Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Four best online music subscription services compared

editor

hiraethified
Here's an interesting comparison from TechRadar of Spotify, Sky Songs and the rest...

Spotify Premium
Price: £10 per month
Website: www.spotify.com
Spotify costs £9.99 per month for new users, and allows an unlimited amount of ad-free streaming via its excellent desktop application.
Spotify for Windows is stable and fast, and we've never noticed a delay shuffling between tracks on a fast broadband connection. But it's Spotify's mobile option, which allows you to stream over a 3G connection, that really appeals.
In our tests on a Nokia E71, we experienced a few difficulties – Spotify requires a strong 3G connection to stream music reliably. But if you find yourself struggling, you can download up to 3,333 tracks to listen to offline. Not only does this remove the problem of weak 3G connections, it means that you can listen to virtually any track you can think of even if you're underground.
The only problem is that once your subscription expires, your portable music does too – although you can still play it from the application, just as before. But the lack of any real ownership of your music is a shame.


Sky Songs
Price: From £6.50 per month
Website: www.sky.com/songs
Sky Songs offers the secondcheapest basic subscription here at just £6.49 per month. In return you get unlimited use of Sky's browser-based streaming service and 10 music downloads per month.
Alternatively, for £7.99 per month, you can have the same all-you-can-listen-to streaming service and up to 15 tracks to download and keep. It's excellent value for money, and we had no trouble finding the very latest tracks to listen to.
The use of a browser for streaming is a slight annoyance – if a tab crashes and brings down your entire browser, the music stops. Still, the browser-based player is fast, with a negligible delay between choosing a track and playback beginning.
It supports the creation of playlists, which you can save and play from anywhere. You don't get a connected mobile option in return for your subscription, unfortunately, so the only way to take advantage of Sky when you're out and about is to download tracks ahead of time.
Still, in terms of cost-per-download, Sky leads the way.

Napster Unlimited
Price: From £5 per month
Website: www.napster.co.uk
Napster is the grandfather of the online music industry – it was largely responsible for the explosion of illegal file sharing back in the 1990s. Now firmly into its teens, it's growing up and sports a respectable face.
In terms of absolute price it's the cheapest here – you can subscribe for just a fiver per month. In return you get to stream music either through a web browser or via Napster's excellent stand-alone application.
There's even a mobile option, although this only allows you to stream 30 seconds of a song or purchase a track rather than being able to listen all the way through, as with Spotify. Your £5 also gives you five unrestricted MP3 downloads per month – a fair deal for those who'd rather stream music than keep it.
If you'd rather download and keep your music, then Sky Songs offers slightly better value for money per track. But for simply listening to anything from a library of 10 million tracks, Napster is superb value.

eMusic
Price: From £6
Website: www.emusic.co.uk
eMusic is the odd one out this month. It's a subscription service, but you don't actually get to stream music, which feels restrictive after being able to listen to anything in the libraries of Spotify, Napster and Sky Songs.
Instead, eMusic's subscriptions – which start at £5.99 per month – give you 12 tracks per month to download. The packages go all the way up to £24.99, which allows music addicts 75 downloads every 30 days.
The good news is that eMusic is terrific value: even its most expensive option is considerably cheaper than iTunes at just 50p per track. It's also simple – you buy tracks through eMusic's tiny application, and there's no new player to learn because tracks simply play through whatever you already use.
The drawback is label support. If you're a fan of pop music, you should look elsewhere. eMusic doesn't have deals with the major labels, which means that many chart hits are conspicuous by their absence.
For finding new acts and indie music, though, eMusic represents superb value for money.

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/4-best-music-subscription-services-tested-688838
Anyone using any of these services?

I had a 3 month Spotify subscription which was great, but just nt worth sa tenner a month - and the iPhone app is useless because you can't do anything else when you're listening to music.
 
I've been tempted to subscribe to Spotify (being an Android user I don't have the 'one app at a time' issue), but as I'm out in the sticks my 3G connection is intermittent at best.
 
I used to use emusic for a while...

As the review suggested, I found some good stuff on there, but there were lots of gaps in their selection.

Also got annoyed that the best quality they offered at the time was 192 for most stuff and and 160kbs for a few.

Might be different now though.

Mind you, they still don't offer the service in Dubai, so would have to fanny around with my VPN and UK billing address/cards etc if I wanted to go back.

That's the thing I always find most annoying and indeed baffling - the geographical restrictions for licensed music...a definite contributing factor to me downloading some stuff through "unofficial channels"

If Steam can deliver commercial PC games globally, why can't iTunes, eMusic, Amazon et all do the same with music?
 
I have used emusic for a while - in fact I have a grandfathered account with 75 downloads a month for 15 quid iirc, they put up the prices recently after doing some deal with Sony I think.

I think it's a great service - extensive selection of drm free mp3s, good fast downloads, you can download them again any time if you lose them, it has recommendations and reviews and similar artist functions etc. If you're after a lot of major label content it probably isn't for you but I'm not anyway.

No interest in paying for streaming services which either eat 3G and don't let you keep stuff or have crap mobile options in the first place. I'm never ever "buying" drmed audio again, and for that money they don't seem to offer me anything I want.
 
I've been tempted to subscribe to Spotify (being an Android user I don't have the 'one app at a time' issue), but as I'm out in the sticks my 3G connection is intermittent at best.

You can store the songs on the phone so no connection is required for playback.
 
Call me old fashioned, but I like to have control over my music and not being at the whims of a net connection dying or the company going bust/putting up prices. It's taken me a long time to collect, so its backed up over 3 hard disks just in case.
 
I will contemplate Spotify premium when i get my nexus one. Spotify free has pretty much stopped my downloading any sort of music illegally for a good while. However I probably haven't spent £120 on music a year since my teens, so in that respect it does seem a little pricey!
 
Call me old fashioned, but I like to have control over my music and not being at the whims of a net connection dying or the company going bust/putting up prices. It's taken me a long time to collect, so its backed up over 3 hard disks just in case.

Translation: I dont like to pay for music.
 
I thought he was saying the opposite - i.e. that he wants to own physical versions.

That are stored on 3 hard drives?

Edit: ah I might have misread, still though the advantage over the traditional music collection setup feel well worth it imho.
 
I can live without physical versions but I am absolutely not buying anything with DRM in downloads. I've been burnt by old unwise iTunes purchases before - luckily they did move to non DRM AAC but emusic is still cheaper. A streaming service I can see might be a convenient thing if it fits your listening practices, but it really doesn't fit mine, and I know that any music I get from emusic will be usable forever as long as I back it up properly.
 
Translation: I dont like to pay for music.

Well I'd be lying if I said I paid for the whole lot, but I spent a lot on CDs over the years and ripped them all myself to ensure they were high quality 320kbs copies.

editor said:
I thought he was saying the opposite - i.e. that he wants to own physical versions.

I'd love to start a decent vinal collection, but don't have the space to store it and move far to often. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom