Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Homeschooling Pros & Cons

Its nobody elses business how children are educated so long as it doesnt forclose their options in later life

What's the point of arguing? Over all the similar threads we've argued, you basically want a system that gives the same level of support as somewhere like Sweden but without the quid pro quo of a greater state role in kids life, and it ain't gonna happen that way - the reason the Swedish and Finnish education systems (for example) are so good is precisely because they are able to reach so far into people's lives, especially childrens, with concepts like the single child record.
 
I think you are confusing me with someone else. I dont recall every argiung with you over any aspect of the swedish education system:confused:
Im not in favour of the state having control over anyones lives- in fact I think the UK government probably already tries to exercise a far greater control over most individuals lives than exists in scandinavian countries- only strictly on the governments terms at all times
IM in favour of the state butting out of individuals decis9ons- unless its asked to. for instance in education of children. If you dont put your children into a state school they shouldnt be allowed to interfere
 
IM sure I could :) I just dont need to, so wont.
I managed very well with all the maths I do know, in fact I believe much of the mathematical content taught to children in schools as part of the GCSE syllabus is completely irrelevant to most of them in later life

It is, but it has to be in there as an introduction to A level!
 
What's the point of arguing? Over all the similar threads we've argued, you basically want a system that gives the same level of support as somewhere like Sweden but without the quid pro quo of a greater state role in kids life, and it ain't gonna happen that way - the reason the Swedish and Finnish education systems (for example) are so good is precisely because they are able to reach so far into people's lives, especially childrens, with concepts like the single child record.

I think their success rate depends more on the way they teach their kids, rather than the fact that they ban home edding...

How many people actually do home ed in this country? Are they in the main responsible for worse results than our schools?


I haven't argued about a Swedish education system anywhere anyhow... are you confusing me with someone else. :confused:
 
Don't build strawmen about home edding - I said nothing of the sort.

I was referring to wider debates we've had about ed&welfare issues...don't bother about it...
 
It is, but it has to be in there as an introduction to A level!

IF they sit a maths A level yes...or something related such as physics
If they dont then its really not important for them to know how to perform complicated algebra for instance...

This is where the argument about home education that Gmarthews and Kyser -soze are trying to present falls flat.
Home educated children are only required to study to their age, ability and aptitude and any special needs they may have.

If they arent apt at maths, arguing that you are forclosing careers to them is a nonsense. You are no more limited by your home education in terms of careers than you would be at school. If you dont like maths and arent good at it ( and many people arent mathematically minded- particularly if talented at english or artistic subjects) then you are just as unlikely to pursue a career in engineering if you are schooled for the whole of your education.
 
1. I made no mention of A-level maths, so once again, it's the strawman!

2. My argument was that by inculating an attitude toward math that was negative, not about her ability level. The arguments being presented on the thread were that homeschooling frees a child to learn what they want, whereas this, and the examples I posted, show that it's can be as much about what the parents want as what is good for the child.

3. More to the point, her lack of ability at maths had nothing to do with her potential aptitude for it - it was all down to her parents

I don't think I can be any clearer than this...
 
IF they sit a maths A level yes...or something related such as physics
If they dont then its really not important for them to know how to perform complicated algebra for instance...

This is where the argument about home education that Gmarthews and Kyser -soze are trying to present falls flat.
Home educated children are only required to study to their age, ability and aptitude and any special needs they may have.

If they arent apt at maths, arguing that you are forclosing careers to them is a nonsense. You are no more limited by your home education in terms of careers than you would be at school. If you dont like maths and arent good at it ( and many people arent mathematically minded- particularly if talented at english or artistic subjects) then you are just as unlikely to pursue a career in engineering if you are schooled for the whole of your education.


I enjoyed "useless" alegebra actually :o Not that I can remember owt. It's all there for a reason. I agree that numeracy and maths GCSE aren't the same thing, but I wouldn't try cutting out even more on the syllabus.

Maths GCSE is required for a lot of jobs -- not all, thankfully. However just because someone isn't that good at it at 17 doesn't mean to say they can't get better and later pass it.

