I'm vegetarian, but I have no problem with meat-eaters
noone will be truly free until all the animals are allowed to live as equals to humans
its true. i can't wait untill goats can apply for driving licences
thats funny, cos i am a meat eater, and have no problems with vegans, but do with vegetarians.
Personally, I wouldn't wear fur because I object to a living animal being treated as a by-product of something to wrap around my neck. I'm vegetarian, but I have no problem with meat-eaters, all part of the food chain, big animals eat smaller animals, and most of us would prefer to eat animals who have had happy lives. I'm happy to wear leather, and people in cold climates who wear fur generally eat the animal in question.
I just have a problem with using an animal simply for its skin - I just find it repellent.
Doesn't the meat from animals used for fur get turned into pet food or something?
Joustmaster, several people have already explained on this thread why they consider fur to be wrong. If you are still unable to understand, there is a lot of information about the fur trade on the RSPCA website:
http://www.rspca.org.uk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RSPCA/RSPCARedirect&pg=fur
Probably the same reason I have problems with meat eaters who will eat a cow but get squeamish about a horse![]()
its wrong to kill people. its ok to kill animals.
cos we is cleverer innit
i actually asked a cow if he wanted to not be eatenm and allowed to vote and wear clothes like a human once and he just did a shit on my trainers

Personally, I wouldn't wear fur because I object to a living animal being treated as a by-product of something to wrap around my neck. I'm vegetarian, but I have no problem with meat-eaters, all part of the food chain, big animals eat smaller animals, and most of us would prefer to eat animals who have had happy lives. I'm happy to wear leather, and people in cold climates who wear fur generally eat the animal in question.
I just have a problem with using an animal simply for its skin - I just find it repellent.
thats funny, cos i am a meat eater, and have no problems with vegans, but do with vegetarians.

yeah exactly!
not eat meat but wear leather or drink milk or eat cheese, both of which are responsible for loads of animal deaths. seems a bit of best of both worlds. to me.
the vast maojority of humans do have a problem with killing animals, even if they get it done for them (meat).
i find it rather scary people whose emotions arent rumbled by it. it concerns me that these people may not care to omuch about any life loss.
there is a link bewteen animal killers and human killers.
im far more clever than you, so is it ok for me to kill you?
your statement is wrong anway.
it IS wrong (as in illegal) to kill humans.
it is also ilegal to kill some animals.
the vast maojority of humans do have a problem with killing animals, even if they get it done for them (meat).
i find it rather scary people whose emotions arent rumbled by it. it concerns me that these people may not care to omuch about any life loss.
there is a link bewteen animal killers and human killers.
Rabbit is used in pet food, so there's an argument that coney fur is a by product of the meat industry, like leather, but mink, chinchilla, raccoon, polecats/ferrets. foxes etc. are not. Those animals are killed solely for their fur.
i bet most of it is used in some way. it cost money to throw stuff away.Surely a relevant related point is how much of a meat animal is used for meat, then?
Personally, I wouldn't wear fur because I object to a living animal being treated as a by-product of something to wrap around my neck. I'm vegetarian, but I have no problem with meat-eaters, all part of the food chain, big animals eat smaller animals, and most of us would prefer to eat animals who have had happy lives. I'm happy to wear leather, and people in cold climates who wear fur generally eat the animal in question.
I just have a problem with using an animal simply for its skin - I just find it repellent.

Joustmaster, several people have already explained on this thread why they consider fur to be wrong. If you are still unable to understand, there is a lot of information about the fur trade on the RSPCA website:
http://www.rspca.org.uk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RSPCA/RSPCARedirect&pg=fur
aahh
so the RSPCA campaigns against fur does it?
would that be the same RSPCA that endorses Freedom Food? More on the RSPCA's Freedom Food here
The same RSPCA that keeps horses is conditions like this? that cause the British Equine Veterinary Association to state their concerns about the RSPCA's treatment of horses here?
The same RSPCA that put down this
![]()
healthy pet cat?
While I'm opposed to animal cruelty I don't really see the RSPCA as a credible source of information. People in glass houses ...etc
ah, I see I was correct earlier in the thread.I bet people could argue about this
a lot of these so called animals aren't so innocent themselves