Edit removedI like the sound of this
Shit. You're right.yield That's a loon site.

Police Union voting to strike? Can someone translate?
Un syndicat de police dépose un préavis de grève illimitée à partir de ce samedi

What's the betting this will end with bullets, and not the rubber kind either?
What's the betting this will end with bullets, and not the rubber kind either?

- i.e Germany. The EU can put the squeeze on the likes of greece and ireland - because they needed bailouts - but France is a much more powerful entity
. But in terms of here and now and what can be done it really is a no-brainer.I wonder how Le Pen is fairing in opinion polls at the mo. European Elections in May....
I expect the overall mood and direction is as mixed as the population at large
One thing seems clear. 1968 it ain't.![]()
So much of it is things I would definitely agree with. But I cannot shake myself out of a worry that something is dodgy here and the right wing will soon be stronger.
"noone should pay more than 25% of their income in tax" is their bread and butter, after all
Don't forget France had wealth taxes. There could be a taxation model aimed at taxing unproductive assets i.e. land / gold rather than income which arguably would encourage productive investments. If people don't register their assets for taxation purposes they lose title to them (i.e. don't own them).
1. Quick thoughts on what's happening in France, after I've been out this morning watching gilets jaunes in Paris. Purchasing power has long been a bigger problem in France than in other western countries/
2. Lots of people are on the national minimum wage (about 14,900 euros a year) and many more cluster around the median wage of about 22,000 gross, with charges to pay. So the French have their health, education and pensions mostly taken care of but have little disposable income
3. Coupled with this is huge personal dislike of Macron - more of the man than of his policies. (He was able to do the labour-market reforms that no president had dared for 20 years with fairly little opposition)
4. And this relatively poor country has a capital city that has been dripping with wealth for centuries - so the shops in Paris are a provocative sight to most French people. So is the de facto royal court of elite Parisians that assembles around every French president
5. BUT let's not exaggerate the level of turmoil in France. Two weeks ago, there were more people at the (barely reported) women's march in Paris than the 8,000 gilets jaunes who demonstrated the same day
6. The international attention took off after the violence on the Champs-Elysees last week. Spectacular images of fires, fights, tear gas. But that was done by a minority of 'casseurs' (literally: 'breakers'), violent anarchists who are part of the French tradition
7. There's some overlap between the casseurs and gilets jaunes but latter group is much larger. Yet the violence suggested a country in revolution - which France is not (e.g. my son just went off with his mates through the peaceful city to his football match in the suburbs)
8. Most French people say in surveys that they support the 'gilets jaunes'. But what does it mean to 'support' an amorphous movement with no clear goals beyond wanting more purchasing power and disliking Macron? This sounds like a general expression of discontent
9. Conclusion: big, long-lasting problem of purchasing power, personal dislike of Macron, persistent French discontent for over a decade now. But last weekend's images of violence (which play beautifully on TV) exaggerate the level of disorder in France. No revolution
10. No revolution: 8,000 gilets jaunes demonstrators in Paris today, according to government. Also 8,000 police officers (via @stefandevries)
And of course assigning them to the "left" or "right" ignores the fact that the politics of people are modified/affected by events.To write of the protests as right wing or to wish them to be left wing doesnt do anyone any favours .Neither does trying to judge movements by how perfect/imperfect their programme is.
It's worth remembering that France has a high tax take, but that it has a high proportion of indirect taxation too. The burden of indirect taxation disproportionately falls on the poorest. The tax structure in France is widely seen as favouring the rich, especially after the recent tax changes. So it's too simple to write this off as a right wing call. It's a call of people on low incomes, irate with the political classes. It's not an ideologue right or left movement. Indeed, the claims of various groups to speak for the movement have been quickly shown not to be true."noone should pay more than 25% of their income in tax" is their bread and butter, after all
In summary, the jpeg is being jumped on because everyone wants an immediate answer to what the movement represents. which is in itself stupid - the movement is (especially now) beyond categorisation, and regardless, whatever it is, its shifting fast. remember a week ago everyone was happy labelling it as an anti-diesel tax rise protest (or anti climate change mitigation protest for those with an axe to grind). if its anything, its simply popular protests for better spending power. you don't vacate that territory.