agricola
a genuine importer of owls
I would not go so far as to say that I actually "despise" any of them.
Perhaps you should watch BBC Parliament more.
I would not go so far as to say that I actually "despise" any of them.
What do you mean? I have pointed out that the US treats non US citizens (with whom it does not have a "social contract") differently. But a US citizen (even one suspected of terrorist offences) has to be charged after 48 hours.
Well it seems Gordon Brown may get his way.
No doubt this will be trumpeted as evidence that he is not in as much trouble as people think.
Still amazing that not so long ago someone was asking for 90 days!
Sadly, I don't think we really qualify as of now.I meant, you'd be better off comparing us with a civilized country.
Oh, but you have to trust the nice government; they aren't baddies, they'll only do good things.Govt wins,
I wonder how long it will be before this power is used in an entirely different context, like the terrorism act has been
Oh, but you have to trust the nice government; they aren't baddies, they'll only do good things.
Oh, and DUP scum act according to type.
BLOODY ARSEHOLE BASTARDS
Fuckers.

... and the reason this was passed? Not because it was the right thing to do, but because it was made into a confidence vote on Gordon Brown by the whips and media it seems. Fucking idiots.![]()
... and the reason this was passed? Not because it was the right thing to do, but because it was made into a confidence vote on Gordon Brown by the whips and media it seems. Fucking idiots.![]()
According to the Beeb this morning Greece allows 12 months, but it's an exception.For what it's worth, the vote on this is today.
If it is passed, the Government will have crossed a Rubicon, and I for one will not be allowing it to lie.
The UK already has the longest period of pre-charge detention in the western world. The next longest is Australia at 12 days.
In the US, under the 2001 Patriot Act the attorney general can detain foreign suspects (for periods renewed 6 monthly) but must start deportation proceedings within 7 days. But under U.S. Federal law the maximum period of pre-charge detention for criminal suspects who are US citizens, including those suspected of committing terrorist offences is 48 hours. Anyone held longer can issue a writ of habeas corpus.
Anyone live near Runnymede? Perhaps that'd be a good locus for a protest if this is passed.
Fair point ... but if he'd have lost it would have been seen as a vote of no confidence ...True, but this is not a vote of confidence in him - he had to use one or two Tory rebels and the DUP to win the vote.
I'm not even sure what that means when applied to terror plots. How does an airplane or a train being blown up risk national security?We are told national security is at stake
BLOODY ARSEHOLE BASTARDS
Fuckers.
Fuck Brown the pathetic, idiotic, bumbling, has been, incompetent, idiotic prick. Man of principle my fucking arse, im glad he's going to go down in history as an absolute nonentity, a fucking footnote.
A fuck the careerist scum of the Labour benches, fucking sheep, morons dont realise half of them are gonna lose their seats anyway might as well have some fucking backbone and principle. What the hell did Brown have to twist their arms with? 'This will be the end of your political career' its already the end of their careers.
The only thing, really the only difference I can see between the parties at the moment was this, and the fucking tores were on the good side.
What the fuck is going on.
I am angered and disappointed by this vote. Congratulations Gordon Brown - you have just given the police and security forces of the United Kingdom the right to detain members of the public without charge for upto 42 days.
An assault on democracy, an affront to liberty.
This is to register my anger that you have voted in favour of 42 days detention without charge. I know your party's arguments for it so please don't repeat them when you reply to me. The arguments are not good enough. Anyone with guts and principles would be prepared to live with an infinitesimally increased risk for the sake of preserving our freedoms. Not you apparently.
But I do have a question for you. Is there any civil liberty you would not destroy if your party leaders demanded it? Is there any civil liberty you would risk your career for?
Thanks in advance for your reply.