Two of my friends did so in their thirties!

It's all a bit silly, tho, I have got maths GCSE but would fail it totally if I had to sit it tomorrow...
 
Kyser are you having an off day? No-one's saying you did say that!! :confused:

Yes there will be bad home edders, there's always gonna be parents who don't teach their kids the right things, or install a bad attitude in them about something, but that's not limited to home edding, that's just parenthood! :)
 
1. I made no mention of A-level maths, so once again, it's the strawman!

2. My argument was that by inculating an attitude toward math that was negative, not about her ability level. The arguments being presented on the thread were that homeschooling frees a child to learn what they want, whereas this, and the examples I posted, show that it's can be as much about what the parents want as what is good for the child.

3. More to the point, her lack of ability at maths had nothing to do with her potential aptitude for it - it was all down to her parents

I don't think I can be any clearer than this...
1..You didnt- _angel_ did!

2..children learn negative attitudes about maths in school...
take this thread for instance http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=252644&highlight=Maths

its pretty common to believe you are bad and maths and even acceptable to admit so.. surely not all people who believe they are bad at maths are home educated?
Therefore its a nonsense to suggest that its down to home education which makes her believe shes bad at maths or her parents. Its human nature to struggle at some things and not abnormal it seems for her to be also admitting she believes she cant do it.

3.. if people who are SCHOOLED can admit that they dont have an apititude for maths why isnt it their parents fault when they admit it?

Now for the love of god, please, read the thread, sober up, calm down.. whatever you have to do....
 
1. I made no mention of A-level maths, so once again, it's the strawman!

No, LMHF was responding to something I wrote about why a lot of GCSE Maths is "useless".


2. My argument was that by inculating an attitude toward math that was negative, not about her ability level. The arguments being presented on the thread were that homeschooling frees a child to learn what they want, whereas this, and the examples I posted, show that it's can be as much about what the parents want as what is good for the child.

3. More to the point, her lack of ability at maths had nothing to do with her potential aptitude for it - it was all down to her parents

I don't think I can be any clearer than this...


Yes -- there are some parents who are shit and home ed...?? Your point??

Sadly parents downers on education (or obsession in certain areas) can still negatively affect a child in school as well....
 
It shows just how little you know or understand about home education or peoples reasons for chosing to do so.
You are really an offensive ignorant bloke arent you?

no. i just know what it's all about.

i've never met anyone who was 'educated at home' but i'm sure i wouldnt like them if i did. i've met a few folk who went to Rudolf Steiner schools and they've been bad enough.

school is a brilliant laugh. i had a top time; no money worries and always plenty to spend from flogging all the books and microphones and stuff you could nick, drugs a plenty and often shagging a good two or three girls in the same day.

a life that despite my efforts to maintain it i imagine one could only live today if you joined the diplomatic service.

to deprive a kid of five years of that seems to me an utter disgrace.

I reckon any parent into the idea of 'home-schooling' is a Josef Fitzl in the making.
 
You enjoyed school, many many people do not.
So for those people you wouldnt be 'depriving' them of anything other than bullying, the constant peer pressure, pecking order and an unruly, uncomtrolled environment in which they dont thrive.

Most home educated children are home educated because they want to be, not because they have to be and the underlying philosophy of many home educating parents is autonomy which means the child gets to learn in the way which suits them best- if that means the child then says "I want to go to school" then that means they go.. its their choice.

To say "I havent met any but im sure I wouldnt like them" shows just how ridiculous your arguments are and that no, you dont know the first thing about it, youve just grasped a few ill thought out prejudices and stereotypes and applied them before proudly pronouncing you know how it is...
Thanks for displaying your complete ignorance so ably for us all. You really do look silly and especially oiffensive and troll like with your Joseph Fritzl comments
 
You enjoyed school, many many people do not.
So for those people you wouldnt be 'depriving' them of anything other than bullying, the constant peer pressure, pecking order and an unruly, uncomtrolled environment in which they dont thrive.

