GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
18 hours...
Giving back Gaza: was it a big mistake?
- Thread starter Johnny Canuck3
- Start date
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
GarfieldLeChat said:
So he'll probably avoid posting on this thread (if his ego lets him) for about 20 hrs, and then pretend as how he hasn't seen your post.
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
we'll see...ViolentPanda said:So he'll probably avoid posting on this thread (if his ego lets him) for about 20 hrs, and then pretend as how he hasn't seen your post.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
GarfieldLeChat said:
I certainly hope so.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Did mears say he offers "solutions"? That's the first I've heard of it. He tends to tell us all how wrong we are to criticise US foreign policy; and then tells us that we are "obsessed with America (sic) and Israel". Not what I would call offering solutions. It's more of the same from Ayn Rand's wankstain.
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
no you'll retract it , provide evidence that I am not providing solutions or face the (legal) consequences...mears said:I will retract when you offer some solutions.
In the meantime, fuck you
BTW I would have thought that using a high profile bulletin board to make slanderous accusations would be frowned upon by the FAQ and the mod team too ...
6 hours 30 minutes...
Random
Ethnic nalgocrat
Johnny Canuck2 said:
Gaza has been 'given' to the corrupt PA to run as a huge ghetto. This hasn't worked wonders for peace but it has, probably strengthened the IDF's ability to contain the 1 million people of Gaza. That's why it was done, not as part of some 'peace plan', excpet for a peace-through-firepower plan.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Well, mears? For one so sanctimonious and so supercilious, you don't half look like the weasling, lying fool that you are.
GarfieldLeChat said:
Thats rich coming from the guy who called me a racist, the most slanderous comment on this thread
Its a shame you have to hind behind nonsense and not face the fire head on. Arabs treat Palestinians like dirts and you can't even comment on it. I guess Palestinian suffering only matters when its at the hands of jews.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
mears said:Thats rich coming from the guy who called me a racist, the most slanderous comment on this thread
Its a shame you have to hind behind nonsense and not face the fire head on. Arabs treat Palestinians like dirts and you can't even comment on it. I guess Palestinian suffering only matters when its at the hands of jews.
Well you are a racist, mears. Sorry to be the one to break this to you.
Palestinians are Arabs in case it had escaped your rather blinkered attention.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Fez909 said:
You are totally ingoring the fact that the occupation of Gaza was after a war of agression against Israel. Israel regarded it, rightly as it seems, as a buffer zone against attack.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
moono said:
The sources said that Abu Rob, and three Jihad operatives arrested with him, planned to carry out a suicide attack in Israel to coincide with Palestinian elections. They were armed with assault rifles at the time of their arrest.
Says it all really.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
GarfieldLeChat said:
The above post reads like a cut and paste from the Hamas election manifesto.
FruitandNut
New Member
May the 'Seven Plagues of Egypt' visit both their houses. Both sides (Isreali and Palestinian) have much to blame for the present situation. Uncle Sam hasn't exactly helped either.
Let the side without sin cast the first stone - oops, perhaps enough stones have already been thrown!
Let the side without sin cast the first stone - oops, perhaps enough stones have already been thrown!
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
mears said:
That's the second time you've said that. I agree with you. But it's not only the people around here that can't accept it, though.
Careful, you might get transferred into the tree-huggers category
spring-peeper said:That's the second time you've said that. I agree with you. But it's not only the people around here that can't accept it, though.
Careful, you might get transferred into the tree-huggers category
You are right
You know, the election win by Hamas might turn out very good for the region. Hamas seems to have credibility on the Palestinian street. But now they will run the show. They will have to make decisions. Talk to Israel, recognize Israel, institute more conservative laws, put in political appointes in key departments or ideological sympathizers?
Its much easier to complain than construct policy and Hamas will soon find this out.
Like Arial Sharon, their credibility among hard liners might make an agreement with Israel easier. Sharon could give up Gaza, but could a dove? Could anyone in Palestine save Hamas reach compromise on the West Bank?
Nixon could open up China because of his anti communist credentials for instance. It might take an orginization like Hamas with street credibility to make a lasting agreement with Israel.
This would take some time however.
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
mears said:You are right
You know, the election win by Hamas might turn out very good for the region. Hamas seems to have credibility on the Palestinian street. But now they will run the show. They will have to make decisions. Talk to Israel, recognize Israel, institute more conservative laws, put in political appointes in key departments or ideological sympathizers?
Its much easier to complain than construct policy and Hamas will soon find this out.
Like Arial Sharon, their credibility among hard liners might make an agreement with Israel easier. Sharon could give up Gaza, but could a dove? Could anyone in Palestine save Hamas reach compromise on the West Bank?
Nixon could open up China because of his anti communist credentials for instance. It might take an orginization like Hamas with street credibility to make a lasting agreement with Israel.
This would take some time however.
I was really happy to see the outcome of the election. Shows that people are basically the same everywhere. The common person with kids, trying to hold down a job, and have an nice life got a chance to throw the corrupt lying-scum out of office.
Aside from having to deal with the whole international scene, they are going to have to start trying to fufil their campaign promise of improving the living conditions for their citizens. They are about to find out what ever group that ousts (sp?) the current ruling party - it's easier to criticize than be the party in power.
I wish them luck.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
I think they'll become the next Fatah. Start out as radical terrorists, then rule for a few years and end up as corrupt fat cats.
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
Johnny Canuck2 said:
That's the cycle - same everywhere.
It's what they do with their time in power that counts, though.
edit: substitute "radical terrorist" for "idealist"
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
mears said:
Say it like you mean it....no one whe has read your posts over the years will believe the shite that you've written here.
Your view of this is typically one-dimensional. You are a liar and a cheat.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Joe said:
Depends whether you can prove that a person has actually lied (as opposed to made an error).
If it is provable it's "fair comment".
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Joe said:
Nice try, Joe...are you and mears friends? How many of mears' post have you actually read?
Before you go around pronouncing sentence on others, you would do well to conduct some research before jumping in with both feet.
Just a bit of advice, like.
Similar threads
