TopCat
Putin fanboy
cycling is dangerous is it?
good lordhyperbole, much?
How many are killed every year on cycles? How many cyclists run over pedestriasns?
cycling is dangerous is it?
good lordhyperbole, much?
now you're being rediculous!
Yes the LTDA are more sane.

Can I suggest then that we simply enforce the law towards cyclists as we do to other road users IE no racing on the public highway?
I can't see how paying road tax relates at all to safety. I do think that a pack or peloaton of cyclists really need an outrider on a motorbike at the very least to keep them and other road users safe. If it is a really important sporting event they are training for, well perhaps close some roads for them to race around?
I can't really see how you can advocate the ignoring of very basic principles of the Highway Code simply because you like cyclists or argue they are training for an event.
Cyclists hardly do themselves any favours with regard to safety. Some shun back brakes just to save a coupld of ounces in weight. Others buy the skiniest tyres to save energy and then wonder why they crash in the wet so much, most jump red lights, all ride at some point on the pavement, and, AND, yesterday a pretty cyclist had the audacity to go past me wearing see through leggings, there was nearly a terrible pile up.![]()

What's your definition of "racing" then?
Mostly British cyclists in a group will ride two abreast to make it easier for car drivers to overtake the pack. Are they "racing"?
I think you had a point here....However
As for car drivers they are all angels and never drive dangerously do they????![]()
erm... it said 60 kph. I doubt that's over the speed limit for a dual carriageway. And you're not supposed to overtake unless you've room to get a safe distance from the people you're overtaking...it's very simple if you stick to the speed limits or go slower then you won't have accidents.
What is the legal definition? i don't know what it is.
erm... it said 60 kph. I doubt that's over the speed limit for a dual carriageway. And you're not supposed to overtake unless you've room to get a safe distance from the people you're overtaking...
How many are killed every year on cycles? How many cyclists run over pedestriasns?
it's a straw car argument.
Cyclists hardly do themselves any favours with regard to safety. Some shun back brakes just to save a coupld of ounces in weight. Others buy the skiniest tyres to save energy and then wonder why they crash in the wet so much, most jump red lights, all ride at some point on the pavement, and, AND, yesterday a pretty cyclist had the audacity to go past me wearing see through leggings, there was nearly a terrible pile up.![]()
http://www.ozroads.com.au/NSW/Freeways/M1/m1.htm
This is what Aussie 'motorways' look like. IME, when there is a group of cyclists riding like the group mown down in the article it is very difficult to pass as they jut out into the road and go very fast and can be quite intimidating.
I'm not slagging cyclists by this, just giving a bit of info.
And as for the cyclist with see through leggins. This is something that should be embraced!
I don't think yours are the key questions at all. It is interesting why the pro cycling on the pavement mob have refused to address the simple point that given racing on the public highway is a very dangerous activity and a serious offence, why should cyclists be above the law?
It caused a massive jam, with me riding just behind.
it's the car drivers that make cycling on a public highway dangerous!!
I bet you let her pass you! so you could see her behind
You should not overtake unless it is safe to do so. This applies to the cyclists as well as all other road users.
I don't think swerving in front of someone then slamming on the brakes counts as 'overtaking safely'
Well not always, last year or therabouts a car skidded on black ice and crashed into a clump of club cyclists casing death and injury, i would argue that riding in a pack makes the problem of injuries much worse when they do occor.
This, I think, is the key question. Anyone have figures on this? The figures that will allow real comparison is:
How many cyclists are killed by motorists each year?
How many pedestrians are killed by motorists each year?
How many motorists are killed by cyclists each year?
How many pedestrians are killed by cyclists each year?
If the numbers killed by motorists and the numbers killed by cyclists each year are indeed similar, as you seem to suggest, then you are making a profound and important point. Otherwise, you're talking bollocks![]()
And it's the numbers that are important - not 'well i know a pedestrian who was once run down by an insane cyclist'.
I don't think yours are the key questions at all. It is interesting why the pro cycling on the pavement mob have refused to address the simple point that given racing on the public highway is a very dangerous activity and a serious offence, why should cyclists be above the law?
exactly!
if the car had been driving safely to the conditions the accident wouldn't of happened!