Most home educated children are home educated because they want to be, not because they have to be and the underlying philosophy of many home educating parents is autonomy which means the child gets to learn in the way which suits them best- if that means the child then says "I want to go to school" then that means they go.. its their choice.

To say "I havent met any but im sure I wouldnt like them" shows just how ridiculous your arguments are and that no, you dont know the first thing about it, youve just grasped a few ill thought out prejudices and stereotypes and applied them before proudly pronouncing you know how it is...
Thanks for displaying your complete ignorance so ably for us all. You really do look silly.

haha, I'M the one who looks silly? Most home educated children are home educated because they want to be ??? :confused:

what utter fanny batter. All kids say "I don't want to go to school" however most learn , at the age of around four, that just as they can't go and join a circus or live on the moon eating cheeese sticks dipped in nutella all day this isn't going to fucking happen. Anyone who teaches their kid at home is just being selfish, a control freak and imposing their own deluded agenda on a poor unfortunate child who will grow up an unsocialised freak incapable of relating to social environments and adversities.

So for those people you wouldnt be 'depriving' them of anything other than bullying, the constant peer pressure, pecking order and an unruly, uncomtrolled environment in which they dont thrive.

unlike the 'controlled environment' of Fitzl's cellar, of course? ;)
 
no. i just know what it's all about.

i've never met anyone who was 'educated at home' but i'm sure i wouldnt like them if i did. i've met a few folk who went to Rudolf Steiner schools and they've been bad enough.

school is a brilliant laugh. i had a top time; no money worries and always plenty to spend from flogging all the books and microphones and stuff you could nick, drugs a plenty and often shagging a good two or three girls in the same day.

a life that despite my efforts to maintain it i imagine one could only live today if you joined the diplomatic service.

to deprive a kid of five years of that seems to me an utter disgrace.

I reckon any parent into the idea of 'home-schooling' is a Josef Fitzl in the making.
You almost had me going there, you cheeky scampster.
 
All the home schooled I've met have the overriding personality trait of expecting to get what they want, and most have had a markedly selfish streak...
 
All the home schooled I've met have the overriding personality trait of expecting to get what they want, and most have had a markedly selfish streak...


That's not limited to home edding though kyser! :D

Are there support groups around for home schoolers? Or ways to interact with other home schoolers? :)
 
OK, everyone keeps saying 'That's not limited to home schooling...'...well, this thread is about home schooling and it's benefits, not everything else and how the rest of the world spews up the same results. My point is that far from being so far and away from traditional schooling, are the results really any different?
 
Loads :) Most cities have several groups a week you can choose from as well as other actvities such as trips and workshops kids can attend.

If you were home educating in a rural area your groups choices would be a little more limited and would involve a bit of travelling but some children dont enjoy spending lots of time at groups, others love it.
 
OK, everyone keeps saying 'That's not limited to home schooling...'...well, this thread is about home schooling and it's benefits, not everything else and how the rest of the world spews up the same results. My point is that far from being so far and away from traditional schooling, are the results really any different?

BUt you cannot raise criticisms of people and lay the blame at the foot of their education being at home without pointing out that the rest of the people who attend schools can and do behave in EXACTLY the same way.
Your anti maths analogy for instance...

IM sure the results arent neccessarily that different for some children, for others they wouldnt get the education they get at home at school- which is why theyve been removed and educated at home. usually because they cannot cope in school for whatever reason ( as Angel pointed out its often due to the LEA's refusal to meet a childs special educational needs) or because they are gifted and the school refuses to differentiate work for them ( although these children often win scholarships to independent schools which will make provisions for the very able)
 
The funniest thing is until this thread it was something I'd consider, but it looks like it's an approach stuffed to the gills with the ardently self-righteous.
 
All the home schooled I've met have the overriding personality trait of expecting to get what they want, and most have had a markedly selfish streak...

heh, that's hardly surprising!!

