Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hierarchy of Oppression

tbaldwin said:
Even by your standards that is a very poor arguement for supporting privellege.

I'm not arguing to support privilege. That'd be obvious to most people, but I suspect you'll need to read my post a few times before you "get it".
 
The single largest de-motivating factor for the working classes is still fear of debt,

I disagree - perhaps among the w/c whose families actually imbued the aspiration to go to uni, but my own experience was more that many of the people in the community I grew up with simply saw uni as something 'we' didn't do, that leaving school at 16 and getting a job was a more responsible thing to do etc. One of the most memorable conversations I had with a neighbour was when I was 15 and she asked me what I wanted to do 'when I'd left school in a few weeks' and I told her that I wasn't, I was going to uni, and she said 'Our sort don't go to universities, do you think you're above us all then?'
 
All true Kyser, but it's also the case that the average debt that new graduates are leaving with is much larger than when you or I went to uni.

I don't think I would have gone had the debt burden been as large as it is today.
 
ViolentPanda said:
I'm not arguing to support privilege. That'd be obvious to most people, but I suspect you'll need to read my post a few times before you "get it".

If your arguing that more money should go to the lucky 1-2% of the worlds population has a higher education thats exactly what your doing.
 
ffs, barely more than that get an education past 12, so by your logic we should only be concerned with primary education
 
belboid said:
ffs, barely more than that get an education past 12, so by your logic we should only be concerned with primary education

Not true.

And its not what im saying anyway. I think the Left if they had even an ounce of Internationalism or Class perspective would stop talking about student poverty or student hardship.
 
Fruitloop said:
Why not just assess parental income? Wouldn't that be fairer?

The problem with that is that some parents used to , in anticipation of Tarquin and Jemima going to uni, take out massive HP agreements or second mortgages to reduce their core income. It meant that some people who didn't actually deserve or need state assistance got it.
 
kyser_soze said:
I disagree - perhaps among the w/c whose families actually imbued the aspiration to go to uni, but my own experience was more that many of the people in the community I grew up with simply saw uni as something 'we' didn't do, that leaving school at 16 and getting a job was a more responsible thing to do etc. One of the most memorable conversations I had with a neighbour was when I was 15 and she asked me what I wanted to do 'when I'd left school in a few weeks' and I told her that I wasn't, I was going to uni, and she said 'Our sort don't go to universities, do you think you're above us all then?'
Never experienced that at all, although I didn't stay on at school, I did my higher ed out of my own pocket, and later in life, but I had a few contemporaries from the Arndale estate in Wandsworth (called something different now, I believe, a spot of "gilding the turd") who went straight on, and most people were made up for them that they might have got on the path out of the shit-hole.
 
tbaldwin said:
If your arguing that more money should go to the lucky 1-2% of the worlds population has a higher education thats exactly what your doing.

I'll say it again: Go back and read my post properly. That's not what I argued.

Are you this thick for a bet, or is it natural?
 
tbaldwin said:
Not true.
Which bit, the percentage of over-12s, or the logic?
And its not what im saying anyway. I think the Left if they had even an ounce of Internationalism or Class perspective would stop talking about student poverty or student hardship.
Most people who call themselves "socialists" believe in levelling-up, you're espousing levelling down. Just like the tories have for the last 70 years.

Well done.
 
1-2% is obviously not entirely accurate, it is a minority of the worlds population tho.

I don't know a single socialist who doesn't campaign for vastly improved primary and secondary education as well as for tertiary ed. Only tb seems to believe that doing so is impossible. Odd bugger
 
belboid said:
1-2% is obviously not entirely accurate, it is a minority of the worlds population tho.

I don't know a single socialist who doesn't campaign for vastly improved primary and secondary education as well as for tertiary ed. Only tb seems to believe that doing so is impossible. Odd bugger

Who was the great Socialist who said "Socialism was the language of priorities" Jeremy Beadle ?

Who was the great historical figure who said "Let them eat cake" Tony Benn?
 
ViolentPanda said:
I don't believe I've mentioned spelling and grammar (you'll find, if you look, that another poster did so).
What I did do was point out to Mr. Baldwin that if he wished to find out the meaning of certain phrases that he claimed (somewhat disingenuously imo, as he hasn't had any trouble with those same phrases before) to not understand, that he could resolve his ignorance of them rather quickly if he cared to.
Mr. Baldwin enjoys playing his "salt of the earth, no-nonsense man of the people" card, and often reminds us he has little or no truck with higher education. Personally I find his faux-proletarian affectations nauseating.

I don't really understand why he annoys you quite this much, but then its non of my buisness.

To be perfectly honest my last post was a bit pointless, more a product of being pissed off with the world than anything else.

Mind you, now that we're simultaneously on to subjects of higher education and posting styles...

