nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Did it ever occur to you that they want to be left alone?
We'd all like it if you left us alone. Guess you didn't think about that - eh?

Did it ever occur to you that they want to be left alone?

My point exactly: with the possible exception of "beggar", none of the people you've described automatically qualify as the underclass.
Is it really that those outside the system are more of a problem than those inside it (who don't necessarily pay their taxes either)?
Or is it just easier to target the less powerful ones?
That is rubbish. They pay taxes on their family credit/income support etc not to mention their beer and fags. The problem is not that they are outside the system, but they are in it and denied the opportunity to be better off.
Lobster, I suggest you stop digging. The hole you have dug is already deeper than you are tall, and the sides keep falling in.
IMHO the way that longterm benefit claimants (a heterogenous mass which can't all be "helped" by the same methods) are frequently lumped in with "drug addicts, prostitutes, pimps, beggers, swindlers, gamblers" is offensive.
Most benefits are taxable - Incapacity Benefit has tax docked from it before you even get it. The same goes IIRC for DLA and CA. The main reason more benefit claimants aren't aware of this is that their benefits don't take them over the annual tax threshold. Work and/or education is not (and never will be) the solution for everyone whom Lobster has deemed to be underclass.
What might help some of the "underclass" (for want of a better word) who can be helped is to offer help on the individual's terms, in a way that the individual might have a chance of accepting it - not to suit the convenience of some well-meaning person who's looking at the situation from outside and frankly hasn't got a clue what it's like.
So don't ask here. Go into the real world, ask a person you think is underclass and listen to the reply, even if it makes no sense to you.
Then ask the next oooh let's say 500 people you think are underclass.
Then have a good think.
Then go back to your sample (if possible) and check that you've understood what was said.
IMHO then and only then should you offer help, and even then, you should ask whether this is in a form which will actually help and can be taken up. When people take up the help, keep checking that it does actually help them (and if not, what needs to be changed) - you need to keep track for at least a few years,
That is "working with" people.
People classed as drug addicts, prostitutes , pimps, beggers , swindlers gamblers and others similar people of society.
I think looking at this class and trying to encourage change instead of ignoring them is better than leaving them on there own.
i came across an 'interesting' article on the underclass as part of my revision see http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.14891/pub_detail.asp
it amazes me that a supossed academic can get away with what are essentially racist, discriminatory views.
The round table was Haringay Solidarity Group (HSG), Praxis from Glasgow, London Coalition Against Poverty (LCAP) and Independant Working Class Association (IWCA). Gary O'Shea was speaking for the IWCA.
I'm crap at computors so I cant send you links but you could google them.
The two practical examples that O'Shea gave were:
1. Residents holding a demonstration to reclaim a park used for drug deadling.
2. Residents buiding a wall to block off an alleyway which was a notorious mugging blackspot.
I was on the panel as the LCAP representative but didn't have much to say on that particular question. We are a small group and relatively new.
We did work with the residents of an emergency hostel to campaign for a security gate to prevent drug takers and prostitutes from using the stair wells, landings and lifts.
This also had the unexpected side effect of combating domestic violence as women were talking to each other more and gaining confidence and the the support of others.
Yay it works!
I honestly had no idea how to do that till just now.

Now, if we had more like this from supporters of the IWCA, HI instead of the usual sectarian bollocks then we could move ahead on this. No?
The round table was Haringay Solidarity Group (HSG), Praxis from Glasgow, London Coalition Against Poverty (LCAP) and Independant Working Class Association (IWCA). Gary O'Shea was speaking for the IWCA.
I'm crap at computors so I cant send you links but you could google them.
The two practical examples that O'Shea gave were:
1. Residents holding a demonstration to reclaim a park used for drug deadling.
2. Residents buiding a wall to block off an alleyway which was a notorious mugging blackspot.
I was on the panel as the LCAP representative but didn't have much to say on that particular question. We are a small group and relatively new.
We did work with the residents of an emergency hostel to campaign for a security gate to prevent drug takers and prostitutes from using the stair wells, landings and lifts.
This also had the unexpected side effect of combating domestic violence as women were talking to each other more and gaining confidence and the the support of others.
I dunno. The IWCA/HI split was notable for the dignified lack of public sniping
on both sides.
It's the supposed *supporters* on here who get up my nose. Most of them claim to support, but in reality do fuck all but come on here and either spew out their one liners, involve themselves in obscure semantics and caricature the rest of the left.
Pretty pathetic really.
We did n't work against the drug users. We campaigned for a security gate. The drug users are taking drugs some other place. completely unimpeded by us.
People classed as drug addicts, prostitutes , pimps, beggers , swindlers gamblers and others similar people of society.
I think looking at this class and trying to encourage change instead of ignoring them is better than leaving them on there own.

What I meant was if you made links with service user groups, drug users advocacy groups etc, then some inroads could be made in addressing the anti-social behaviour of some drug users. Much like needle exchange campaigns not to dump used works or the stuff that Black Poppy magazine has done around disposing of used works. I notice you've already got links with The Pavement magazine, which is great.
On the other hand i was able to recognise the kind of situation he was talking about. He put it very forcefully at one point stating that "there is an underclass within the working class whose values are opposed to the rest of the class."
It did make me think about things a bit differently afterwards. There are places where third generation drug addicts are common. That surely means a distinct culture and set of values to "ordainary" working class people. Does it make sence, then to talk about a distinct underclass after all?
This was what I originally meant. I think its very relevant.
Bloody hell you could have expressed yourself more sensibly in that case
