Dave Mullen
Bolt Ya Radge!
IntoStella said:I mean.
![]()
Is this the exhibit in question? If so its even worse than I was led to believe.
IntoStella said:I mean.
![]()
Dave Mullen said:Is this the exhibit in question? If so its even worse than I was led to believe.

That goes with the territory - that's why I said earlier in this thread, "the art is, not unexpectedly, of very variable quality".IntoStella said:To be fair, some of it is abslutely bollocks.
That's a perfect description of the situation. They should put that on the sign outside.editor said:an open squat full of people enthusiastically slapping up bad art
Well, that's your opinion of course, but I suspect it may be slightly clouded by the personal issues you appear to have with the people running the place.IntoStella said:That's a perfect description of the situation. They should put that on the sign outside.
You said iteditor said:Well, that's your opinion of course, but I suspect it may be slightly clouded by the personal issues you appear to have with the people running the place.
not me, and you're an 'impartial' observer.editor said:I'd still rather have an open squat full of people enthusiastically slapping up bad art than an closed, empty building.
Actually I have to take this back as you often post up cool stuff here that you have photoshopped etc (eg your recent crack squirrels oneFfs - are you going to bother do something so we can stand around taking the piss?
).Indeed I am.IntoStella said:You said it not me, and you're an 'impartial' observer.
Because I don't consider it to be art. Visual satire, maybe, but not art. Actually that sounds a bit wanky too.TeeJay said:Actually I have to take this back as you often post up cool stuff here that you have photoshopped etc (eg your recent crack squirrels one).
In fact - why not get some it it put up at BAC ?

editor said:That goes with the territory - that's why I said earlier in this thread, "the art is, not unexpectedly, of very variable quality".
Personally, I usually find it prudent to see the work first before slagging it off or banging on about Damien Hurst, but I guess that's not Dave Mullen's way of doing things.
But I'd still rather have an open squat full of people enthusiastically slapping up bad art than an closed, empty building.
And, of course, they're open to display new work...
Sorry, but this is a very poor argument.IntoStella said:Because I don't consider it to be art. Visual satire, maybe, but not art. Actually that sounds a bit wanky too.![]()
I'm not an artist. I'm a journalist.

So when are you going to do something for us to pass judgement on?Dave Mullen said:No I don't go slagging things off for the hell of it I do go by information received or try and see for myself. Good that you mention Damien Hurst its because of his success that you get the likes of our person with the toy gun in the box who think they can insult people's intelligence by passing that nonsense off as art.
I think you'll find people were making crap art long, long before Damien Hirst started!Dave Mullen said:Good that you mention Damien Hurst its because of his success that you get the likes of our person with the toy gun in the box who think they can insult people's intelligence by passing that nonsense off as art.
Dave Mullen said:As I've said before I actually appreciate art but a lot of stuff that passes as art is just pretentiousness like the shite that wins the Turner Prize year on year. The Self indulgent twats are the protagonists of such nonsense. Have I made myself clear?
I agree that only producing stuff on the net excludes the many people who still don't have internet access and/or still see it as something that is 'not for them'. I just can't imagine the public clamouring for crack squirrel 'art'. I think the kind of exhibition you suggest -- Dawn of the Crack Squirrel? -- is a very good idea, but would be better suited to a community centre type space than an art gallery. People should be able to observe it while having a drink and, heaven forfend, a fag.TeeJay said:Sorry, but this is a very poor argument.![]()
There are many local people out there who would probably be fascinated to see a display containing the original thread, various newspaper headlines and the newest 'crack-squirrel-inspired' artwork: it is very eliteist to just do stuff online but then turn around and deny it to the very community that the rest of the London media is chattering about. A display at BAC where anyone could walk in and see the whole thing displayed would make it highly accessible to local people and also be a good chance for them to turn the tables and be able to point, laugh and gossip about the media rather than Brixton be treated like a zoo as always and just have to take it passively.
"Famous people who used to live in ****** Block" - would this make a good article? There must be a few.editor said:(He does have a local connection though as he used to live in the same Brixton block as me).

The Ritzy?IntoStella said:...would be better suited to a community centre type space than an art gallery. People should be able to observe it while having a drink and, heaven forfend, a fag.
editor said:I think you'll find people were making crap art long, long before Damien Hirst started!
You're a bit obsessed by him though, aren't you? I mean, he's got absolutely nothing to do with Brixton Arts and still you're banging on about him!!!
(He does have a local connection though as he used to live in the same Brixton block as me).
If the 'worth' of art was agreed by concensus then Jack Vettriano would be even more grossly overrated than he is already.memespring said:Why doesn't someone photograph the full contents of BAC and put it somewhere people can leave their comments (flickr.com or a blog or something)?
That way there might be some consensus on what's crap, whats great and what's mediocre.

Me too. There's some very good stuff in their combined canon of work.Blagsta said:Actually I quite like some of Tracey Emin's, Damien Hurst's and Gillian Wearing's etc work.
editor said:Me too. There's some very good stuff in their combined canon of work.
Just because you're unable to appreciate it, don't presume that it makes the art of poor quality.Dave Mullen said:Are you having a laugh?
editor said:Just because you're unable to appreciate it, don't presume that it makes the art of poor quality.
So how much have you actually seen of Hirst, Emin's etc work?
So you actually know very little about their work then?Dave Mullen said:Passing off a sheep in formaldehyde and an unmade bed as art is just insulting people's intelligence in any case I'm unlikely to see a lot of their work as Hurst has most of his work in Saatchi's gallery and I for one am not going to line that cunt's pockets.
Dave Mullen said:Are you having a laugh?

Poor excuse.Dave Mullen said:Passing off a sheep in formaldehyde and an unmade bed as art is just insulting people's intelligence in any case I'm unlikely to see a lot of their work as Hurst has most of his work in Saatchi's gallery and I for one am not going to line that cunt's pockets.