I've never voted for either of them. I never bought into Blair and always saw what he was about from the start, tbh. I can remember predicting what would likely happen under a Blair govt and few people wtning to know. Most either suported his rightwing agenda or deluded themselves into thinking he couldn't possibly mean it and would be different once in office.
I'm embarassed to say that voting "Labour" in '97 was an uninformed impulse on the way to the polling station. I'd consistently voted Liberal over the past 20 years as a quasi-Green option. While the Tories were solidly in power I'd felt my vote was not going to make a difference anyway...
I voted "Labour" a second time in 2001 because it seemed "the right thing to do."
Then 9/11 happened, followed by two wars I hadn't voted for ... took much too long for the penny to drop. I was ill in bed and appropriately feverish with a kidney infection while CNN were covering the Iraq invasion and I remember waiting for them to find the chemical weapons ..... I spent so much time fighting my own demons over the past 30 years that even the Thatcher era and the Falklands had been a meaningless blur...
So the shit represented by the
changeling Blair didn't get my vote in 2005.
(Am I the only one to notice that the inner circle of this government all have a peculiar way of speaking ?)
I wish I wasn't living in a safe "Labour" seat with a parachuted MP, so the party reps would come knocking and I could tell them all to fuck off - and why.
From now on I won't worry about voting for people who truly represent my priorities, but have absolutely no chance of winning, because it appears to make no difference whether it's Labour or Tory who are in power.