about humanity in general.

That leads to deep ecology, as I've already mentioned. Bizarre people that talk apparently seriously about "Earth rights" and "speciesism" and plans for wiping out the 99.9% of humanity that doesn't include deep ecologists.

We have a responsibility to act as wise stewards of the Earth, not to get all miserable and self-hating.
 
untethered said:
Hey, you just have to look around you.

"looking around" can only underscore and confirm my points. I look around for over thirty years now and I saw what I came to question since I became aware of the world outside my craddle.
Humans all over the world act parasitical, constantly, and what is almost as disturbing as this undeniable fact, is that the vast majority isn't even aware of it and that from those who are, a significant part doesn't care.

salaam.
 
Aldebaran said:
"looking around" can only underscore and confirm my points. I look around for over thirty years now and I saw what I came to question since I became aware of the world outside my craddle.
Humans all over the world act parasitical, constantly, and what is almost as disturbing as this undeniable fact, is that the vast majority isn't even aware of it and that from those who are, a significant part doesn't care.

salaam.

You're being glass-half-empty, though, aren't you?

Human society and culture is wonderful. Yes, it has its downside, too. Yes, there are serious political problems with how many things are managed.

That doesn't mean we should throw in the towel. Stick up for humanity. Let's do it better!
 
untethered said:
You're being glass-half-empty, though, aren't you?

I don't know what you mean. (English is not my language)

Human society and culture is wonderful.

For humans (and not even for all of them) but I doubt other species or other parts of Nature would agree.

Yes, it has its downside, too. Yes, there are serious political problems with how many things are managed.

Solutions don't start at a higher level then yourself.

That doesn't mean we should throw in the towel. Stick up for humanity. Let's do it better!

Having a realistic view doesn't equal "throwing in the towel". Would I plan to do that I would be since long living in seclusion, alone with my books and my animals, avoiding contact with humans if not required for my biological and intellectual survival.

salaam.
 
Back
Top Bottom