Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hostel - bloody hell!

Louloubelle! i found that a fascinating read and not having seen the film for a long time, you have converted me. Hostel 2 is a high-brow satire of modern times. :cool:
 
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?

Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.

i thought it was absolutely awful, fucking pointless.
 
Someone at work bought me Hostel 2 in secret santa.

When I made a noise about "who the fuck would think I was into that sort of thing?!" no-one owned up.
 
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?

Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.

IIRC, Blockbuster (among other places) did stock the so-called 'documentary' entitled 'Executions' back in the late 1990's. 'Executions' claimed to be an expose of the realities of capital punishment, rather than simply being the genuine gorefest crammed with footage of various real-life executions (which included genuine footage of someone being stoned to death) that it actually was.

Despite containing footage that made even me (a crime writer from a military family) feel really quite appalled, and despite the fuss that was made about said film at the time of its release, it was a very big seller as I recall.

So, sad fact though it undoubtedly is, there's undoubtedly a pretty large market for even the most gratuitously unpleasant of films these days.
 
I saw Hostel 2 a few weeks ago....now, thatwas bad! But I liked something about the way they filmed it, it looked kind of cool.
 
Watched this last night. How the fuck is something this sadistic considered entertainment? Who actually enjoys this sort of thing?

Maybe Blockbuster should just stock real snuff movies and have done with it.

Pussy.

Its just a cautionary tale about obnoxious backpackers coming to a sticky end with abit (and only abit) of torture thrown in.
 
IIRC, Blockbuster (among other places) did stock the so-called 'documentary' entitled 'Executions' back in the late 1990's. 'Executions' claimed to be an expose of the realities of capital punishment, rather than simply being the genuine gorefest crammed with footage of various real-life executions (which included genuine footage of someone being stoned to death) that it actually was.

Despite containing footage that made even me (a crime writer from a military family) feel really quite appalled, and despite the fuss that was made about said film at the time of its release, it was a very big seller as I recall.

So, sad fact though it undoubtedly is, there's undoubtedly a pretty large market for even the most gratuitously unpleasant of films these days.

I have never seen "Executions" but I did sit thought most of a "video nasty" called "Faces of Death" in the 80s.

I didn't enjoy it at all, but I sat through it because sitting and watching FOD with your friends in the 80s was a kind of rite of passage. You were meant to watch it and not be sick, look away, whatever, to show that you were tough and grown up.

These days kids have a shorter rite of passage that seems to consist of watching 2 Girls One Cup while their friends film their responses and put them on youtube.

I think the main market for "executions" is probably traumatised ex forces people who struggle with untreated / undiagnosed PTSD and who find comfort in watching this stuff possibly because it alleviates a sense of loneliness. It reassures them that they are not alone in witnessing terrible things and that other people have seen it (and filmed it) too.

It may also provide a sense of mastery over overwhelming anxieties relating to violent traumatic experiences in that the experience of the horribly violent thing can be controlled, turned on or off via a remote control. This can make people feel that "I know where it is" (in the telly) and this may reduce the anxiety that the dangerous / violent thing lurks hidden away anywhere and everywhere.

I do not believe that watching this stuff is in any way therapeutic. I'm just saying that I can imagine the reasons why some people watch this stuff.

I remember watching a TV documentary about the website Ogrish (or was it Rotten?) and its history and it turned out that the founder was ex military and that almost all of the regular users were ex military. The majority of the photos and videos on the site were provided by military and ex military people and there was a huge underground network of military and ex military people exchanging such photos. They interviewed some of these people and they were clearly trying to manage their PTSD by exposing themselves to such material. It was very sad.

I do not believe that films like Saw or Hostel have much in common with films like Execution or FOD.

I saw some footage recently of the Nigerian police murdering people by shooting them and it left me feeling very upset for days. There was no gore, no exploding eyeballs, just innocent people made to lie down on the ground before being shot.

To me, the violence in Hostel (at least most of it) is so over the top, unrealistic and squelchy that it is almost comedic. The underlying menace of the narrative about trafficking and the consumption of human beings is far, far more scary.

some Itchy and Scratchy as food for thought

http://videos.sapo.pt/hidWyCbroCWLghHq9yrO
 
Pussy.

Its just a cautionary tale about obnoxious backpackers coming to a sticky end with abit (and only abit) of torture thrown in.

Only a bit of torture - great!

My point is I don't advocate censorship, and if this sort of thing floats your boat, then you should be free to watch it.

Just wondering why people would pay to see people being tortured?

I like Glee, no doubt many on here do not.

Horses for courses?
 
I have never seen "Executions" but I did sit thought most of a "video nasty" called "Faces of Death" in the 80s.