"baw baaw baaaaaw...mummy! MUMMY! I DON'T WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL!!" :mad::mad::mad:

"OK buttercup, what mummy's little darling wants...mummy's little darling gets" :)
 
If you were home educating in a rural area your groups choices would be a little more limited and would involve a bit of travelling but some children dont enjoy spending lots of time at groups, others love it.

so, if your kid didn't want to 'spend lots of time in groups' and preferred to spend its time sitting in the bath full of its own filth chopping up earth-worms with a scalpel blade , s'pose that'd be fine with you too? :confused:
 
haha, I'M the one who looks silly? Most home educated children are home educated because they want to be ??? :confused:

what utter fanny batter. All kids say "I don't want to go to school" however most learn , at the age of around four, that just as they can't go and join a circus or live on the moon eating cheeese sticks dipped in nutella all day this isn't going to fucking happen. Anyone who teaches their kid at home is just being selfish, a control freak and imposing their own deluded agenda on a poor unfortunate child who will grow up an unsocialised freak incapable of relating to social environments and adversities.

So for those people you wouldnt be 'depriving' them of anything other than bullying, the constant peer pressure, pecking order and an unruly, uncomtrolled environment in which they dont thrive.

unlike the 'controlled environment' of Fitzl's cellar, of course? ;)

What about the parents forced to do this because no school will take their kids? Special needs are not catered for properly and for a lot of kids it's being forced into a mainstream environment without the appropriate help.

I thought nowhere was going to accept my special needs son when he started last year! I must have seen about ten schools and it was only at the absolute last minute something became available.

Stories like this one of special needs kids escaping from mainstream schools don't help. If it were your kid you thought not only wasn't receiving an education, but actually placed in physical danger, would it be so 'stupid' to home school them in the absence of anything else?


Fury as autistic pupil escapes three times

Wednesday, 9th July 2008

A YOUNG autistic boy has escaped from lessons at a Sheffield school
for the third time in a year - even though he is supposed to be
constantly supervised.

Eleven-year-old Regan Congreve, who also has attention-deficit
hyperactivity disorder, disappeared during a lesson at Concord
Junior, Wincobank, and escaped from the grounds by climbing over a
high fence.

Regan - whose mother Lindsey Cassim says has no sense of danger -
first disappeared last summer when he left school and made his way to
Meadowhall shopping centre, where his mum was working at the time.
And on the second occasion, last autumn term, the youngster was
spotted wandering along a Wincobank street by his old headteacher.

Now angry Lindsey, who says Regan is supposed to have constant
supervision, has withdrawn him from school.

Lindsey, of Wheata Road, Ecclesfield, said: "I received a phone call
from school to say Regan had gone from his class and they were unsure
whether he was still on the premises.

"I was distraught. Regan has ADHD and autistic spectrum disorder and
he has no sense of danger.

"Without supervision, anything could have happened to him. As it
turned out, he had left school and ended up at his nannan's house."

Lindsey said Regan's special needs meant he was supposed to have
constant supervision from a classroom assistant.

She said: "Given that is the case I don't know what went wrong. But I
am withdrawing him from school until he is ready to start at
Ecclesfield secondary in September."

Lindsey claimed that on previous occasions Regan had simply been able
to walk through the school gates, which were unlocked in case of
deliveries.

She said: "I feel the school does not handle his condition well - to
my mind they say things to him which amount to bullying. He doesn't
like confrontation and, although he is no angel, he does get upset
easily.

"It seems that on the latest occasion a teacher had said something
about 'wait till you get to Ecclesfield where the big boys are' and
he got upset.

"What I can't understand is why the school did not call police
straight away when a vulnerable child had gone missing."

Concord Junior School declined to comment.But Marium Haque, senior
manager for Sheffield Council children's services department,
said: "We share the mother's concern, and are working with the school
to look at their safety and supervision procedures. Our staff are
visiting this week to carry out a thorough assessment of safety
measures."
 
Oh and four is waaaay too young for some, not all children, some countries don't start school till six..

..and bearing in mind a lot of them start at nursery in a school at three... for some children it is a bit too much formality so young..
 
Back
Top Bottom