chegrimandi
associated with adultery
if the message you are raising awareness of is contradictory, ie lets end poverty while we indulge in every excess possible what the fuck does that say to people? Its a wrong mixed message innit.... 


J77 said:120 quid's nothing to have a quality weekend.

J77 said:People don't piss in hedges anymore...
I think I once saw the disposible heroes of hiphoprisy there once - that was good![]()
chegrimandi said:if the message you are raising awareness of is contradictory, ie lets end poverty while we indulge in every excess possible what the fuck does that say to people? Its a wrong mixed message innit....![]()
Well, not necessarily. As some people have said already, not everyone indulges in excess. And again, I think the amount of money they raised is probably a more important consideration than just "mixed messages".chegrimandi said:if the message you are raising awareness of is contradictory, ie lets end poverty while we indulge in every excess possible what the fuck does that say to people? Its a wrong mixed message innit....![]()

My nephew, who is at college, worked hard in the evenings in a local restaurant to save money for his Glastonbury ticket and money to spend when he got there.chegrimandi said:.............with a festival that basically makes it possible for thousands of essentially rich people to go into a field in the countryside and gourge and consume as many drugs,![]()
Agent Sparrow said:Well, not necessarily. As some people have said already, not everyone indulges in excess. And again, I think the amount of money they raised is probably a more important consideration than just "mixed messages".
Look, the thing is that everyone with a good standard of living apart from possible an extreme moral minority is going to spend money on whatever excesses they're in to (whether this is electrical equipment, drugs, music, clothes etc.) but it doesn't mean that some of these people can't also care about what goes on in the world, to differing extents. And its pretty unlikely that everyone is ever going to care so much that they'll donate all their money to such causes rather than their own excesses, at least in this day and age, so whats wrong with trying to make more people care at least a little bit?
Isn't anything better than nothing in this context?
Stobart Stopper said:My nephew, who is at college, worked hard in the evenings in a local restaurant to save money for his Glastonbury ticket and money to spend when he got there.
chegrimandi said:Its all about the message being too tame, too empty and not radical enough.
I still hold that a million is better than than nothing, and the families that million help I imagine agree.chegrimandi said:I'm sorry - not everyone indulges in excess - boll-ocks. Utter. The amount of money raised will be entirely insignificant. Its going to take billions, not the odd million. The message is all important because if people go away thinking I've done my bit whats really going to change. Sweet f.a.
But... you could say the majority of people are tame and not radical.Its all about the message being too tame, too empty and not radical enough.
Agent Sparrow said:I still hold that a million is better than than nothing, and the families that million help I imagine agree.
Is there any evidence to suggest in this case that thats been done? That the majority of people why did go home thinking "well, I've done my bit so I don't need to do anymore" would have otherwise donated? Because I don't reckon they would have done. But I guess its going to be very difficult to assert that either way.chegrimandi said:what if the way the million raised totally undermines what you are attempting to achieve? The long-term damage?
1) a lot of young people are hedoniststreelover said:Good op Cheg, at last the dam breaks, the orgy of hedonism that is Glasto is exposed, i,m not against festivals, Shambala is a great one but Glastonbury has lost its way.
We're all hypocrites one way or another, but to suggest that Glastonbury is nothing but "an orgy of western excess" is plain wrong.chegrimandi said:please ed' you are having a laugh aren't you.....do you think its not even a teensy bit hypocritical?
It's Pickman's "The Tabloid" Model!Pickman's model said:...i'd be astonished if they hadn't tried to fleece the drug-crazed hippies, and others, who attend glastonbury..



that to me shows tangible results.I'd like to say again that I don't necessarily disagree entirely with what you (or cheg) are saying, but I still hold that there are a hell of a lot of people who were there who would have contributed nothing if not for the price of their ticket. Surely if it gets someone to contribute for whatever reason, or at least think about the issue for a minute, its better than nothing at all (which is what a hell of a lot of people contribute).bristle-krs said:regardless of any well-meaning 'initiatives' paid for through glasto, or any on-site 'greenness', it feels like it's a case of 'salve your conscience by being there and knowing some of the cash goes to a good cause' - a weekend-long island of consciousness in the year-long polluted ocean of over-consumption, cultural imperialism and economic enslavement which is (for most of us in the global north, by implicit involvement) our life.
why?editor said:It's Pickman's "The Tabloid" Model!
To be honest, I reckon most people were there for the beer, the bands, or whatever, but there is an element of Glasto that might open up da kiDz minds a bit.bristle-krs said:i didn't go, but i still have an opinion![]()
yes, i think cheg has a good point. it's similar to the criticisms of the live8 stuff - that it's not enough to "raise the issue".
the contrast between a festival of fun (a 'good thing', don't get me wrong) and its attendant excesses, and poverty in its entire malnourished, overworked, underpaid glory is stark.
make poverty money?editor said:
bristle-krs said:i didn't go, but i still have an opinion![]()
yes, i think cheg has a good point. it's similar to the criticisms of the live8 stuff - that it's not enough to "raise the issue".
the contrast between a festival of fun (a 'good thing', don't get me wrong) and its attendant excesses, and poverty in its entire malnourished, overworked, underpaid glory is stark.
regardless of any well-meaning 'initiatives' paid for through glasto, or any on-site 'greenness', it feels like it's a case of 'salve your conscience by being there and knowing some of the cash goes to a good cause' - a weekend-long island of consciousness in the year-long polluted ocean of over-consumption, cultural imperialism and economic enslavement which is (for most of us in the global north, by implicit involvement) our life.
now, that's not to say we like it like that; but individual lifestyle choices do not the world change
discuss
btw i fully support mr eavis's involvement in contributing to the rural housing trust, which is helping local people in pilton rent properly affordable (ie if out of work, housing benefit would cover 100% of the rent), decent homes in pilton, meaning that it has a fighting chance of remaining a working village and not another dormitory for second-homing yuppiesthat to me shows tangible results.
the rht does this all over england - see the 'village homes for village people' thread for more...
carry on!
) as wellYou've never set foot in the place so you won't know how laughable your emphasis on "drug crazed hippies" is.Pickman's model said:are you denying that there are druggie hippies at glastonbury?