Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Green Berets

I don't like him much but I think in this thread Violent Panda has more credibility. Pbman does fit the profile of a chicken hawk.
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
Green-Berets-[UK-IMPORT].jpg

Not that 'The Green Berets' was universally panned by critics on its release as a piece of blatant, crude, offensive, biased, unintelligent and particularly obnoxious propaganda, of course....

I'm afraid it was actually.

And severely so at that.
 
Pilgrim said:
Not that 'The Green Berets' was universally panned by critics on its release as a piece of blatant, crude, offensive, biased, unintelligent and particularly obnoxious propaganda, of course....
.

Only by commies. :rolleyes:

It was and is quite populare around here.
 
kasheem said:
I don't like him much but I think in this thread Violent Panda has more credibility. Pbman does fit the profile of a chicken hawk.

Newbies commies support VP.

What a surprise.
 
pbman said:
Then you must be the one in 10,000 who don't atomaticaly say where they served...........



But how the heck would locals know you served in 1983 anyways? All it would prove is a previouse lie.

Lots of liberals lie about service in nam.

To their friends today.

The love the increas in in their crediblility on issues.

Anyways, just as you guys can sniff out racists, i can sniff out posers.

And your fitting the profile.

USA! But only Republicans! USA but only Republicans!


repeat until erect.
 
pbman said:
Pretty much. :)

Peebs innocent self-pleasuring fantasies about big soldier men, reminds me of this brilliant account of Western special forces I read on another newsgroup from 4 years ago -- at the time Don Rumsfeld said his first job would be capture Bin laden (if you can't remember the period it was around the same time that G. W. Bush was going to end terrorism) -- and the newspapers were indulging Peebs erotic thoughts by giving glorious accounts of 'elite units', prompting this analysis from the brilliant R. Smith:

US Delta Force

Havent seen much action since a series of Chuck Norris movies in the 80s, this was the unit that was famously brought in to Lebanon in the 80s to make not one jot of difference to the hostage crisis.

US Rangers

Still smarting after losing 18 men in Somalia, where they were pitted against an old Russian anti aircraft gun mounted on a Toyota truck and an angry mob. Should be a formidable force unless facing angry men with sticks.

Navy S.E.A.L.S.

Again not seen since Somalia, where they made their secret beach landing, in front of CNN. Experts at secret insertion missions. See their web site or call their PR office for details of their next attack.

Special Forces Green Berets

Experts in covert operations, these units are heavily equipped with acronyms and abbreviations. Trained in unconventional warfare some units are so special they arent even military. In fact one is rumoured to be a chip shop in Skipton.

SAS

Long the wanking fantasy of many British defence secretary, these troops proved in the Falklands that there was no one better at dealing with enemy untrained teenage conscripts. Famous Bravo Two Zero mission in Iraq unfortunately foiled by small boy with goat, but invaluable in Kosovo, working behind enemy lines to guide cruise missiles onto plywood dummy tanks, refugee columns etc


Incidentally, can anyone update me on how the war on terrorism is going? I take it that given the brilliance of the Green Berets that Bin Laden was captured some time ago -- i must have been watching The Top 100 Erotic Celebrity House-Swap Makeovers from Hell and missed the news.
 
pbman said:
Then you must be the one in 10,000 who don't atomaticaly say where they served...........

But how the heck would locals know you served in 1983 anyways? All it would prove is a previouse lie.

Lots of liberals lie about service in nam.

To their friends today.

The love the increas in in their crediblility on issues.

Anyways, just as you guys can sniff out racists, i can sniff out posers.

And your fitting the profile.
errr no, plenty of people round here know VP served in the Brit army.
try again! :rolleyes:
 
Ungrateful said:
Peebs innocent self-pleasuring fantasies about big soldier men, reminds me of this brilliant account of Western special forces I read on another newsgroup from 4 years ago -- at the time Don Rumsfeld said his first job would be capture Bin laden (if you can't remember the period it was around the same time that G. W. Bush was going to end terrorism) -- and the newspapers were indulging Peebs erotic thoughts by giving glorious accounts of 'elite units', prompting this analysis from the brilliant R. Smith:

US Delta Force

Havent seen much action since a series of Chuck Norris movies in the 80s, this was the unit that was famously brought in to Lebanon in the 80s to make not one jot of difference to the hostage crisis.

US Rangers

Still smarting after losing 18 men in Somalia, where they were pitted against an old Russian anti aircraft gun mounted on a Toyota truck and an angry mob. Should be a formidable force unless facing angry men with sticks.

Navy S.E.A.L.S.

Again not seen since Somalia, where they made their secret beach landing, in front of CNN. Experts at secret insertion missions. See their web site or call their PR office for details of their next attack.

