Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Harmony Bar (Mingles/ George) on Railton Road up for sale

Incidentally, editor. How do you find these releases? Do they get sent to Buzz? or do you have some sort of trawling software? This luddite wants to know!
 
also, the idea that it's post-riot because the pub that originally existed on the site was burnt down for being racist back in 1981... as if somehow the successful long-term running of a well beloved community bar can be ignored because of something that happened 33 years ago. did the afro-carribean community somehow not count as life?
The landlord in it's "Mingles" period was a former Mayor of Lambeth (Afro Carribean) who is still to some extent connected with the Domino Club I believe.
 
How did Lambeth get their hands on it? I thought it belonged to Antic?

I never understood why Antic was unable to open a pub there - it has established use.:confused:
Isn't this just typical of Antic's modus operandi. They spark off doing stuff and if there is a significant obstacle drop it cash in and move on.

Look at the bar/restaurant they were going to open at the back of the Bon Marche building.

The biggest example is the development now known as "The Viaduct" in Coldharbour Lane. This was going to be an Anthony Thomas scheme, but he didn't square it with the planners and sold on to someone else who got plans approved and started building then went bust - so Lexadon cleaned up.
 
Isn't this just typical of Antic's modus operandi. They spark off doing stuff and if there is a significant obstacle drop it cash in and move on.

Sounds like sensible business practice to me.
 
We get sent quite a few but sometimes people mail them to us.
I was hoping for something a little more like 24's CTU :(

"There's been a mention of Brixton in a disused warehouse in E3. Patching intercepted infra red satellite images of the suspects to the nearest mods now. Back up is on the way."
 
Isn't this just typical of Antic's modus operandi. They spark off doing stuff and if there is a significant obstacle drop it cash in and move on.

Look at the bar/restaurant they were going to open at the back of the Bon Marche building.

The biggest example is the development now known as "The Viaduct" in Coldharbour Lane. This was going to be an Anthony Thomas scheme, but he didn't square it with the planners and sold on to someone else who got plans approved and started building then went bust - so Lexadon cleaned up.

To be fair Antic are really pub business not property developers. I agree when they get significant obstacle from planning they move on. How to put it? From what I have seen of them at planning committee its not their strong point. Its not intentional of them to cash in. They are better at running pubs.
 
To be fair Antic are really pub business not property developers. I agree when they get significant obstacle from planning they move on. How to put it? From what I have seen of them at planning committee its not their strong point. Its not intentional of them to cash in. They are better at running pubs.
I don't know - but I suspect that the proprietor started as a general developer, and has now found a niche. In retrospect the Viaduct is not a good example, because at the time A Thomas was evolving his plans Lambeth Planning were pretty committed to keeping that site as employment generating. Any developer would have had problems getting a residential scheme through.

Antic do have the shop/flats @ 304 Brixton Road by the way. The one where they got rid of the ornamental Victorian weather vane on a building in a conservation area.
del-jpg.32335
 
I don't know - but I suspect that the proprietor started as a general developer, and has now found a niche. In retrospect the Viaduct is not a good example, because at the time A Thomas was evolving his plans Lambeth Planning were pretty committed to keeping that site as employment generating. Any developer would have had problems getting a residential scheme through.

Antic do have the shop/flats @ 304 Brixton Road by the way. The one where they got rid of the ornamental Victorian weather vane on a building in a conservation area.
del-jpg.32335


For example, there is the suspicion that Antic has the Effra Social to exploit the potential development land behind.

Also, A Thomas has the scandalously hoarded site on Brixton Water Lane.
 
I think a lot of that land belongs to the houses on BWL. I remember nosing at one of those houses that was for sale and I couldn't believe how massive the garden was
 
I think a lot of that land belongs to the houses on BWL. I remember nosing at one of those houses that was for sale and I couldn't believe how massive the garden was
This is true. The plot behind The Social is the width of the building itself. You'd struggle to build anything much on that land due to the proximity to the houses running down the back. And then there is access. They would need to arrange access over the Housing Association's drive next door or along the private road at the rear of the large houses - which seems unlikely. They did used to have access onto that road but bricked it up a long time ago - not sure whether they retain some right of use but it is probably limited if they do.

They could buy some of the land behind the houses on BWL but they would still need to sort access.
 
Looks like theyre well under way at Harmony bar - scaffolding all the way around the building (so you cant walk on the pavement today... hope they fix that) and the inside looks like its been gutted.
 
According to the foreman, luxury flats are being built and the structure will have will have an extra floor added on top. Two retail units planned for ground floor.
 
Out of interest, what do people see as the key differences between a luxury flat and a standard flat?
 
Yep not sure what the genial foreman's definition of 'luxury' is...I agree about the cod retail units. Apparently the build is a partnership between private firm Sorrel and LB Lambeth so heaven knows what the result will be
 
Planning ref 12/04161/FUL

Fairly inoffensive stuff

harmony1.jpg

That's the Railton Road elevation. Retail unit on the corner, which also has access to the whole basement. Second retail unit on the right, with residential entrance between the two. Four 1-bed, two-2 bed and one 3-bed flats but they're far from what I'd call "luxury". "Pokey" is more accurate.
 
Planning ref 12/04161/FUL

Fairly inoffensive stuff

View attachment 65281

That's the Railton Road elevation. Retail unit on the corner, which also has access to the whole basement. Second retail unit on the right, with residential entrance between the two. Four 1-bed, two-2 bed and one 3-bed flats but they're far from what I'd call "luxury". "Pokey" is more accurate.

Will be interesting to see what happens with hte retail units - doesnt strike me that any of the shops near there are doing a roaring trade
 
Out of interest, what do people see as the key differences between a luxury flat and a standard flat?

The 'luxury' flats in the building next door to mine are 8 Sq Metres smaller than my (shared ownership, housing association) place and only single aspect, and I doubt the finish is any better.
 
Back
Top Bottom