Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Getting Run Over in Brixton

Donna Ferentes said:
Because we were discussing how, in general, incidents such as this might best be handled.
and that would include fitting some one up on flase charges would it...

or would it be as hendo appears to have done point out the error get some sort of admission of error from the person (and some random slagging by some nutter on a bike) and then say well that was a narrow escape, and chalk it down to experince... with a funny tale to tell...

I know which is the better option for me ....
 
Donna Ferentes said:
Do you find this has adverse consquences for you?


not often tbh i mean if i'm with a pensioner i might modify my language a bit cos they don't really like it and you can't go round upsetting grannies but in normal life every day no it's all part of self expression isn't it... i mean i have never really subscribed to the swearing means limited vocabulary it's pusillanimous rubbish ... tbh
 
I just wondered whether, if you accuse people, in real life, of being impotent individuals worried about their small penises, it might lead to the sort of confrontation that one normally associates with deliberately denting the bonnets of people's cars.
 
Donna Ferentes said:
I just wondered whether, if you accuse people, in real life, of being impotent individuals worried about their small penises, it might lead to the sort of confrontation that one normally associates with deliberately denting the bonnets of people's cars.

not really if one is having a conversation of the likes of the above with the editor then there's a different tone (one would hope) to that of a situation where some one was nearly run over... though if the intial reaction was one of an agressive stand point are you suggesting that the action of point out the game someone is playing whilst beating their cheast is the break point... i'd suggest that the break point would be the intial unconnected reaction of aggression which then prompted the comment was the break point... but if you will put the cart before the horse then your logic follows yes....
 
comstock said:
How well signed are the banned turns. Not trying to defend anyone here, but if it has happened regularly, does the road layout need looking at?

They're quite well signed. The problem is, some people don't give a shit.
 
fanta said:
I imagine that they're utterly devastated when they learn that.

Hmm... no, I imagine they're more devastated when they feel our wonderful Mayor's hatred of them.
 
fanta said:
Well, no you weren't. You were suggesting he feign injury and damage the car's bonnet. Weren't you? Or was it a joke?
Has hendo got a time machine so that he can go back and do what I suggested, then?

Or should he set up camp by the crossing and wait for the reckless driver to come back ?
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
and this is me spoiling for a fight ... whose the one suggesting that they fuck some one else over in a disproptionat reaction to an action again... oh that'll be you... don't mug me up with your standards... they are far to tight round the arse for me ...
Sorry. No idea what you're blathering on about here.
 
editor said:
Has hendo got a time machine so that he can go back and do what I suggested, then?

Or should he set up camp by the crossing and wait for the reckless driver to come back ?

I suspect not, to both.

But you were saying he should have feigned injury and damage the car's bonnet:

editor said:
You should have pretended that he hit you and writhed around on his bonnet, denting at will.

No?
 
editor said:
Has hendo got a time machine so that he can go back and do what I suggested, then?

Or should he set up camp by the crossing and wait for the reckless driver to come back ?
you were putting this forward as action to bearing mind for next time then?

you think that this type of lord why don't you rid my of this troublesome priest type cry means you can later wash your hands of it...
 
fanta said:
But you were saying he should have feigned injury and damage the car's bonnet:
It was a suggestion.

However, I don't believe I have any powers to compel hendo to follow any of my post-event suggestions, notwithstanding the extreme improbability of the exact circumstances ever arising again.

So what is your point here?
 
Donna Ferentes said:
This does strike me as falling some way short of a Socratic dialogue.

LOL! :D :D

Look the point is, oh fuck it what IS the point?

You never think, or at least, I never think, of all the smart things to do in this situation. You're lucky if you're not in shock, you're angry and you're utterly shaken.

You react; and heaven help you as you do so.
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
you think that this type of lord why don't you rid my of this troublesome priest type cry means you can later wash your hands of it...
Can't you write all this weird stuff in a diary instead?
 
well my point was to question why you think some one should act in a dishonest manner and in doing so fuck some one over for something which might have happened ... it jsut seems like and extreme reaction ... can't speak for fanta...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
well my point was to question why you think some one should act in a dishonest manner and in doing so fuck some one over for something which might have happened ..
Possibly to teach the reckless, dangerous twat a lesson?

