internetstalker
Get naked!
Of course and it was another example of dangerous killer cycles.
yes but the aesthetics make up for the danger!
Of course and it was another example of dangerous killer cycles.
For the record, this is the road in question.
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&h...02439,151.21478&spn=0.002769,0.00405&t=k&z=18
well you asked them first in an attempt to back up your argument. Somehow, I very much doubt they do.
how "dangerous"? the only way to know is how many deaths/serious injuries came from it. without the figures you're making meaningless statements.
I don't think yours are the key questions at all. It is interesting why the pro cycling on the pavement mob have refused to address the simple point that given racing on the public highway is a very dangerous activity and a serious offence, why should cyclists be above the law?

yes but the aesthetics make up for the danger!
if you're going to cite something, you should at least provide a definition.why am I not surprised.
The car and the cyclists were on the same road. If the conditions were unsafe for one they were unsafe for all.
if you're going to cite something, you should at least provide a definition.
I can't find one, so perhaps you should.
Plus cyclists are po faced lentil eaters who have no sense of humour whilst riding their killer machines.

they're only unsafe if you drive unsafely!
although I would certainly never go out on a road bike if there was black ice about, the car shouldof been driving slower
Plus cyclists are po faced lentil eaters who have no sense of humour whilst riding their killer machines.
I like the multicoloured roofsI forgot how not close together and smooth or roads are. I can understand why the driver got impatient, but their is no excuse for his spiteful recklessness.

Ilogical nonsense. if there is black ice about you should not take to the road.
I agree. Whats your opinion on racing on the public highway?
ISWYM
but either way the accident is the cars fault in both this case and the OP.
hence why it's cars that make it dangerous for cyclists!
FFS Cars make it dangerous for other cars
There is no definition of racing in the RTA in either 1988 or 1991 that i can find.Try the Road Traffic Act, it spells out exactly what the law is.
There is no definition of racing in the RTA in either 1988 or 1991 that i can find.
The essential point here is that riding too closely to the vehicle in front gives no room for recovery if something goes wrong.
The essential point here is that riding too closely to the vehicle in front gives no room for recovery if something goes wrong. Couple that with skinny tyres, no protective clothing worth shit and the high speeds that trained cyclists can reach and it's a recipe for blood, bone, and death.
Try the Road Traffic Act, it spells out exactly what the law is.
get a copy of the highway code and look in that. It's the bible.
I have done, it's not in there.get a copy of the highway code and look in that. It's the bible.
If it's that easy to find, you'd have thought Tc would have posted it by now.I detect: we have some moving of goalposts
You don't think racing on the public highway is dangerous?
It sounds like there should indeed be motor cycle outriders at front and back with large flappy things to warn of racing cyclists' approach. I have to go in now and do some work.![]()
you've gotta love the aussies.