Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

"Homeless chic" used to flog £500 trainers

I think my first three cars had a combined cost - if not necessarily value - of £600...
I reckon you could pick up a passable runner from the auction for less than £600 even today.
How the fuck can a hoodie be worth £600? It doesn't look any different from the Primark ones, I'm sure its made of better material but it can't be worth 50x as much.
 
did you spunk £600 on any single item of clothing when you were a teenager? the most expensive things i bought were dms (£50 iirc) and a leather jacknet - again £50.
My 16 year old bought a pair of pre-ripped jeans from Hollisters over the holidays which cost her north of £40 which I thought ridiculous, I suggested she get a pair from Primark and I would lend her a Stanley knife
I was accused of not getting fashion which is probably true but it's hard to see how one set of holes can be more fashionable than another.
But she would find a £600 hoodie as ridiculous as I do, a £40 hoodie maybe, you could at least understand that it might be much better quality than a £15 one but paying £600 is just pure added snobbery, look at me I am so rich I can afford to pay 10-12x what a regular person would pay for the same hoodie because I am so rich that I can.
 
My 16 year old bought a pair of pre-ripped jeans from Hollisters over the holidays which cost her north of £40 which I thought ridiculous, I suggested she get a pair from Primark and I would lend her a Stanley knife
I was accused of not getting fashion which is probably true but it's hard to see how one set of holes can be more fashionable than another.
But she would find a £600 hoodie as ridiculous as I do, a £40 hoodie maybe, you could at least understand that it might be much better quality than a £15 one but paying £600 is just pure added snobbery, look at me I am so rich I can afford to pay 10-12x what a regular person would pay for the same hoodie because I am so rich that I can.
fucking £600. it's sickening.
 
did you spunk £600 on any single item of clothing when you were a teenager? the most expensive things i bought were dms (£50 iirc) and a leather jacknet - again £50.
No I didn't. Even now I get ~80% of my clothes from a charity shop. I've got no problem with thinking that price is absurd. You're shifting the argument now though. I was talking about the thread title which is whether they are using 'homeless chic' which I really don't see as they're using a standard hoodie pose (which of course homeless people will use too)
 
No I didn't. Even now I get ~80% of my clothes from a charity shop. I've got no problem with thinking that's absurd. Your shifting the argument now though. I was talking about the thread title which is whether they are using 'homeless chic' which I really don't see as they're using a standard hoodie pose (which of course homeless people will use too)
forget the upper body pose, which yeh people do commonly use. the whole body pose, the sitting cross-legged looking down, i don't see how you can see that as other than reminiscent of a homeless person as we see them every day in london. if they were standing up, you'd have a point. as it is you don't.
 
I don't think people who buy £600 hoodies are likely to be jealous of the swagger of the street-dwellers of Piccadilly Gardens, so I guess a provocative window display like this must have another purpose.
 
ting is I can see myself talking myself into the 500 pound trainers if I was reasonably wealthy, yet not the hoodie. Trainers somehow different. Obvs the display is a bit fucked but *alan voice* these people.
 
The fashion industry has a long history of tone deaf styling and merchandizing. Karl Lagerfeld and John Galliano, anyone?
 
I wouldn't have thought the mannequins were meant to be mimicking homeless people.if I'd seen the photo wlthout the OP.

Haven't decided if that's me being dim yet.
 
I'll stick my neck out as well and say I'm also unconvinced about this looking like "homeless chic".

Looks as much like my late husband rolling a joint as it does like someone sitting on the streets.
 
Do might be being dense here but I don't see anything that screams homelessness. At a push the manaquin laying down could be a homeless person but also could be someone crashed out after a training session. You've gotta really squint to see homeless chic here.

The sitting figures are absolutely as you see people in the street.

Personally, I think any wankstain that pays £600.00 for a sweatshirt should be put up against a wall.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom