oisleep said:very admirable, was that what the people of BG&B elected him to do though?
and even if they did, those who didn't vote for him are still entitled to expect representation by him are they not?
oisleep said:so his work on this single issue makes up for his pisspoor record in terms of actually being responsive to the real, day to day needs and concerns of his constituents on the ground?
take the fire engine that got removed from bethnal green a few months back, after his brief involvement to get the photo opportunities he needed, the fire engine was removed and despite him saying that the provision of adequate fire safety services to the people of BB&G was central to his election campaing, he's done fuck all since the removal to follow that assertion up, if he now thinks that the people of BG&B do have adequate provision for fire safety, why did he make such a big fuss about the removal in the first place?
oisleep said:take the fire engine that got removed from bethnal green a few months back, after his brief involvement to get the photo opportunities he needed, the fire engine was removed and despite him saying that the provision of adequate fire safety services to the people of BB&G was central to his election campaing, he's done fuck all since the removal to follow that assertion up, if he now thinks that the people of BG&B do have adequate provision for fire safety, why did he make such a big fuss about the removal in the first place?
Pilgrim said:I wouldn't trust that man as far as I could spit.
MC5 said:Make sure you take a legal observer along and have a bustcard with you when you do that, as you could get arrested for it.
MC5 said:Oisleep, you clearly have an axe to grind with regards to Galloway, rather than being really concerned about the day to day needs of his constituents. I too have issues with Respect and George Galloway, however a quick visit to the Respect website and I noticed a number of items around housing and privatisation, the bombings in London, the police, trade union rights and hospital closures. All issues affecting constituents in the East End and beyond.
Nigel Irritable said:I wonder what Oona King is up to these days?
flimsier said:I can't believe people are criticising an MP for working on something when most other MPs are on holiday.
<goes to look for threads criticising the 600-odd other MPs>
Pilgrim said:Ha ha. Very funny.
I think you'll find police cells and a spell in the clink aren't much of a laugh either, not that the SWP CC, and especially John Rees (who was exhorting people to commit arrestable actions), are ever likely to find out for themselves.
They'd be much happier if they could persuade or bully some rank and file members to enjoy that very special experience, in their place, wouldn't they?
oisleep said:would that same quick glance find any information about how a constituent could attend their mp's surgery? the party's only mp
so constituents of BG&B have to put up with plodding through the national website of their elected mp's party as a poor surrogate for any actual action/work on their behalf by said mp?
butchersapron said:What jobs have any of the CC done? Anyone know?
That's one answerPilgrim said:In terms of direct action, non-violent or otherwise, as far as I know, (although I could be wrong and I'll acknowledge it if I am):
NONE.

oisleep said:so where there does it inform about the time and place where he holds his regularly weekly surgery?
in fact where in the whole site does it mention the word surgery (or socialism whilst were at it, apart from the banner)
oisleep said:yeah sorry, i misread your reply, i thought you meant those details were on the page you linked to, soz

MC5 said:I know that a police cell and a spell in the clink is no laughing matter thanks. I don't know who, if any of the present SWP CC, or John Rees has spent time in one. I'm not that interested to be frank.
As far as I'm aware, the SWP, like other parties, is a voluntary organisation and it's down to individuals themselves as to whether they want to be a member, or invole themselves in 'direct action'. Me personally? I'm not going to be persuaded, or bullied (it can't be both btw) into some futile gesture.
oisleep said:in fact where in the whole site does it mention the word surgery
RUC said:George Galloway’s surgery is weekly on Fridays from 4pm to 7pm at 49 Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane. The phone number for appointments is 020 7219 6940
laptop said:But it used to, and Google has preserved a fragment:
Now... to work out which of 1001 things to ask...
oisleep said:search results on the respect website
729 Galloway
439 Islam/Muslim
54 Socialism
Pilgrim said:I'm interested because Rees has been saying that RESPECT councillors should be prepared to go to prison if necessary, and I'm deeply sceptical as to his (or any other SWP CC member's) willingness to lead by example and take that risk themselves. If not, then they have no right whatsoever to exhort anybody else to do so.
My interest comes from several years experience of direct action camps, and having seen the effect that police cells and jail can have on even the most committed activists. It also comes from a genuine concern for the welfare of rank and file Swappies, whom I wouldn't trust the SWP CC (or Galloway, for that matter) not to sacrifice if they considered it a good move.
And, having discussed the Bethnal Green fire station debacle on here, and compared it with direct action as practiced by sorted crews who know what they are doing, I wouldn't trust the SWP CC to organise adirectaction campaign properly and effectively even if their motives were pure. Personally, I don't think they are.