Special Forces Green Berets

Experts in covert operations, these units are heavily equipped with acronyms and abbreviations. Trained in unconventional warfare some units are so special they arent even military. In fact one is rumoured to be a chip shop in Skipton.

SAS

Long the wanking fantasy of many British defence secretary, these troops proved in the Falklands that there was no one better at dealing with enemy untrained teenage conscripts. Famous Bravo Two Zero mission in Iraq unfortunately foiled by small boy with goat, but invaluable in Kosovo, working behind enemy lines to guide cruise missiles onto plywood dummy tanks, refugee columns etc
:D :D :D

Incidentally, everyone knows that the French Foreign Legion would fucking have the Green Berets and the Navy Seals for breakfast.
 
Red Jezza said:
errr no, plenty of people round here know VP served in the Brit army.
try again! :rolleyes:

I reckon I could post my medical discharge papers and he wouldn't be convinced.

Let him believe what he wants to believe. It probably reassures him that his unerring ability to detect "posers" allows him to sweep aside any opinion he disagrees with by claiming that the person is an imposter.

Poor sad bastard.
 
pbman said:
Its been my expiarane that anyone who did served would at the very least proudly identify, his branch of service.

I was in the navy,or army or marines or whatever.

But 9 timess out of ten they will say exatly were they served, as in i was in the navy on so and so ship..........

To do less than that is the classic sign of a poser.......

But pretty common among liberals, at least in the us.

Just to add, for the benefit of the fuckwitted (that means you).

British military personnel were (and probably still are, as the issue is ongoing) actively encouraged to not mouth off about their postings, mostly because we had a semi-Civil War situation going on in Ulster, and "loose lips sink ships".

Apart from that I don't need to justify myself to you.
 
Jesus Christ!

Why don't you all find a nice men's room, get a ruler, strip down and measure 'em.

I know, then the whole metric or standard debate starts. :rolleyes:
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
I wonder if all the brit soldiers policing the streets of northern ireland have this guy's sense of fair play?

correction dipshit British troops never policed Northern Ireland, thats why they always had to have an RUC/PSNI officier with them.

Secondly, it's been a very long time since British troops have been involved in day to day patrols, instead they tend to stand there and get the balls knocked off them in riots ala Drumcree.
 
revol68 said:
correction dipshit British troops never policed Northern Ireland, thats why they always had to have an RUC/PSNI officier with them.

Secondly, it's been a very long time since British troops have been involved in day to day patrols, instead they tend to stand there and get the balls knocked off them in riots ala Drumcree.
Not so much "tend to stand there" as get deployed there and aren't allowed to move unless you're given specific orders to.
Unlike the piggies you're not allowed to cut and run

BTW, I think the canuck meant "police" in terms of N.I. being perceived by Whitehall as what is euphemistically termed a "police/policing action", rather than the more realistic term "guerrilla war".
 
Poi E said:
what absinthe get banned for? They introduce a new FAQ outlawing dickheads?


No, but there really should be a section in the FAQs to ban posters who can think of nothing more intelligent than to call anyone with a different point of view a 'commie' in EVERY SINGLE BLEEDIN' POST THEY WRITE. Followed by :rolleyes:

It's just getting so tedious.
 
good ernie is such a cock, i mean it's not the winding up that bothers me, it's the completely shit way in which he does it, the guys a cretin.

As are you Red Jism.
 
Red Jezza said:
absinthe was (almost certainly) ernie

:D well now there's a surprise. Trolling wasn't as good as it used to be.

edit: Red Jism! That's nice one for you RJ. How you gonna come back from that? :D
 
revol68 said:
good ernie is such a cock, i mean it's not the winding up that bothers me, it's the completely shit way in which he does it, the guys a cretin.

As are you Red Jism.

As opposed to you who are a paragon of excellence in every field, no doubt?
:p
 
I actually like the green beret film but i guess it isn't supposed to be a comedy is it :) .Though every critic review I ve ever read takes pain to be as nasty as
possible about it with good reason .
 
dylanredefined said:
I actually like the green beret film but i guess it isn't supposed to be a comedy is it :) .Though every critic review I ve ever read takes pain to be as nasty as
possible about it with good reason .

Well, the sun sets in the east in one scene apparently. Not a good sign.
 
Poi E said:
:D well now there's a surprise. Trolling wasn't as good as it used to be.

edit: Red Jism! That's nice one for you RJ. How you gonna come back from that? :D
simple.
to revol68; read the FAQs you idiot.
post reported
and - btw - the only reason why I haven't responded to your other shit is because I am normally far too busy to bother with work to bother with the illiterate dribblings of some mentally incoherent, prepubescent teenage anarcho-squirt.
I'll just say this;
Grow up, you sad silly little boy!
and you might learn to write proper English whilst you are at it, you gibbering buffoon :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom