"Globalist"

[ViolentPanda]

Bit tasteless fantasising about the deaths of posters, though

He's not fantasising, he's making an explanatory point.

 

[butchersapron]

The anti-globalist crowd really would shoot most of us here if they got the chance, though, camo.

You've been wading in so much filth camo, it's starting to stick to you. If they managed to win the power to govern they'd kill most of the people who post on here, including you.

These are the only posts worth bothering with on this thread.

 

[camouflage]

Ah, a new iteration of "rootless cosmopolitan".

I like the sound of that, can I be one of them? Probably the sort that takes up listening to Jazz mind, can't be arsed with that.

 

[krtek a houby]

He's not fantasising, he's making an explanatory point.

And I'm not going to argue with you, either. You can have your thread back, apologies for interruption.

 

[seventh bullet]

The twisting of my post to mean I am fantasising about the death of camo is a transparent attempt to shoehorn irrelevant past animosity towards me into the topic and divert this thread towards being all about krtek. To reiterate, I am talking about a plausible scenario, with reference to history, of what can/does happen when these people win power. Trump's mouth has got nothing on those who are ideologically committed against people like us, and even him.

 

[ViolentPanda]

I like the sound of that, can I be one of them? Probably the sort that takes up listening to Jazz mind, can't be arsed with that.

Given that it's a synonym for Jew, then only if you've been circumcised and bar-mitzvah'd, bubeleh.

 

[redsquirrel]

The twisting of my post to mean I am fantasising about the death of camo is a transparent attempt to shoehorn irrelevant past animosity towards me into the topic and divert this thread towards being all about krtek. To reiterate, I am talking about a plausible scenario, with reference to history, of what can/does happen when these people win power. Trump's mouth has got nothing on those who are ideologically committed against people like us, and even him.

Bang on.

 

[camouflage]

The twisting of my post to mean I am fantasising about the death of camo is a transparent attempt to shoehorn irrelevant past animosity towards me into the topic and divert this thread towards being all about krtek. To reiterate, I am talking about a plausible scenario, with reference to history, of what can/does happen when these people win power. Trump's mouth has got nothing on those who are ideologically committed against people like us, and even him.

Well we all get misrepresented in the course of discussing stuff sometimes don't we. I actually consider your first point enlightening to an extent, despite the automatic insult you packaged it with. I had not previously appreciated that the meaning of anti-Globalist is markedly different from the meaning of anti-Globalization. Seems counter-intuitive really, but explains the disconnect in sentiment. I'm glad I checked that mismatch, I'm not into the stuff people who use the term Globalist believe in and already consider them dangerous to me and mine.

What would you call the ideological supporters of Globalization as the process of the domination of capital across planet Earth then? (now that we see that Globalist is not the correct answer)

 

[ViolentPanda]

The twisting of my post to mean I am fantasising about the death of camo is a transparent attempt to shoehorn irrelevant past animosity towards me into the topic and divert this thread towards being all about krtek. To reiterate, I am talking about a plausible scenario, with reference to history, of what can/does happen when these people win power. Trump's mouth has got nothing on those who are ideologically committed against people like us, and even him.

Quite. Trump himself is unlikely to reap the whirlwind of surrounding himself with these deeply ideological rightists, and drawing support from them, but there are plenty of people who will reap it by proxy when these fascist manques start exercising the power Trump gives them. The US right have whined for decades about "black helicopters" and FEMA "deathcamps". How ironic that they're now in a position to initiate the very thing they've feared, but on their enemies.

 

[camouflage]

Given that it's a synonym for Jew, then only if you've been circumcised and bar-mitzvah'd, bubeleh.

A bar-mitzvah could probably be arranged, I understand you've got to really want it but it can be arranged. Liking jazz on the other hand is completely out of the question.

 

[DotCommunist]

I file the term in with 'international financiers' and 'rootless cosmopolitans'

 

[seventh bullet]

Well we all get misrepresented in the course of discussing stuff sometimes don't we. I actually consider your first point enlightening to an extent, despite the automatic insult you packaged it with. I had not previously appreciated that the meaning of anti-Globalist is markedly different from the meaning of anti-Globalization. Seems counter-intuitive really, but explains the disconnect in sentiment. I'm glad I checked that mismatch, I'm not into the stuff people who use the term Globalist believe in and already consider them dangerous to me and mine.

What would you call the ideological supporters of Globalization as the process of the domination of capital across planet Earth then? (now that we see that Globalist is not the correct answer)

Who are the real Nazis?

 

[krtek a houby]

The twisting of my post to mean I am fantasising about the death of camo is a transparent attempt to shoehorn irrelevant past animosity towards me into the topic and divert this thread towards being all about krtek. To reiterate, I am talking about a plausible scenario, with reference to history, of what can/does happen when these people win power. Trump's mouth has got nothing on those who are ideologically committed against people like us, and even him.

