Fraudster MP Kitty Usher to launch 'consultation' on Housing Benefit fraud, WTf!

[JHE]

People accused of benefit fraud should try the Kitty defence: I needed the extra money to get rid of the Artex. It's dilapidation in my book.


What sort of adult calls herself Kitty, anyway?

 

[ericjarvis]

I suggest you read my posts again. i said nothing like that at all -and the poster i'm replying to didn't offer us postive data based on personally knowing her either. Are you on the right thread?

The rst is just accusing me of making stuff up. Again, not true - i've made nothing up. I've used towo sourced and unquestioned quotes - one direct from the MPs own office. You always get the important details wrong eric - and you've done it a numbe rof times over this issue your own untrue claims about the expenses were already undone on another thread.

I sat down. I picked out the relevant paragraphs from Treelover, prunus, and yourself. Started writing an explanation of why you are simply a blowhard bully who counts on winning arguments by being aggressive and offensive to anyone who questions anything you post. Then I thought, fuck it, you aren't worth the effort. There's no point. You have such a high opinion of your own "reasoning" that no matter how far you've gone off on a flight of fancy using assumptions and extrapolations you are always convinced that if you can claim solid premises then everyone else is always wrong.

I don't know anything much about Kitty Usher, she isn't my MP. However I know enough about the local MPs here that I can be pretty certain I can give some details on most that aren't available from a cursory trawl with Google. As a consequence I am prepared to believe that other posters may know more about other MPs than I am able to find out rapidly. I think it's totally out of order for you to have dismissed prunus's comments as if you become the fount of all knowledge as soon as you've read a couple of web pages and can then airily dismiss any statement by anyone else as if it's worthless.

As for untrue claims about the expenses scandal. In my experience relying on the Torygraph as the arbiter of truth isn't always a smart idea. A good start on how reliable they are can be gleaned by taking some of the current batch of reports, taking the odd line and feeding them into Google, and finding out quite how much of the Torygraph's brand new exclusive revelations were actually in the Times around a year ago.

That's all, you may now have the last word and congratulate yourself on being cleverer than everyone else on the boards because they always stop arguing before you do.