Personally, I thought Galloway is quite eloquent:
"I fully stand by it. Mr Blair has murdered more than 100,000 people in Iraq and the Iraqi people are an occupied people, illegally invaded. They have the moral and legal right to resist that occupation. Why would that right be restricted to the poor bloody infantry that Mr Blair sent into the streets of Iraq?
"If the Iraqis have a right to resist their invaders, they have a right to resist the officers of the invaders; and if they have the right to resist the officers, they have the right to resist those who are giving the officers their orders."
However, Mr Galloway reiterated his view, stated in the GQ article, that it would not be right to carry out a suicide attack on the Prime Minister because it would strengthen rather than weaken the pro-war camp in London and Washington.
He said he would alert the authorities if he knew of such a plan because it would be counterproductive. Instead, Mr Blair and President Bush should be tried in an international court as mass murderers. "I'm not calling for it and I don't want it to happen," he said. Asked if he should inform the authorities of an assassination attempt on the Prime Minister because it was wrong, Mr Galloway replied: "Mr Blair is the man who began the attacks; he's a mass murderer. You have to stand for a minute in the shoes of the Iraqis whose country has been invaded.
"Now if you ask me if my country was invaded by a foreign government, would I consider it morally my right to strike back at that foreign government, there can only be one answer to it."
Challenged to state that suicide bombing could never be justified, Mr Galloway cited remarks made by Cherie Blair in 2002, when she said that young Palestinians felt that they had "no hope" but to blow themselves up. He said: "The issue is not the method, whether it is a Stealth bomber or a suicide bomber, the issue is the target. If innocent civilian people are targeted by any weapon it is morally repugnant."
(one for me too, now we're quits). 