The irony. Just do a search for "racist" posted under your name & you'll see you shoehorn your beef in wherever possible. I read your post as a violent one, not a factual one. Perhaps I jumped to the wrong conclusion because of your posting history of what can/does happen when we post on the same subject.

I'll leave it there & stop posting on this thread.

 

[camouflage]

I file the term in with 'international financiers' and 'rootless cosmopolitans'

I'd quite like to be an "international financier" too to be fair. Sadly, I don't currently have the funds.

 

[seventh bullet]

The irony. Just do a search for "racist" posted under your name & you'll see you shoehorn your beef in wherever possible. I read your post as a violent one, not a factual one. Perhaps I jumped to the wrong conclusion because of your posting history of what can/does happen when we post on the same subject.

I'll leave it there & stop posting on this thread.

Just go away. Seriously. You're not wanted here.

 

[camouflage]

What about "Bankster", I've een suspicious of "Bankster" for awhile now, even though there's plenty of criticism to be made of the financial system, use of the term "Bankster" has a certain ring to it.

 

[bimble]

I think the thing posted up there in the OP is my fault, i found it googling globalist earlier (in a sea of soroses).
But the readers of Breitbart know what the word means, the most popular comment under Breitbart's article about May today simply called her "another globalist".
As does Trump, who said "we will no longer surrender America or its people to the false song of globalism".
I don't think its as simple as just a new code word for octopus-jew.

 

[Idris2002]

I think the thing posted up there in the OP is my fault, i found it googling globalist earlier (in a sea of soroses).
But the readers of Breitbart know what the word means, the most popular comment under Breitbart's article about May today simply called her "another globalist".
As does Trump, who said "we will no longer surrender America or its people to the false song of globalism".
I don't think its as simple as just a new code word for octopus-jew.

It is a new code word, but it's also more than that. It's both a dog whistle and a calling signal. It retains all the old bullshit, and it can also funnel new recruits to the shirt of brown.

 

[DotCommunist]

gives the shine of 'anti capitalist'. It wouldn't be the first time the language of the left has been hijacked so

 

[camouflage]

I think the thing posted up there in the OP is my fault, i found it googling globalist earlier (in a sea of soroses).
But the readers of Breitbart know what the word means, the most popular comment under Breitbart's article about May today simply called her "another globalist".
As does Trump, who said "we will no longer surrender America or its people to the false song of globalism".
I don't think its as simple as just a new code word for octopus-jew.

I think it's concerning that standard octopus-jew concept has now been gene-spliced with some well established anti-establishment/anti-capitalist notions as well. But then maybe that's always been the case, that Austrian fecalphiliac used to bang on about "the bankers" too didn't he. Poisoned well of anti-capitalism.

 

[camouflage]

gives the shine of 'anti capitalist'. It wouldn't be the first time the language of the left has been hijacked so

precisely. and it's annoying. though it looks like "globalist" was never Left-speak anyway, though it looked as if it were.

from now on I'll be making do with "urgh".

 

[bimble]

gives the shine of 'anti capitalist'. It wouldn't be the first time the language of the left has been hijacked so

Trump the anti-capitalist?

 

[DotCommunist]

Trump the anti-capitalist?

Drain the swamp!

 

[bimble]

Drain the swamp!

thank you. made me laugh, which is much needed.

 

[ViolentPanda]

What would you call the ideological supporters of Globalization as the process of the domination of capital across planet Earth then? (now that we see that Globalist is not the correct answer)

We call them neoliberal capitalists. Globalisation is inherent to their mode of accumulation, just as it has been in most modes of capitalism in the last 250 years. The difference between the modern iteration and the older ones is a difference of speed - exploitation used to be slower, and based on an uneven trade between raw materials and finished goods. Now the exploitation is facilitated and enhanced electronically.

 

[camouflage]

We call them neoliberal capitalists. Globalisation is inherent to their mode of accumulation, just as it has been in most modes of capitalism in the last 250 years. The difference between the modern iteration and the older ones is a difference of speed - exploitation used to be slower, and based on an uneven trade between raw materials and finished goods. Now the exploitation is facilitated and enhanced electronically.

sound.

 

[Shechemite]

Bit tasteless fantasising about the deaths of posters, though

Your response to someone pointing out the outcome of fascism is to point score.

I thought you were against all that 'personal' stuff. And against er fascism.

Eta: ah already dealt with

 

[tim]

Ah, a new iteration of "rootless cosmopolitan".

A type our Glorious Christian Leader is not keen on

But if you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere. You don’t understand what the very word ‘citizenship’ means.

Theresa May's conference speech in full

 

[ViolentPanda]

A type our Glorious Christian Leader is not keen on



Theresa May's conference speech in full

Like her predecessors, she's way too ready to pluck the nationalist banjo string (ooh err!).

 

[hipipol]

Witness the smoking crater where this Leftists use of the term "Globalist" used to be...
I fucking Planned Parenthood, corrupting our precious bodily fluids!)
Godamnit Cartman.