Because you live there at the time.
If people can vote it means they have registered.
So here are the questions:
1) If someone has come from another country and has registered to vote should they be allowed to vote in elections?
2) If I move to another borough and register to vote should I be allowed to vote in the council election?
3) If someone moved from Cardiff from London and registers to vote should they be able to vote in the GLA/London mayor elections?
I always vote, even when the selection is:
1. c- [ ]
2. c- [ ]
3. c- [ ]
4. c- [ ]
Well it would seem that almost no matter what happens today, tomorrow we'll still have a sexual beast as mayor.
At least there are a few decent alternatives but sadly not one with a good chance of winning.
I'd see it in a similar way to being a lodger in a family home. You pay your rent. You get some rights (accommodation, food). But you shouldn't presume to change or influence the way the household is run.
The cheek of it!
That analagy doesn't work. The Government is the people, and vice versa.
I always vote, even when the selection is:
1. cunt [ ]
2. cunt [ ]
3. cunt [ ]
4. cunt [ ]
Ah, but which people?
The citizenry, that's who.
If it's all the same I don't want arbitrary foreigners turning up here trying to run the show, and I wouldn't presume to do the same to them no matter how much a hash they're making of it themselves.
I always vote, even when the selection is:
1. cunt [ ]
2. cunt [ ]
3. cunt [ ]
4. cunt [ ]
'This is a local election for local people!'
'There's nothing for you here!'
They're not local people, they're visitors or guests.
'Local' means of a place, not just temporarily in a place.
But I'm temporarily in London! I plan to move back to Bristol, maybe even before the next mayor's term is over. What business of mine is it to force this decision on the people who will live here after I leave?They're not local people, they're visitors or guests.
'Local' means of a place, not just temporarily in a place.
It's still not your country.
Why do you presume you have the right to tell other countries how to manage themselves?
Why?
Would you always eat if the menu was:
1. shit
2. shit
3. shit
4. shit
Well it would seem that almost no matter what happens today, tomorrow we'll still have a sexual beast as mayor.
At least there are a few decent alternatives but sadly not one with a good chance of winning.
These are the right questions. Unpalatable though they may be...Does any of the shit taste any better than the other shit?
Does eating result in you getting shit for the next course too, or will you actually just get shit whether you pick one particular flavour of shit or not?

There's a fundamental difference in my mind between moving around within your country (renouncing rights in one place and gaining them in another) and visiting a country and expecting to have voting rights there as well as at home.

