Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Free England Party Discussion

But where people consider themselves to be English citizens (I use the term citizens in a loose sense, really here it just means 'people') and are not considered to be English by others, there is not a society. There is a part of a society, and a group of unhappy and disenfranchised people.
The truth is, df, that as with any nation-builder, you would need to consciously create Englishness. At the moment, I just don't think it exists, really.

Nation building is seldom a pretty business.
 
All too often, integration is just another term for 'be like us, please'.

Yes to a degree but I think the onus is on the person that moves into a community at the end of the day. I think the host community should obviously accept the person and not stomp on them for being different, but ultimatley if you move somewhere and are completly at odds with the existing community then you do have to ask yourself why you are there.
I think it just comes down to being respectful of your neighbours at the end of the day.
 
I'd say every culture has it's own type of society. Try living abroad and looking back at England and it is glaring obvious. Of course we share many traits with other countries but a myriad of variables in English society are what make it "English" and that includes the sterotypes.. fish and chips anyone :).

Cultures of course evolve and absorb incomers and often fuse the best of their traditions/culture into the larger host culture. You can see this with cuisine for example. Curry somewhat obviously comes to mind.

I use the term 'culture' to refer to the customs practiced by those in a particular society.
 
I think it comes across initially as a bit confused and inconsistent, with a bunch of "free market" policies like medicare, fully privatised education, lower tax on business and also a bunch of more "socialistic" ones.

On a skim of the actual policy document though the latter mostly seem to melt away into neo-liberalish "private sector does it but government funds it" stuff, and there's a big blow of the old-school Tory dog-whistle there as well; tough on crime, put the family first, stop immigration now etc. Section 8 certainly caught my eye, given that not only is it opposed to "any form of discrimination against the ethnic English" (the poor things, so discriminated against) but it seems to want to say "repeal discrimination legislation" but can't quite manage it. I can't think of another actual policy implication from 8.2. Even uses the phrase "political correct madness" (sic).

I was hoping that it wouldn't descend into the usual but it does seem to. Oh well.
 
Thing is, I lived in a very monocultural society for a little bit, and one of the things I like most about Britain is its cultural diversity. I oppose any attempt to limit that diversity by imposition from above.
 
But where people consider themselves to be English citizens (I use the term citizens in a loose sense, really here it just means 'people') and are not considered to be English by others, there is not a society. There is a part of a society, and a group of unhappy and disenfranchised people.
That makes even less sense than your last one, I'm afraid.
 
not only is it opposed to "any form of discrimination against the ethnic English" (the poor things, so discriminated against) but it seems to want to say "repeal discrimination legislation" but can't quite manage it. I can't think of another actual policy implication from 8.2. Even uses the phrase "political correct madness" (sic)..
I didn't read that bit. 'ethnic English'? Get to fuck.
 
I struggle to think of any important cultural difference between the Welsh and the English.

Language is the major one that comes to mind, slang, accent, Welsh literature and history. Of course being neighbours and part of a politcal union for a long time has had an affect upon merging out some of the differences. However I'd say they are still very noticible.

Take England and Scotland and they get greater, and even more so with Ireland. Once you reach non-English speaking nations across the channel then they obviously become even more noticable.
 
I know this point is not new, but the entire history of this island is rife with examples of passive and aggressive influxes of different peoples. With these people came traditions, ideas, culinary influences, language bleed through and all of that stuff.

Any appeal to englishness has to accept that there's no real hard and fast definition for an englishman save his passport details.
 
I think it comes across initially as a bit confused and inconsistent, with a bunch of "free market" policies like medicare, fully privatised education, lower tax on business and also a bunch of more "socialistic" ones.

On a skim of the actual policy document though the latter mostly seem to melt away into neo-liberalish "private sector does it but government funds it" stuff, and there's a big blow of the old-school Tory dog-whistle there as well; tough on crime, put the family first, stop immigration now etc. Section 8 certainly caught my eye, given that not only is it opposed to "any form of discrimination against the ethnic English" (the poor things, so discriminated against) but it seems to want to say "repeal discrimination legislation" but can't quite manage it. I can't think of another actual policy implication from 8.2. Even uses the phrase "political correct madness" (sic).