It strikes me that its much easier to self-educate these days with the internet, and that boards like this (broadly speaking) and sites like wikipedia (treated with caution) offer as much in the way of education as a univerisity degree. The question of actual training is very different of course, but in a purist education-for-its-own-sake sense I can't get romantic about university education. It might be a little pretentious but I think it would be healthy to regard boards like this as being partly education centres (of a sort) and we can think of ourselves as being educators/students (in a way) and that it would be good to think about how to go about this in the best way.
 
Knotted said:
I don't really understand why he annoys you quite this much...
Two things, his dogmatism, and his unbending cconviction that he's right, even when he's proven wrong.
...but then its non of my buisness.
True. :)
To be perfectly honest my last post was a bit pointless, more a product of being pissed off with the world than anything else.

Mind you, now that we're simultaneously on to subjects of higher education and posting styles...

It strikes me that its much easier to self-educate these days with the internet, and that boards like this (broadly speaking) and sites like wikipedia (treated with caution) offer as much in the way of education as a univerisity degree. The question of actual training is very different of course, but in a purist education-for-its-own-sake sense I can't get romantic about university education. It might be a little pretentious but I think it would be healthy to regard boards like this as being partly education centres (of a sort) and we can think of ourselves as being educators/students (in a way) and that it would be good to think about how to go about this in the best way.
In terms of self-education (and, for that matter, home education) the internet has certainly made research easier, and I'd broadly agree with your quantification of the quality of material being similar.
My problem is that we have a situation in the UK (and, IMHO, many other countries) where critical thinking skills aren't taught until higher education, whereas if they were taught as part of standard (non-sixth form) secondary education, then people would be provided with the tools necessary to self-educate to their hearts' content.
I don't think it's at all pretentious to say that bulletin boards may, very broadly, act as educational sites, insofar as they often draw people into proximity with ideas and concepts that they might not usually come across. I know I've pretty much been an eternal student in terms of continually and actively seeking to add to the sum of my knowledge, and boards like Urban have sent me down intellectual avenues I might otherwise have not bothered exploring.

Vocational and technical training and self-education is, of course, another thing entirely. It's hard to self-educate when there's so little access to the building blocks of basic technical training nowadays.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Two things, his dogmatism, and his unbending cconviction that he's right, even when he's proven wrong.

True. :)

In terms of self-education (and, for that matter, home education) the internet has certainly made research easier, and I'd broadly agree with your quantification of the quality of material being similar.
My problem is that we have a situation in the UK (and, IMHO, many other countries) where critical thinking skills aren't taught until higher education, whereas if they were taught as part of standard (non-sixth form) secondary education, then people would be provided with the tools necessary to self-educate to their hearts' content.
I don't think it's at all pretentious to say that bulletin boards may, very broadly, act as educational sites, insofar as they often draw people into proximity with ideas and concepts that they might not usually come across. I know I've pretty much been an eternal student in terms of continually and actively seeking to add to the sum of my knowledge, and boards like Urban have sent me down intellectual avenues I might otherwise have not bothered exploring.

Vocational and technical training and self-education is, of course, another thing entirely. It's hard to self-educate when there's so little access to the building blocks of basic technical training nowadays.

My view is that all higher education is essentially vocational even if it isn't treated that way. If you do an academic degree you are basically being trained as an academic. I could go on but it really deserves its own thread and to be perfectly honest, although I've got strong views on the subject, I haven't really put them into a coherent whole in my mind, so maybe another time...
 
ViolentPanda said:
Two things, his dogmatism, and his unbending cconviction that he's right, even when he's proven wrong.

.

I think a lot of people will agree with you on this VP.
But i would say that my views are pragmatic. Cos i believe that the majority of people should decide what happens in this world not me not you not any elite....
Perhaps i'm a Dogmatic Pragmatist?
 
tbaldwin said:
I think a lot of people will agree with you on this VP.
But i would say that my views are pragmatic. Cos i believe that the majority of people should decide what happens in this world not me not you not any elite....
Perhaps i'm a Dogmatic Pragmatist?

You say your views are pragmatic because you believe that "the majority of people etc etc"?
How does that make your views pragmatic? It makes your views the opposite of "pragmatic", it makes them idealistic.

Get yourself a dictionary, you total fucking gimboid.

(shakes head in despair that balders has yet again totally arsefucked the English language)
 
ViolentPanda said:
You say your views are pragmatic because you believe that "the majority of people etc etc"?
How does that make your views pragmatic? It makes your views the opposite of "pragmatic", it makes them idealistic.

Get yourself a dictionary, you total fucking gimboid.

(shakes head in despair that balders has yet again totally arsefucked the English language)

Why would i want to do that, when ive got you around?

Anyway comrade. Am i now to be considered a dogmatic idealist?
 
Back
Top Bottom