And I wasn't doing 120 - maybe touched 100 at times but my car at the time wouldn't have stood for 120.
Oh noez. JTG thinking I'm a div! I might as well kill myself now...no need to be even more divvy agnes, I'm not upset. But your posts increase the divvyness count every time you do it.
Will googlemaps tell me how long it'll take to get somewhere? I didn't know it did thatwho knew this could turn into a bunfight?
madz you should've just looked it up on googlemaps like a normal person.
Mind you, it's still quicker to ask on here 
Will googlemaps tell me how long it'll take to get somewhere? I didn't know it did thatMind you, it's still quicker to ask on here
![]()
Ah yes, but as any fule kno the roads are totally safe as long as you're staying below the speed limit! It's only when you go 1mph over that limit that the Armco suddenly leaps in front of you and the road suddenly becomes a maze of twisty passages, all alike, full of otters on bicycles and small babies happily playing in the fast lane.
I see it happening all the time. The only known cure is a flat cap, string-backed driving gloves and driving an Austin 1100 at 40mph on the motorway. We should be grateful to those selfless individuals who do this on our behalf.
Someone making the roads a safer place, yesterday:
![]()
Thanks, I appreciate that.I'm relieved you don't make a habit of it Agnes and I withdraw the word 'prat' that I chucked your way earlier.
You must have missed the bit where I said I slowed down every time I saw someone else's lights. While driving at 120mph on a British motorway is not exactly the height of responsibility, even in the darker watches of the night, I don't feel that I set out to drive as irresponsibly as I possibly could! I'm sure my IAM instructor blokey would not have been particularly impressed with my adherence to speed limits, I feel that he might not have been underwhelmed by my observation and awareness.But next time I'm driving to Bristol over night with my kids asleep in the back, and I start to pull out to overtake a lorry after checking there's nothing coming up behind, only to find some fuckwit is coming up on my arse doing a ton a few seconds later,
Ah, I assumed that photo was not taken on the motorway, and that you'd only be wearing the gloves for high-speed (ie 40mph) drivingWho the fuck gave you permission to post that?! Must've been taken after I lost my driving gloves.

Just wondering
I'm disinclined to take part in the discussion; but if there IS an accident on the M4 at 120 mph, the perpetrators ARE prepared to pay the costs, aren't they?


How can you do that if you're splattered across the central reservation?
There were no other cars on the motorway, it was 3am. If a vehicle was approaching me at speed on the motorway it would have been going the wrong way.Like you are ready to life imprisonment if you splatter someones kids across the central reservation?
Or you or your estate are willing to pay the cost of the emergency services?
I can't be arsed to do that maths right now but at some speeds by the time you see an obstruction or you see a vehicle approaching at speed there is not or barely the time to react before impact. On a railway you can have tht with extra long bloc sections, you don't have that on a motorway.
I'd say it's probably not worth continuing this argument! If you were boasting that you did 120mph every time you went out on the road, I think Isambard might have a point. You haven't - and presumably you don't - so he's trying to hold you to account on an ongoing basis for something that happened as a one-off, and which didn't result in a terrible smash.There were no other cars on the motorway, it was 3am. If a vehicle was approaching me at speed on the motorway it would have been going the wrong way.
I don't think there's anything I've said on the matter (can't speak for madz) which might suggest I think otherwise. Which makes your apparent desire to ram the point home just a little tedious. I suppose you've never, ever done anything fuckwitted in your life, then?doing something fuckwitted becomes no less fuckwitted just because there were no bad consequences on that occasion
you're both fuckwits![]()
As a general rule:
1) Depends on where in London (ok, Brixton)
2) Depends on the time of day
3) Depends on how well you know the roads
I don't think there's anything I've said on the matter (can't speak for madz) which might suggest I think otherwise. Which makes your apparent desire to ram the point home just a little tedious. I suppose you've never, ever done anything fuckwitted in your life, then?
We've all done silly, crazy things. Get over it. I expect that even you have./QUOTE]
He put drugs up his bum!![]()
Cars are faster, but the roads are designed for a specific maximum speed - eg. sightlines on a corner vs. stopping distances.
So much to poke fun at...
You're the ones who have over protested the point somewhat. I ignored this for a while and came back to find you both still flapping around being tedious with your own self justifying bollocks.
The last point is somewhat redundant, having made mistakes of your own does not mean you're permanently excluded from passing comment on other people's.
Here's how it could have been:
Me - that was a bit divvy of you both
You - yeah, shan't do that again
But you both squawked for fucking Britain about it

What stopping distances would those be? The ones of an Austin Maxi (or equivalent) as still used by the highway code? Or those of a modern car fitted with ABS and Traction control etc?
Also weren't motorways originally designed with no speed limit in mind as there wasn't one.
I'm all for slowing down on A roads, in cities and in fact all other roads it does make sense. But at 3 'o'clock in the morning on a 3 lane motorway with next to no traffic I think it is perfectly reasonable to be doing a ton!
What stopping distances would those be? The ones of an Austin Maxi (or equivalent) as still used by the highway code? Or those of a modern car fitted with ABS and Traction control etc?

What stopping distances would those be? The ones of an Austin Maxi (or equivalent) as still used by the highway code? Or those of a modern car fitted with ABS and Traction control etc?
And I wasn't doing 120I'd say it's probably not worth continuing this argument! If you were boasting that you did 120mph every time you went out on the road, I think Isambard might have a point. You haven't - and presumably you don't - so he's trying to hold you to account on an ongoing basis for something that happened as a one-off, and which didn't result in a terrible smash.
That's why I've bowed out of this rather silly "debate", anyway.
Something else that's been conveniently overlooked.