I was hoping that it wouldn't descend into the usual but it does seem to. Oh well.

Again, that policy document was the opinion of one member who took the time to create a draft of what they thought our manifesto should be. I was under the impression there was a disclaimer to that effect but it may have disappeared in the recent site re-shuffle.
 
I know this point is not new, but the entire history of this island is rife with examples of passive and aggressive influxes of different peoples. With these people came traditions, ideas, culinary influences, language bleed through and all of that stuff.

Any appeal to englishness has to accept that there's no real hard and fast definition for an englishman save his passport details.
A mongrel nation. And all the better for it.:)
 
Again, that policy document was the opinion of one member who took the time to create a draft of what they thought our manifesto should be. I was under the impression there was a disclaimer to that effect but it may have disappeared in the recent site re-shuffle.
Do you recognise such an entity as an 'ethnic Englishman/woman'? If so, how would I recognise one?
 
What are the customs practised by English people that define their 'Englishness' please?

Editor I'm actually fairly surprised you had to ask that? Out of interest do you live in England?

Having said that I think if people had asked me that when I was living in England I would have had to sit and think about it. Many of the things we take for granted or are second thoughts can seem very alient to those not from England/having lived there.
 
What are the customs practised by English people that define their 'Englishness' please?

Whatever the English happen to feel like practising.

This denial of the English an identity is a disastrous idea. Without an identity there is no community. Without a community there is no solidarity. Without solidarity there is nothing.
 
Again, that policy document was the opinion of one member who took the time to create a draft of what they thought our manifesto should be. I was under the impression there was a disclaimer to that effect but it may have disappeared in the recent site re-shuffle.

Mate, if you're going to have a website for a party and publish a policy document on it, you need to make sure that document reflects what your party promotes. Delete it if it doesn't.
 
Language is the major one that comes to mind, slang, accent, Welsh literature and history. Of course being neighbours and part of a politcal union for a long time has had an affect upon merging out some of the differences. However I'd say they are still very noticible.
I would say that a native of Bristol has much more in common linguistically and culturally with a native of Newport than a native of, say, Newcastle.
 
Do you recognise such an entity as an 'ethnic Englishman/woman'? If so, how would I recognise one?

Someone who considers themselves to be an ethnic English person would be an ethnic English person in my book. And don't try and claim that someone from the other side of the world could claim to be English even though their ancestors are all Native American. It's not going to happen.
 
Mate, if you're going to have a website for a party and publish a policy document on it, you need to make sure that document reflects what your party promotes. Delete it if it doesn't.

That would make sense :D
 
I would say that a native of Bristol has much more in common linguistically and culturally with a native of Newport than a native of, say, Newcastle.

I'm not sure I agree with you there to be honest. I would say they have more in common with folks from Somerset/Devon/Gloucestershire, but I think there is a marked difference between England Wales, and hell all the better for it. I've always enjoyed my trips to the West Country and Wales :).
 
Mate, if you're going to have a website for a party and publish a policy document on it, you need to make sure that document reflects what your party promotes. Delete it if it doesn't.

I agree, and I'm going to argue that point strongly when I meet with the National Executive Council in June.
 
Someone who considers themselves to be an ethnic English person would be an ethnic English person in my book. And don't try and claim that someone from the other side of the world could claim to be English even though their ancestors are all Native American. It's not going to happen.
i don't usually quote wikipedia, but in this case, I think the first sentence of their entry on ethnicity is apposite:

An ethnic group is a group of human beings whose members identify with each other, through a common heritage that is real or presumed

(my bold)

The bit I've emboldened is important. If you see yourself as ethnic English but nobody else who sees themselves as ethnic English accepts you, then you're stuffed.
 
i don't usually quote wikipedia, but in this case, I think the first sentence of their entry on ethnicity is apposite:



(my bold)

The bit I've emboldened is important. If you see yourself as ethnic English but nobody else who sees themselves as ethnic English accepts you, then you're stuffed.

Well, yes, that ties into what I was saying earlier.
 
Back
Top Bottom