Possibly to teach him that his law breaking activites could lead to serious and injury and death to others?

Just a thought, like. Nothing more.
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
can't you learn a bit of history
Can't you learn to express yourself in a coherent, understandable manner and keep your ever-rambling, ever-wandering, often incomprehensible chain of thought on topic and focussed?
 
editor said:
It was a suggestion.

However, I don't believe I have any powers to compel hendo to follow any of my post-event suggestions, notwithstanding the extreme improbability of the exact circumstances ever arising again.

So what is your point here?

That it indeed was a suggestion - to break the law - as you now concede.

You naughty, naughty man. I trust you're thoroughly ashamed of this and we'll soon read a sticky thread in which you retract your 'suggestion' and humbly apologise and ask our forgiveness*














*which I have to warn you may not be necessarily forthcoming given the gravity of your horrid crime.
 
fanta said:
That it indeed was a suggestion - to break the law - as you now concede.
Unless hendo has a time machine, your comments remain utter nonsense.

I offered a suggestion as to what he could have done at the time, not in the future.

Christ, this is tedious.
 
Donna Ferentes said:
I just wondered whether, if you accuse people, in real life, of being impotent individuals worried about their small penises, it might lead to the sort of confrontation that one normally associates with deliberately denting the bonnets of people's cars.

I bet you sport a right handsome whopper, hey Donna? ;)
 
editor said:
Can't you learn to express yourself in a coherent, understandable manner and keep your ever-rambling, ever-wandering, often incomprehensible chain of thought on topic and focussed?
jeusus sorry didn't realise they had found a fucking cure for dyspraxia yet ... :mad: do you fucking take the piss out of people in wheel chairs by saying why can't you just get up and stroll around ...

btw it was on topic your suggestion was that some one act in a manner which is not only illigal (which tbh i couldn't care two fucks about) but also in a cunty aggressive manner... to teach some one a lesson, surely the best lesson has already been taught in very nearly runnign someone over !!!! or is that next best to running over???? with out some pious person coming along and say well i think they need to be taught a lesson... who are you in the sceme of things to teach anyone anything... it's a bit pf a pompous statement... no?

for a start and no discredit to hendo but there is only one side of the story here and yet you have jumped to the conclusion it's definitive...
 
editor said:
Unless hendo has a time machine, your comments remain utter nonsense.

I offered a suggestion as to what he could have done at the time, not in the future.

Christ, this is tedious.

I just thought it was just a bit of banter.

But fuck this, and your bad temper.

Real life beckons, I'm sure there is some paint that needs observing while it drys.
 
tbh i honest i find it tedious that you editor contiuall abuse a dysabled member of these forums by riducling there abilty to express themselves when you know damn well as is evidenced byt he archived thread ont he topic that this is one of the key fucking points of the disablity...

on top of which it's then my fucking attidue problem that you go disabled bashing a fucking gain not your inablity to approprately deal with that disabled person...

your prejudice, your problem of interpreatation, your perception, you deal with it...

I am expecting an apology... and not you wriggling out of it yet a fucking agian this time...
 
Please use a spell checker Garf. Cut and paste a spellchecked document from a Word doc/email if you have to.

I don't have a problem with your dyspraxia, but it is difficult to understand your rants a lot of the time. I know it's a pain in the arse, but it's tough to keep up with your train of thought when it's slapped down so thick and fast. And please let's not get into the disabled-bashing nonsense - I've said exactly the same thing to you before without you playing that card so heavily.
 
hendo said:
You never think, or at least, I never think, of all the smart things to do in this situation. You're lucky if you're not in shock, you're angry and you're utterly shaken.
Well, you don't the first time. I got beaten up in a road rage incident in April and had time to think about it: when something similar (in some ways) happened some time later, I was a little more prepared.
 
Back
Top Bottom