SpookyFrank
Don't swallow the cap
So apart from the war on terror reasons for this legislation, whivh never seem to stand up to much scrutiny, why else does this sort of thing get put onto the books?
Is it because there is actually quite a lot of public support for this if the question is phrased right, because people think it will always be used on actual terrorists?
Is it because the government anticipate greater civil unrest in future and want to have the right laws available to control the masses?
Or is it used as a crude policing tool, eg to intimidate people into ceasing disruptive protests, by telling them how long they could be detained for if they dont cooperate?
From the extent to which existing terrorism laws have already been used to curtail peaceful protest, freedom of speech, freedom of information etc I reckon it's safe to say these new powers will be abused left right and centre before the ink is dry on the statute book.



