Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Full fat milk?

EastEnder said:
AFAIK, the only significant nutritional difference between full fat/semi-skimmed/skimmed is the fat content.

:cool:
sometimes skimmed even has more calcium, if it's fortified with it. i still prefer full fat tho
 
tarannau said:
Come to think of it, if you're after an odourless, non-milky tasting drink in your cornflakes, then why not water?

;)

No need to deride my preferences tarannau!!! I like my milk odorless and tasteless... if u were force fed fresh cow's milk as a child you probably would too!
 
EastEnder said:
I only ever drink skimmed.

And I don't use butter or margarine....!

Shocking.



:eek:

I eat butter! it's not the calorific content of full fat milk that bothers me but the taste, especially if warm. *shudders*
 
rennie said:
No need to deride my preferences tarannau!!! I like my milk odorless and tasteless... if u were force fed fresh cow's milk as a child you probably would too!

I was. I've got over the trauma. And thankfully - unlike my shitty school - I've got a fridge to keep my milk in these days, guaranteeing no nasty warm milk.

But skimmed's a little pointless, like an alcohol and taste free beer. It even contains so much less of the fat-soluble nutrients, such as vitamins A and E, that some companies seek to 'fortify' skimmed milk to bring it up to some kind of nutritional value.

It's not really milky. It's not really that nutritious, it doesn't give hot drinks that cream-like sheen. Where's the fun in that eh - a few dashes of white food colouring in your cuppa would taste much the same...

;)
 
rutabowa said:

I'm not sure what's particularly true anymore. That's the first link that I've seen claim that they're the same in nutritional content - both the Mirror, Telegraph and others all claim massively lower nutritional content - for example see http://www.mirror.co.uk/sexandhealth/slimmingandhealth/tm_objectid=16647589&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=50-mind-blowing-food-facts-name_page.html

I am certain, however, that semi skimmed milk doesn't taste of too much...

:p
 
I always used to get quite turned off by the little grease spots floating around on top of my coffee when my parents had full fat, so really would rather not drink that stuff nowadays, so get skimmed whenever I've got to get some milk.

I'd rather have soy though :D
 
tarannau said:
I'm not sure what's particularly true anymore. That's the first link that I've seen claim that they're the same in nutritional content - both the Mirror, Telegraph and others all claim massively lower nutritional content - for example see http://www.mirror.co.uk/sexandhealth/slimmingandhealth/tm_objectid=16647589&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=50-mind-blowing-food-facts-name_page.html

The Dairy Council

MYTH: Skimmed milk contains less calcium than whole milk

FACT: Calcium is contained in the non-cream portion of milk and so when milk is skimmed all the calcium remains. In fact, pint for pint, skimmed and semi-skimmed contain slightly more than whole. Milk provides almost 40 per cent of the calcium in the British diet.


MYTH: Drinking soya 'milk' is more healthy than cows' milk

FACT: Strictly speaking soya 'milk' is not even milk, it is a drink of plant origin. It is naturally low in calcium, which is why some brands are fortified, and it contains phytate, a strong inhibitor of the absorption of several minerals including iron. Although it is often claimed that soya helps to reduce the rise of cancer, recent studies have indicated that soya could have the opposite effect - and be cancer promoting. The long-term effects of soya consumption by Western populations are at present completely unknown.

They've also got a humongous nutritional analysis thingy that shows quite unambiguously that there's bugger all difference between full-fat/semi-skimmed/skimmed, apart from the fat content......

Or maybe you'd prefer to trust that renowned bastion of veracity, the Mirror....:p
 
I know, shocking isn't it!!! :eek:

I don't trust them for an instant.

I'm going to consult with my spiritual healer, just as soon as he's finished arranging his chakras. After half a dozen incantations and one sacrificed hedgehog, I'm sure we'll have the true answer.

:cool:
 
You drink full fat fat when preparing for winter and hibernation and semi skimmed in the spring and skimmed over the summer months....as nature intended.

You can of course smother yourself in lard all year round. Summer for the tan, winter for insulation!
 
oicur0t said:
You drink full fat fat when preparing for winter and hibernation and semi skimmed in the spring and skimmed over the summer months....as nature intended.
This of course true, in ye-olden day's fat content in milk did vary. However, that wasn't between 4% and 1%, the lowest is about 4% and goes much higher so don't try and sell me skimmed milk as in some way more natural than whole milk even if modern food processing may reduce the difference to a wafer.
 
Sunray said:
Whats happened to the bit at the top of the milk these days.

I remember there was this backlash against all things dairy years ago and people all started drinking semi skimmed milk thinking that they were being healthy while still smoking 100 a day.

In those days, when we had the milk delivered, it had a creamy bit that settled at the top of the milk, with the occasional small bird attacking it. The stuff you get in the shop these days, doesn't.

Why?

Because the RSPB wouldn't like it if the supermarkets kept birds.
 
EastEnder said:
They've also got a humongous nutritional analysis thingy that shows quite unambiguously that there's bugger all difference between full-fat/semi-skimmed/skimmed, apart from the fat content......

Or maybe you'd prefer to trust that renowned bastion of veracity, the Mirror....:p

'Ere. I was all about to believe you, but then I actaully checked that blinking nutritional analysis pdf on the milk website and it clearly shows that semi-skimmed has only half the Vitamin E than full fat has, skimmed milk only having trace quantities of that valuable vitamin.

I never ever claimed that Calcium was lower in skimmed milk than full fat, only that it contained far less 'fat-soluble nutrients, such as vitamins A and E' - check my posts above if you don't believe me.

I don't know; that's the other problem with skimmed milk. Not fit with not tasting of very much at all, the vitamin depleted contents can make you unable to properly concentrate on facts and research...
;) :p
 
tarannau said:
'Ere. I was all about to believe you, but then I actaully checked that blinking nutritional analysis pdf on the milk website and it clearly shows that semi-skimmed has only half the Vitamin E than full fat has, skimmed milk only having trace quantities of that valuable vitamin.
Vitamin E is important, and can be found in a wide variety of food sources, however both zinc & phosphorus are essential for the body to function properly - and they're both more abundant in skimmed milk than in either semi-skimmed or whole.

I'm prepared to accept a suitably contrite, written apology.

:cool:
 
What. So skimmed milk has an eighth of the vitamin E and less than an eight of the vitamin A of full fat milk and you want to start talking about zinc and potassium as a diversion technique. And this after you getting the getting the wrong end of the stick and waffling on about calcium, a point of no contention, first too as well.
<wags finger in condescending manner>

Far be it from me to poo-poo your latest discovery, but skimmed milk only contains a whole mg more zinc, only 25% more than full fat, and only a comparatively minor boost of potassium. An apology from me will certainly not be forthcoming.

Most importantly it still tastes of nothing...


p :p
 
Back
Top Bottom