ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
I liked Pride. Is that on it?
Superape said:"Immensely popular band hugely derided because of popularity shock! 'They were good when they were shit, but now they're not shit I think they're shit' said a fan who used to like them before everyone else liked them and then didn't like them anymore because everyone else did."

killer b said:you can cock off too. we're deriding them 'cos they're shit, not 'cos they're popular.![]()
I strongly advise against it, but if you insist, have some good 1987 albums handy to relieve the inevitable pain and embarrassment.DotCommunist said:It's been years since I played it...i'll dig it out when I get home
copliker said:I strongly advise against it, but if you insist, have some good 1987 albums handy to relieve the inevitable pain and embarrassment.
These will do:
Locust Abortion Technician - Butthole Surfers
Tallulah - The Go-Betweens
Warehouse Songs and Stories - Hüsker Dü
Sister - Sonic Youth
The Young Gods - The Young Gods
Songs About Fucking - Big Black
Pleased to Meet Me - The Replacements
copliker said:I strongly advise against it, but if you insist, have some good 1987 albums handy to relieve the inevitable pain and embarrassment.
These will do:
Locust Abortion Technician - Butthole Surfers
Tallulah - The Go-Betweens
Warehouse Songs and Stories - Hüsker Dü
Sister - Sonic Youth
The Young Gods - The Young Gods
Songs About Fucking - Big Black
Pleased to Meet Me - The Replacements
gabi said:Anyone who voted 'shit' knows sweet fuck all about music

Dubversion said:You are me,.
Idaho said:Some songs on Joshua Tree are ok. I think it was the turning point for U2. From then on it was bollocks all the way. Whereas Unforgettable Fire was great.
Eh? You've lost me. Or did I miss something?ouchmonkey said:I'd largely agree with this except I didn't buy The Joshua Tree precisely because I thought The Unforgettable Fire was rubbish too.
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:I liked Pride. Is that on it?
U2 are overblown and pompous, and I think from Joshua Tree onward they were fairly unimaginative. However the overblown and pompous worked before they were hugely successful. Bono's ego didn't seem that relevant. But once they became multi-squillionaires his intolerableness (heh - sounds like a title) became even more inescapable.bluestreak said:The only way anyone could possibly think The Joshua Tree wasn't overblown pompous unimaginative shite is someone who hasn't heard good music.
Idaho said:Eh? You've lost me. Or did I miss something?
It's not complicated, it's just illogical.ouchmonkey said:It's not that complicated.
I'd agree that : Some songs on Joshua Tree are ok.
: I think it was the turning point for U2.
I would not agree that the Unforgettable Fire was great.
It was rubbish.
So I expected Joshua Tree to be rubbish as well.
In retrospect it's possibly the better of the two but I don't care....
'cos I wouldn't bother listening to either.
Just occurred to me. Each band I mentioned has a bloody enormous body of outstanding work. The collective cost of recording it all probably wouldn't cover the airfare for Bono's hat.butchersapron said:That's my afternoon sorted. Retreat into youth. All great records.
Idaho said:If the Joshua Tree is partially ok, and the Unforgettable Fire is better than partially ok, how can it be rubbish?

Idaho said:It's not complicated, it's just illogical.
You think some songs on the Joshua Tree are ok, and that the unforgettable fire is better than the Joshua Tree. But that the Unforgettable Fire was rubbish.
If the Joshua Tree is partially ok, and the Unforgettable Fire is better than partially ok, how can it be rubbish?

Dubversion said:i'm still reeling from the fact you bought a U2 album.
you dappy cunt![]()

jonH said:2U were really rubbish Nobo has to be the worst
ouchmonkey said:Even at 14 I knew hair metal was not the way to go![]()