roryer
道可道非常道,名可名非常名
Perhaps, but I prefer the following rule of thumb... Cyclists should always be considerate of other road users, particularily pedestrians, and never cycle in such a way as to risk collision with pedestrians particularily when not stopping at a red light.BigPhil said:Generally, cyclists should stop at red lights.
In terms of designing for cyclists, I think the comments from Germany are useful. The pedestrian hatred of cyclists seems confined to countries where the car rules.
I believe the nature of our road system encourages cyclists to ride more agressively, when cycling in Holland I ride much more casually as I am usually enjoying the experience, and not feeling stressed out by the need to negotiate through traffic, I'm quite happy to wait for the green cycle to cross roads as I know I won't wait long, I don't need to force my way to the front of traffic as I'm not forced to cycle in amongst car traffic at all.
Although Amsterdam is an exception as tourists treat the cycle lanes as extention of the pavement, conflicts between pedestrians and cyclists seem rare elsewhere.
There is widescale use of shared space in the Dutch system, with cycle lanes and footways often being shared in rural areas, and this in my experience leads to very few conflicts. In Strasbourg trams, pedestrians and cyclists all share the car free city centre without any problem.
I know we have a long way to go to get proper cycle provision in the UK, but in the meantime, there are justifications for cyclists to ocassionally jump red lights, when this is done with consideration for other road user I simply don't see the problem.
to admit it
which at the back of our minds is true i think that can make us aggressive and like we are on a mission - at the very least it produces lots of adrenaline
