Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

HBOS merges with Lloyds

Interesting to see how the govt has deliberately "over ruled" competition laws in the "interests of the nation". How convenient.
 
North of the border, they can call it The Savings Bank of Scotland.
Apparently not. It'll be Lloyds-Halifax. But "we" get to keep the name Bank of Scotland on bank notes. Which is a nice useful thing, and a comfort to the thousands who'll lose their jobs.
 
That's logical, although I assume they will keep the Bank of Scotland as a trading name, at least north of the border.

BBC is reporting they will continue to print & issue Bank of Scotland notes, which confirms they will keep that name.
 
BBC is reporting they will continue to print & issue Bank of Scotland notes, which confirms they will keep that name.
Not according to BBC Radio Scotland, or the Scottish edition of the Times, or the Scotsman (both of which I have n front of me).

The name will remain on notes only. (The notes were BoS for the 7 years the company was called HBOS).
 
Not according to BBC Radio Scotland, or the Scottish edition of the Times, or the Scotsman (both of which I have n front of me).

The name will remain on notes only. (The notes were BoS for the 7 years the company was called HBOS).

But what was the name on the branch offices, still BoS? Down south the Halifax branch network remained branded as Halifax, with the addition of the BoS branding for business banking - they never re-branded as HBOS.

I can't see Llloyd's dropping the BoS branding in Scotland - the brand is far too strong.
 
I don't know. The reason that Lloyds were a logical choice was because alone of pretty much all the banks, they have maintained very strict lending controls through the cycle. Consequently, they do not have the subprime problems and they have a lot of liquidity. The whole point of this is that the combined entity is trouble-free.

Yes but now as a consequence they have lots of dodgy loans, and with global banks going under who knows where they have put their money (probably dodgy american stocks etc.)..

You can't polish a turd.
 
Yes but now as a consequence they have lots of dodgy loans.
Apparently not. I haven't seen the books personally, but we're told HBOS was well capitalised, and that the run was a result of short selling. (Traders selling securities they don't own. Effectively betting on the bank in the hope of making money).
 
I don't know. The reason that Lloyds were a logical choice was because alone of pretty much all the banks, they have maintained very strict lending controls through the cycle. Consequently, they do not have the subprime problems and they have a lot of liquidity. The whole point of this is that the combined entity is trouble-free.

I don't know much about it, but according to the paper this morning Halifax wasn't actually in any trouble at all. This is all down to speculation and the evil share dealers selling shares they don't have to make a profit.

e2a: LOL, danny got there first!

this is all very fucked up indeed. and full of wrongness
 
Well now I don't really get it. Just because a banks share price tumbles, why does that mean that it has to be sold? Can't it just wait out the speculation? Or is it purely a question of confidence?
 
It was, yes, in the HBOS years. But that isn't what's being reported this morning.

The reports could be wrong, but they say Lloyds-Halifax will be the branding on all but the notes.

Well only time will tell, but I can’t see it myself, the BoS name has far too much history behind it in Scotland and every BoS note is basically an advert for it, I wouldn’t mind betting a £100 they will keep the name for more than just the notes.
 
Well now I don't really get it. Just because a banks share price tumbles, why does that mean that it has to be sold? Can't it just wait out the speculation? Or is it purely a question of confidence?
Because it was losing value in the magnitude of a third its value in an hour.

At that rate either the government nationalizes, or a buyer is found. The government seems to have brokered the deal, so it clearly didn't want to nationalize another bank.
 
Well now I don't really get it. Just because a banks share price tumbles, why does that mean that it has to be sold? Can't it just wait out the speculation? Or is it purely a question of confidence?
A lack of confidence in the very real issue of whether it can survive its exposure in the property market, no?
 
Well now I don't really get it. Just because a banks share price tumbles, why does that mean that it has to be sold? Can't it just wait out the speculation? Or is it purely a question of confidence?

/dramatic mode on

Because there are some really greedy people out there and shareholders are stupid people who only care about their 'investments'...

I hope they're happy that because of their greed/hysteria there are potentially 40,000 people out of a job.

Do share dealers ever get fired for ruining people's lives? They should
 
Because it was losing value in the magnitude of a third its value in an hour.
So what, though? If you own an investment that you believe is fundamentally sound and some stupid bear market decides to temporarily undervalue it, do you sell it at its lowest ebb or do you just wait it out?

At that rate either the government nationalizes, or a buyer is found.
Apparently so, but I still don't really see why that has to happen.
 
A lack of confidence in the very real issue of whether it can survive its exposure in the property market, no?
But we're now being told that it doesn't actually have any problems from exposure int he property market. The owners of the business who can actually see the management accounts must know this, so why sell it at fire-sale prices?
 
So what, though? If you own an investment that you believe is fundamentally sound and some stupid bear market decides to temporarily undervalue it, do you sell it at its lowest ebb or do you just wait it out?

Apparently so, but I still don't really see why that has to happen.
That's the illogicality of the market. 2 things are wrong here:

- people do sell on a falling market (logic tells you to hold on and sell on a rising market).

- traders are allowed to sell securities they don't own.
 
This is why I don't trade shares or any related instruments, incidentally. I never could get my head around the mob mentality that drives it.
 
Losers here will be ordinary, working class bank staff who are losing their jobs

Winners are the tory hedge fund speculators who brought about this part of the imevitable crisis in capitalism

Worry up her is scotland seems to be more about whether we will lose our BOS bank notes, which shows the mentality of some people
 
Back
Top Bottom