Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?
Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?
For a moment there, I thought you were talking about the England match...



I like horror films. I like gore. I don't like watching people being tourtured.
Saw was about my limit for this sort of film.
neighbor number 13
Koi no mon
and though I have not seen it, I hear he is in 'animal crossing the movie' if you can believe they made such a thing.

Animal Crossing The Movie?![]()
is Saw any good, good story etc? I see its on Freeview tonight
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?
Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.
That, Louloubelle, is a genuinely interesting disquisition
GS(v)
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?
Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.
IIRC, Blockbuster (among other places) did stock the so-called 'documentary' entitled 'Executions' back in the late 1990's. 'Executions' claimed to be an expose of the realities of capital punishment, rather than simply being the genuine gorefest crammed with footage of various real-life executions (which included genuine footage of someone being stoned to death) that it actually was.
Despite containing footage that made even me (a crime writer from a military family) feel really quite appalled, and despite the fuss that was made about said film at the time of its release, it was a very big seller as I recall.
So, sad fact though it undoubtedly is, there's undoubtedly a pretty large market for even the most gratuitously unpleasant of films these days.
Pussy.
Its just a cautionary tale about obnoxious backpackers coming to a sticky end with abit (and only abit) of torture thrown in.
I have never seen "Executions" but I did sit thought most of a "video nasty" called "Faces of Death" in the 80s.
I didn't enjoy it at all, but I sat through it because sitting and watching FOD with your friends in the 80s was a kind of rite of passage. You were meant to watch it and not be sick, look away, whatever, to show that you were tough and grown up.
These days kids have a shorter rite of passage that seems to consist of watching 2 Girls One Cup while their friends film their responses and put them on youtube.
I think the main market for "executions" is probably traumatised ex forces people who struggle with untreated / undiagnosed PTSD and who find comfort in watching this stuff possibly because it alleviates a sense of loneliness. It reassures them that they are not alone in witnessing terrible things and that other people have seen it (and filmed it) too.
It may also provide a sense of mastery over overwhelming anxieties relating to violent traumatic experiences in that the experience of the horribly violent thing can be controlled, turned on or off via a remote control. This can make people feel that "I know where it is" (in the telly) and this may reduce the anxiety that the dangerous / violent thing lurks hidden away anywhere and everywhere.
I do not believe that watching this stuff is in any way therapeutic. I'm just saying that I can imagine the reasons why some people watch this stuff.
I remember watching a TV documentary about the website Ogrish (or was it Rotten?) and its history and it turned out that the founder was ex military and that almost all of the regular users were ex military. The majority of the photos and videos on the site were provided by military and ex military people and there was a huge underground network of military and ex military people exchanging such photos. They interviewed some of these people and they were clearly trying to manage their PTSD by exposing themselves to such material. It was very sad.
I do not believe that films like Saw or Hostel have much in common with films like Execution or FOD.
I saw some footage recently of the Nigerian police murdering people by shooting them and it left me feeling very upset for days. There was no gore, no exploding eyeballs, just innocent people made to lie down on the ground before being shot.
To me, the violence in Hostel (at least most of it) is so over the top, unrealistic and squelchy that it is almost comedic. The underlying menace of the narrative about trafficking and the consumption of human beings is far, far more scary.
some Itchy and Scratchy as food for thought
http://videos.sapo.pt/hidWyCbroCWLghHq9yrO
Yeah, those real snuff movies that don't exist. Hostel was a pretty good example of the "group of idiots get mashed up, one of them gets dubious revenge" genre. You saw the cover, you saw the quote from The Mirror advertising it as the goriest movie you'll ever ever see* (or something), why did you watch it?
* they've obviously never seen Braindead![]()

bad taste
Only a bit of torture - great!
My point is I don't advocate censorship, and if this sort of thing floats your boat, then you should be free to watch it.
Just wondering why people would pay to see people being tortured?
I like Glee, no doubt many on here do not.
Horses for courses?
violence is dramatic and exciting. people like this.
Just wondering why people would pay to see people being tortured?
