Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Fundie leader suggests murdering Chavez on US TV

siarc said:


Good article and a great quote from Robertson

"Is it right to call for assassination? No, and I apologise for that statement. I spoke in frustration that we should accommodate the man who thinks the US is out to kill him,"

Translates as - because he thinks the US want to kill him the frustration made me think we should kill him.

I think he is mental.
 
please, don't let pb assail us all with his hitler was a commie arguments. it's as painful as his arguments for ID.
 
Chavez calls for Robertson's extradition

Let's face it, Robertson's call for Chavez to be assassinated is nothing short of declaring support for terrorism; and in this case he has called for the state-sponsored murder of the leader of a sovereign state.

Here's a link to an incredibly short article
http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=8&theme=&usrsess=1&id=88144

The Taipei Times has something a little more substantial.

He added he believed that by failing to act against Robertson, the US was "giving protection to a terrorist, who is demanding the assassination of a legitimate president."

Robertson caused a diplomatic stir last Monday when he said on the air that if Chavez believed the US was trying to kill him, "I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it."

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/08/30/2003269725
 
Johnny Canuck2 said:
He didn't make the comments in the UK.

So you think that the UK government would allow into the Muslim preachers who make similar comments about assassinating George Bush?
 
Barking_Mad said:
So you think that the UK government would allow into the Muslim preachers who make similar comments about assassinating George Bush?

Of course he would but he would try and hide behind one or two choice legalistic sounding phrases. Honesty isn't one of JC's qualities.
 
nino_savatte said:
Of course he would but he would try and hide behind one or two choice legalistic sounding phrases. Honesty isn't one of JC's qualities.

Sorry Nino, you have now stopped making any sense whatsoever. This response does not address the previous comment in any way. What do you imagine you are contributing here? You're really on the ball today--I *don't* think.
 
phildwyer said:
Sorry Nino, you have now stopped making any sense whatsoever. This response does not address the previous comment in any way. What do you imagine you are contributing here? You're really on the ball today--I *don't* think.


Makes sense to me.
 
exosculate said:
Makes sense to me.

Really? Perhaps you can help me out then. Who does Nino mean by "he" in the above post: the cleric, Johnny Canuck, the British government or himself? Cos I'm lost, quite frankly.
 
phildwyer said:
Really? Perhaps you can help me out then. Who does Nino mean by "he" in the above post: the cleric, Johnny Canuck, the British government or himself? Cos I'm lost, quite frankly.
JC2? Maybe you need to work on your written comprehension skills.
 
Bob_the_lost said:
JC2? Maybe you need to work on your written comprehension skills.

But JC2 is mentioned in Nino's response--the only person who is. While the only person mentioned in your message to which he's responding is George Bush. But that doesn't seem to make sense. What do *you* think he means?
 
phildwyer said:
But JC2 is mentioned in Nino's response--the only person who is. While the only person mentioned in your message to which he's responding is George Bush. But that doesn't seem to make sense. What do *you* think he means?
Are you *dumb* ? :confused: :rolleyes:

He was adding to Barking_Mads comments.
 
ViolentPanda said:
You're the would-be philosopher. Why don't YOU tell US? :p

For someone who tries to create the impression that he is some sort of intellectual heavyweight, he's rather light on comprehension. :D

In fact, the cunt is stalking me and what this shows is that he has some sort of mental health problem that is going untreated.
 
Back
Top Bottom