teuchter
je suis teuchter
I lived there for a number of years, that why I asked you to explain what you were on about.
There were only ever a handful of crossing points between the old and new towns because prior to the existence of the railway, the Nor'Loch occupied most of that area. Plus, before the new town was built there were some villages and Leith on the north side, and the crossing points represent roughly where road access to these places always was. In the case of North Bridge it is now somewhat elevated as the station occupies part of where the route to Leith was (iirc).
I know.
You seem to be advocating that if the railway wasn't there, prince's street gardens should be built upon,
No I'm not.
yet also arguing that railways shouldn't intrude into the centre of a town or city.
No I'm not.
Railways are part of a city, trying to bury them away because they offend your sensibilities in some way (aesthetically? Audibly?) is frankly a bit bizarre considering fuck all can be done about it in this day and age.
They don't offend my sensibilities and I don't want to bury them away.
ESPECIALLY ON A THREAD ABOUT THE GLASGOW SCHOOL OF ART FIRE - FUCK OFF TO THE TRANSPORT FORUM AND ARGUE ABOUT WHY YOU HATE TRAINS THERE FFS.
You started this bizarre argument and it looks like you want to argue about a load of stuff I've not even said. You seem determined to willfully misunderstand everything I write. Initially I just made the straightforward point that Edinburgh is unusual in the fact that the railway passes through the very centre of town at surface level. Get a grip.
