andrewwyld said:Or that he intended to.
indeed ... free will again.
If people were perfect they'd have no choice ... they'd always be programed to do the right thing.
andrewwyld said:Or that he intended to.
mattkidd12 said:If we have free will, god cannot possibly be omniscient.
This is usually argued from the position that a deterministic universe precludes free will. I think a random universe equally precludes free will (or doesn't). Which is more free -- a calculator, or dice? I don't actually think either assumption precludes free will unless we choose definitions of free will which embody logical contradictions, and are therefore impossible under any circumstances. Unfortunately, I think a lot of people unwittingly do.mattkidd12 said:If we have free will, god cannot possibly be omniscient.
I knew you were going to say that.mattkidd12 said:If he knew, we wouldn't have free will though.
mattkidd12 said:If he knew, we wouldn't have free will though.
Well, usually what happens in the stories is either that the extra information enables someone to make a better choice (most modern time-travel stories), or that someone tries to avoid their predicted fate and brings it upon themselves in a terrible twist of irony (delphic oracle stories). One is inconsistent with the coexistence of free will and determinism, and one is not. Choose your pitch, I guess. Personally I think God is independent of spacetime, so the fact that he knows what I am going to do is only because he is already there in the future. Of course, so am I. The future me is, anyway. Assuming I am not dead. He knows what I did, too (except the bits he has forgotten).angry bob said:If someone had a time machine and could see the future would it neccessarily destroy everyone elses ability to make choices?
mattkidd12 said:But if god knew what we were going to do, then we couldn't change it could we?
andrewwyld said:Well, usually what happens in the stories is either that the extra information enables someone to make a better choice (most modern time-travel stories), or that someone tries to avoid their predicted fate and brings it upon themselves in a terrible twist of irony (delphic oracle stories). One is inconsistent with the coexistence of free will and determinism, and one is not. Choose your pitch, I guess. Personally I think God is independent of spacetime, so the fact that he knows what I am going to do is only because he is already there in the future. Of course, so am I. The future me is, anyway. Assuming I am not dead. He knows what I did, too (except the bits he has forgotten).
It used to be more open but he kept getting trolls all the time.angry bob said:My problem with the existence of god is 'why all the secrecy?'
phildwyer said:What we call "good" and "evil" are not self-identical essences, but different aspects of our experience of deity. Satan is God's messenger just as much as Gabriel.
rocketman said:Heh: Try this: "God is Satan, Satan is God".
After all, which deity kills the most people each day, or sees killing performed in its name.
In any case, the notion that God is a moral perfect entity is a little flawed, when you consider that in its origin, the Christian/Muslim/Jewish God is based on the entity called "Yahweh". Yahweh was a vengeful, amoral, desert spirit.
Have fun.
MuHaHaHa
) angry bob said:Don't know where you get that he "was a vengeful, amoral, desert spirit".
Bible stories never seemed this fun when I was small. Almost makes me miss going to church!*Groucho said:...I point this out, not in order to disprove the former existance of God but to demonstrate that God is, or rather was, not infallable. I recall reading the fabulous Sodom and Gamorrah story in the 'Good Book' (actually it really is quite good in places but fairly mediocre in others, also it hasn't aged well.) But the S&G story still stands up rigid in it's own right...