butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Mr Callaghan's cab awaits.
So VP, tell us the film (and then whether a Labour leadership contest is possible and/or likely???)Your analogy features in the opening of a popular film. If you're lucky I'll actually remember which one!![]()

Not going to happen - even if there was a huge terror attack, Brown is extremely unlikely to appear as any kind of Churchillian figure (even with the lashings of media hype that Blair enjoyed pre-Iraq) - I would say that the only way he will hang on post 2009/10 is if the General Election was postponed.
So VP, tell us the film (and then whether a Labour leadership contest is possible and/or likely???)![]()
Unless you are somehow suggesting that Gordon Brown would launch a false-flag terror attack, this seems rather unlikely.
The film, IIRC, was "Ghost Dog", and IMHO a leadership contest is unlikely this close to a general election, purely because if Brown loses then a new party leader can play "new broom", and if he wins, those who've undermined him will find themselves banished to the hinterlands of the back benches.
can't see any of the young uns wanting the job right now tbh. I think many in the party know they're fucked with Brown in charge so if there's a push to get him out it would surely be Straw to mind the shop and possibly pull off the miracle Brown can't and save their arses.
For Straw's part, if he waits until after the election loss he must know it'd be a younger man who will get the gig so this could be his only chance.
Possibly anyway.
regardless of being a reactionary phoney liar and blood on his hands tosser, Jack Straw may well become plan b as a kind of Michael Howard role.
Matthew Parris said very sensibly in The Times yesterday that Labour politicians would recognise the value of merely losing the election, as opposed to losing by a landslide. Getting rid of Brown is a cheap and easy way of buying electoral appeal and they should have the sense to do so.
Ah right, never really seen it...


Can't see what he could or couldn't do over next 4 weeks to make much of a difference. More depressingly, the unions have signed up to the welfare policies of increased privatisation of employment support services as well as forcing lone parents to seek work, which proves that Purnell is pushing himself into the limelight.
Yes, at the policy forum apparently.What does that mean, have they actually signed up to it at Warwick, etc.If so, then the Unions are part of the problem not the solution.
You haven't seen "Ghost Dog"?
Now that's what I call deprivation!!

what makes you think backbench MPs are any better?
Because many of them vote with their constituents interests at heart not the minsters'

The main problem being that even a sniff of power is usually enough to turn the staunchest back-bencher into a neo-liberal cocksucker of the highest order.![]()