Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Glorify Terrorism Here!

Maggot said:
You forgot this one:

mandela_pic
Darn you maggot I was planning Nelie as after dinner mint. The main course:
180px-Eamondv.jpg
Eamon de Valera who was better at making dead Irishmen than the Tans.
 
Some others who should be Glorified.

strathclyde_page1.jpg


Baird and Hardie Martyrs of the Radical War of 1820: May they revel in our Glory.


nov4_hungary_rev1.gif


Those who Fought Back, Hungary November 1956: May they revel in our Glory.


mw82279.jpg


Sergei "Stepniak" Kravchinski, who killed the head of the Russian Secret Police in 1878. May he revel in our Glory.


And let us not forget, that proponent of Direct Action:

prescott3.jpg
 
pilchardman said:
Terrorism is like alcoholism
There should be supportive meetings for terrorists who want to give up.

<sob> "Hello, my name's ******* and I'm a terrorist." <sob> (Followed by harrowing account of how terrorism has wrecked his/her life.)
 
Are they still proposing to punish people who glorify historical acts of terrorism? If so, could I express my support for the heroic struggle of the Iceni under their tribal leader Queen Boadicea against the oppressive regime of the Romans?
 
Donna Ferentes said:
Are they still proposing to punish people who glorify historical acts of terrorism? If so, could I express my support for the heroic struggle of the Iceni under their tribal leader Queen Boadicea against the oppressive regime of the Romans?
I think the Boadican rebellion is on the approved list. Choose again.
 
Ket's rebellion

I didn't hear it - or the Levellers - mentioned in this connection. Although the Diggers were given the all clear. Being pacifists. (Their downfall).
 
don't be silly,. that was in his earliest youth , he has supported every progressive struggle since and was one of the Shrewsbury two who spent a year inside for TU activities, SB even had a file on him..

National Front twat, more like...
 
More heroic images from the proud republican struggle....

Jean%20McConville.jpg


Where are they now?

c1.jpg


Claudy just after it's liberation from the British jackboot.

bf6.jpg


Oxford St bus station at the vanguard of british colonialism.

eb2.jpg

Come on, they were wearing poppies!

km3.jpg


Obviously the South Armagh Republican Action Force had absolutely no link to the PIRA, and obviously they are Hovis fans.
 
revol68 said:
bfg.gif


Map marking liberated zones...

bf7.jpg


British stooge!

bomb3.jpg


Death to imperialist fish mongers!


Ah how we miss those days so sos much....now why don`t you turn your attention to the hero`s of Ulster loyalism in your home town of Larne who seem to be engaged in a campaign to burn O.A.P. out of their homes in the middle of the night...God their comradres from the UVF and the Ulster rifles who died at the Somme must be proud of their actions.....and all in the name of queen and country....
 
Looking at the redrafted bill we don't have to worry about all the historical incidents any more - though originally we would have had to.

According to the grauniad:

"somebody will only be guilty of glorifying terrorism if it is proved they also intended to incite further acts of terror"

How do you prove 'intention' I wonder? It's always tough to come up with the evidence for a thought crime...
 
Brainaddict said:
According to the grauniad:

"somebody will only be guilty of glorifying terrorism if it is proved they also intended to incite further acts of terror"

How do you prove 'intention' I wonder? It's always tough to come up with the evidence for a thought crime...
There's nothing special about having to prove intent. That's a normal part of criminal law.

I think the interesting thing is that the proposers are now saying that there must be intent to incite terrorism. Incitement to murder (and, indeed, incitement to commit other crimes) is already a crime! So why do we need the new law?
 
JHE said:
There's nothing special about having to prove intent. That's a normal part of criminal law.

I think the interesting thing is that the proposers are now saying that there must be intent to incite terrorism. Incitement to murder (and, indeed, incitement to commit other crimes) is already a crime! So why do we need the new law?
to fuck over people who fall into the rather broad definition of terrorism in the terrorism act 2000.
 
JHE said:
There's nothing special about having to prove intent. That's a normal part of criminal law.

I think the interesting thing is that the proposers are now saying that there must be intent to incite terrorism. Incitement to murder (and, indeed, incitement to commit other crimes) is already a crime! So why do we need the new law?
Because once suspected of anything related to terrorism (as distinct from murder) the person loses all rights and can be locked up without trial. Presumably.
 
i don't want to join the debate. am i allowed to just say that i think terrorism is really cool and i want to be a terrorist when i grow up cos they get cool hats and all the chicks.
 
bluestreak said:
i don't want to join the debate. am i allowed to just say that i think terrorism is really cool and i want to be a terrorist when i grow up cos they get cool hats and all the chicks.
well I don't know if you're allowed to say that. are you intending to incite further terrorism? be honest now
 
Brainaddict said:
well I don't know if you're allowed to say that. are you intending to incite further terrorism? be honest now

no, i just want cool hats and chicks. i'd join anyone for that.
 
cemertyone said:
Ah how we miss those days so sos much....now why don`t you turn your attention to the hero`s of Ulster loyalism in your home town of Larne who seem to be engaged in a campaign to burn O.A.P. out of their homes in the middle of the night...God their comradres from the UVF and the Ulster rifles who died at the Somme must be proud of their actions.....and all in the name of queen and country....

Well if i had been treated to Urban75 posters pasting up images glorifying loyalism then I no doubt would have.

Typical that the only fucking response you can muster is "well the other lot are worse" sums the fucking patheticness of republicanism perfectly for me.It generally works too though, that is until someone asks why the fuck we should ahve to accept any of it, from either the Brits, republicans or loyalists.
 
bluestreak said:
i don't want to join the debate. am i allowed to just say that i think terrorism is really cool and i want to be a terrorist when i grow up cos they get cool hats and all the chicks.

I swear i smell a HAT terrorist in the making here..... :rolleyes:
 
Man, this is like so, so cool! I really really want to be just like these people! Where do I sign up?

Each new recruit was given several days to write out his entire life story by hand, including names and addresses of family members, friends, and lovers, then was required to sign a paper saying he agreed to be executed if anything was found to be untrue. Every so often, the recruit would be asked to rewrite the whole thing; any discrepancies were taken as evidence that he was a spy, probably for Israel or Arafat, and he would be asked to write it out again, often after days being beaten and nights spent forced to sleep standing up.

By 1987, Abu Nidal had turned the full force of his terror tactics inwards on the ANO itself. Members were tortured until they confessed to betrayal and disloyalty. According to recruits who were able to escape, victims were buried alive, fed through a tube forced into their mouths, then finally killed by a bullet fired down the tube. Some had their genitals placed in skillets of boiling-hot oil, (Clarridge 1997).

There were several mass purges. During one night in November 1987, 170 members were tied up, blindfolded, machine-gunned, and buried in a mass grave. Another 160 met the same fate in Libya shortly afterwards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Nidal

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom