danny la rouge
Ninja swords for all disabled people
BBC has this.Just came across this and couldn't find any mention via search.
BBC has this.Just came across this and couldn't find any mention via search.
Scottish Labour backed calls for a probe into why "an SNP government department lost confidential personal data again".
A spokesman for the party added: "Lindsay Roy won the by-election because of the incompetence of the SNP locally and nationally.

It does seem remarkable that as soon as questions are raised the evidence 'disappears'. I'd have thought material pertaining to the running of elections would be held under strict protocol and diligence, especially given the sensitivity over recent election cock-ups in Scotland.
This is one I don't get. The SNP is a minority government; Iain Gray knows full well they can't get through their local income tax proposals if the parliamentary arithmetic doesn't add up. Labour, or another party, needs to back it too. So is he disappointed it isn't going through, or pleased it isn't going through? If the latter, shouldn't he be saying "hooray"? Not "oh no, the buggers aren't doing what they promised".It does seem remarkable that as soon as the SNP administration in Edinburgh drops yet another major manifesto commitment,
This is why I look on in disconnected disdain for the machinations of the lot of them.
I share your desire to see saintlier politicians, though.
Who wants 'saintly or saintlier' politicians?
Saintlier politicians who oppose the change to a local tax based more on the ability to pay? Some saints!I thought danny did. I certainly do.

I thought danny did. I certainly do.
Saintlier politicians who oppose the change to a local tax based more on the ability to pay? Some saints!![]()

You're probably right.I doubt he wants 'saintlier' anything.
Who wants 'saintly or saintlier' politicians?
But local taxation based on ability to pay would have been good.
Income is more closely related.Homes are more closely related to wealth than almost anything else.
Income is more closely related.
The differential between Fred Goodwin and a full time worker on the national minimum wage is 250 to 1.
The differential between the highest council tax band and the lowest is 3 to 1.
Clearly a far more progressive tax is needed.
It's not something I need to be told to 'face'. I'm well aware of the business class' shenanigans. (They are the real benefits cheats, not the stereotyped 'chav' doing the ironing in the Shop-a-Neighbour TV ads. But will the true situation feature in a TV ad? Not under current social structures). However, I'd rather Fred paid redistributive tax on even his declared earnings than just the top band of council tax.face it, for those workers with a standard job and no other income, income tax is compulsory and unavoidable. That's much less true for anyone on self-assessment and for those with sufficient wealth it's almost entirely voluntary.
What we all need to face is that the current system is designed by the wealthy for the wealthy.
Aye, fair enough.I wasn't trying to be rude, it's just a figure of speech.
I'm not saying taxing income is perfect, just better than the council tax, which does not closely enough track ability to pay.that's right, and that's why finding a diversity of ways to tax them is essential, and that includes revamping property taxes. Simply taxing declared income whilst ignoring underlying wealth is in the interests of the few haves, not in the interests of the many havenots.