I didn't enjoy it at all, but I sat through it because sitting and watching FOD with your friends in the 80s was a kind of rite of passage. You were meant to watch it and not be sick, look away, whatever, to show that you were tough and grown up.

These days kids have a shorter rite of passage that seems to consist of watching 2 Girls One Cup while their friends film their responses and put them on youtube.

I think the main market for "executions" is probably traumatised ex forces people who struggle with untreated / undiagnosed PTSD and who find comfort in watching this stuff possibly because it alleviates a sense of loneliness. It reassures them that they are not alone in witnessing terrible things and that other people have seen it (and filmed it) too.

It may also provide a sense of mastery over overwhelming anxieties relating to violent traumatic experiences in that the experience of the horribly violent thing can be controlled, turned on or off via a remote control. This can make people feel that "I know where it is" (in the telly) and this may reduce the anxiety that the dangerous / violent thing lurks hidden away anywhere and everywhere.

I do not believe that watching this stuff is in any way therapeutic. I'm just saying that I can imagine the reasons why some people watch this stuff.

I remember watching a TV documentary about the website Ogrish (or was it Rotten?) and its history and it turned out that the founder was ex military and that almost all of the regular users were ex military. The majority of the photos and videos on the site were provided by military and ex military people and there was a huge underground network of military and ex military people exchanging such photos. They interviewed some of these people and they were clearly trying to manage their PTSD by exposing themselves to such material. It was very sad.

I do not believe that films like Saw or Hostel have much in common with films like Execution or FOD.

I saw some footage recently of the Nigerian police murdering people by shooting them and it left me feeling very upset for days. There was no gore, no exploding eyeballs, just innocent people made to lie down on the ground before being shot.

To me, the violence in Hostel (at least most of it) is so over the top, unrealistic and squelchy that it is almost comedic. The underlying menace of the narrative about trafficking and the consumption of human beings is far, far more scary.

some Itchy and Scratchy as food for thought

http://videos.sapo.pt/hidWyCbroCWLghHq9yrO

Great post. Maybe I am just a big girl's blouse?
 
Yeah, those real snuff movies that don't exist. Hostel was a pretty good example of the "group of idiots get mashed up, one of them gets dubious revenge" genre. You saw the cover, you saw the quote from The Mirror advertising it as the goriest movie you'll ever ever see* (or something), why did you watch it?


* they've obviously never seen Braindead :)

Haven't seen, and have no desire to see, this recent-ish crop of 'torture porn' (or whatever the media calls it) films, but just wanted to say Braindead is fucking hilarious. I have it on VHS somewhere :cool:

What was that other one he did? Wasn't as good as Braindead.
 
Only a bit of torture - great!

My point is I don't advocate censorship, and if this sort of thing floats your boat, then you should be free to watch it.

Just wondering why people would pay to see people being tortured?

I like Glee, no doubt many on here do not.

Horses for courses?

violence is dramatic and exciting. people like this.
 
violence is dramatic and exciting. people like this.

I like violence in films like Predator or Die Hard 4. And again if people want to see films like this, then I have no objection.

Just I don't get the appeal of torture as entertainment. But, like I said, if it floats your boat.......
 
Hostel was definitely meant to be partly satirical - whether it managed to do it well or not, I don't know (most people seem to think not, which was the bit which put me off watching it, not the "omg eyeball!" reviews). It's pretty common with the grotesque - e.g. 120 Days Of Sodom.
 
Just wondering why people would pay to see people being tortured?

Cos we know we're not actually watching people being tortured and indeed wouldnt want to watch anybody being tortured (which when we watch these films we're not). Its the drama effect. Why would we want to watch somebody die of cancer (e.g. like what happens in soaps sometimes) or somebody lose everthing they have and end up a prostitute (again happen in soaps), surely this is just as difficult to explain as to why these things attract audiences? In a way its probably more terryfying and grim because these things actually happen and are a reflection on reality whilst gore and torture is pure farce.

Catharsis. Watching these films drastically changes our emotions, we feel fear and it thrills us because we know ultimately we're safe.

Roman circus for a modern age (but nicer and more humane).
 
Hostel - omg, when that Japanese woman had an eyeball hanging out. That made me laugh cos it's so damn outrageous. When I first saw those scenes, I said 'that's fuckin' impossible. For one you'll be out cold from shock and the nerve endings to the eye, it'd be so painful you couldn't move." And there she was running around town - til she caught a reflection...

Then I realised that's the whole of point Hostel.
The Dir is a funny guy... :)

Yeah Pt II is superior, but Pt I is sweet.
 
Human suffering is entertaining.

I don't really get much out of those films, but they look like a lot of fun to make.
 
Back
Top Bottom