Discussion in 'UK politics, current affairs and news' started by JTG, Jun 14, 2017.
from the Save the UK Fire Service facebook group - long but worth a read
I suggest you wind your neck in, read the words I typed, consider what I said, and then write out your apology.
If that's beyond you, then I suggest you simply stroll on and don't bother dirtying up the thread with anything further on this particular side-issue.
Astonishing, sobering stuff - thanks for sharing.
Here we go...
Council attacked for stockpiling £274m despite Grenfell Tower residents' calls for fire safety improvements
As well as the various funds to support the survivors, you can also donate to the Grenfell Action Group, the residents' group which raised safety concerns with KCTMO and RBKC before the fire:
To support The Grenfell Action Group Please donate to RHN account, marking donation 'GAG' - bank details are: s/c 08-92-99, acc no 65779994
or to Help raise £5000 to support the Grenfell Action Group Fighting Fund. Through campaigning and court cases we can bring those responsible for the fire to justice
(Via Solidarity with Residents of Grenfell Tower Facebook Group)
The article doesn't suggest where they were investing/keeping the profits other than a handback of £100 per household, do we have this info? I've been following the thread but do miss things.
Sorry I have no idea i am just really fucking angry. Cunts.
Been talking to my dad about this this afternoon (he's a professor of combustion engineering / fire engineering, ran one of the only fire engineering courses in the country for several decades).
It seems that the list of regulatory failures that led to this are quite a bit longer and go back further than I'd thought.
Stuff like the fact that the advice that people in tall buildings should stay in their flats, and shouldn't use the lifts to escape has been under review for something like 15 years without that review ever being concluded.
And he reckons that the building regs requirements for the fire rating of these cladding panels / insulation for tall buildings was reduced in the building regs revision in 2010 when it changed from a previous BS standard to a EN BS standard, but you'd have to actually have copies of each document to know this. The new regs specifically don't have any requirement for smoke / soot emissions or to prevent molten burning material from dripping and spreading the fire that way. Which is why the smoke was so bad, and molten burning material can be seen falling from the cladding.
Amongst other things that he's currently writing up a report on.
Says he's been making these points at conferences etc for years and being ignored.
The rebate/hardback was according to bimble's letter only 2014/15.
Link to that firefighter piece here, we need to get that shared as much as possible round Facebook to counter the lies being told about the operation:
I can't vouch for the accuracy, but here's a list of ACM cladding fires from around the world, that shows why these materials should have been banned for this use well before they were used on this cladding project, if the Secratary of State was vaguely competent / not under the influence of the cladding / building industry.
From a comment on this article Updated: Grenfell fire highlights ‘serious failure’ and cladding concerns
No mental gymnastics, just the political classes closing ranks and protecting their own, the cunts.
To be fair, Piers is one of my Facebook "friends", and he often veers off into some extremely unsavoury loonspudulence around climate change. Never seen him giving it the old "international bankers" schtick, mind, although he has more than a few followers who've obviously swallowed "The Protocols..." and every shitty diatribe Icke has ever written, whole.
Somewhat "homespun", but a favourite Youtuber of mine in Australia who's an amateur engineer and part-time bush fire-preventer happened to get his hands on some of this stuff and has spotted yet another weakness in its construction ...
Spoiler: youtube video
Can you explain what this weakness is? I'm afraid I'm not feeling up to wading through random videos
In the samples he has, there's actually a groove cut through the aluminium skin as part of the fixing process - so it's not like it's even a continuous skin.
great pic from one of yesterday's demos (found here)
500-600 dead according to this woman.
I haven't watched the video but that would mean 4-5 deaths per flat wouldn't it? Which seems a bit unlikely.
That woman is obviously distressed. Don't think anybody knows yet what the true death toll is. There are survivors who got out.
It seems unlikely to me too, and it's Press TV.
And the poster who's put it up is a pointless stirrer.
Pilgrim Tucker from Grenfell Action Group is on Marr, BBC1 now.
can anyone confirm this list's accuracy or not? 149 still missing according to it
Gathrer.com Grenfell Resident Status List
Interesting development reported by BBC just now.
Perhaps whoever is running things in No 10 right now have, belatedly, realised that the utter inability of KCBC to provide help to its citizens is making austerity look bad.
Grenfell Tower fire: Government staff sent into Kensington and Chelsea council - BBC News
It isn't a 'Birthday Bash' per se, it is the equivalent of 4th July for the USA or Bastille Day for France.
Separate names with a comma.