Ole
Well-Known Member
And "support for the police" is not the question anyway. It's "support for anarchists/leftists who attack police". They're significantly different questions.
I don't have empirical evidence, like scientific polls determining how sympathetic the British public would be towards anarchists and leftists once they were to start attacking police officers - not to say that such empirical evidence of any degree doesn't exist, I don't know if it does or not - but thankfully it's not the only instrument we have to understand the world we live in, Pickman's Model. I believe fairly straightforward reasoning can lead me to the conclusion I've reached: first, people generally perceive the institution of the police as a legitimate force to maintain order, but much more than that, they view people who attack police as criminals. No poll... it just seems obvious. It's difficult to think of any instance where this hasn't been the case...
If winning public support is paramount, attacking coppers doesn't seem like a good idea at all. It carries with it a massive risk of losing substantial public support, and in my opinion, equally effective political action can usually be taken without committing yourselves to violence against police and shouldering the risk that carries.
In my opinion.
It is a different argument yes and I agree, everything's about circumstances - I'm not endorsing a principled non-violent stance. If it is more effective it is the right thing to do (given that it's justifiable in itself of course).That's a different argument completely though. And it depends on the situation - sometimes the only way to retain public support if not sympathy is to engage in violence.
out of curiosity have you any evidence to support this view?
He says, without waiting for an answer.unlike ole you've got the wit not to make up claims you can't support.
I don't have empirical evidence, like scientific polls determining how sympathetic the British public would be towards anarchists and leftists once they were to start attacking police officers - not to say that such empirical evidence of any degree doesn't exist, I don't know if it does or not - but thankfully it's not the only instrument we have to understand the world we live in, Pickman's Model. I believe fairly straightforward reasoning can lead me to the conclusion I've reached: first, people generally perceive the institution of the police as a legitimate force to maintain order, but much more than that, they view people who attack police as criminals. No poll... it just seems obvious. It's difficult to think of any instance where this hasn't been the case...
If winning public support is paramount, attacking coppers doesn't seem like a good idea at all. It carries with it a massive risk of losing substantial public support, and in my opinion, equally effective political action can usually be taken without committing yourselves to violence against police and shouldering the risk that carries.
In my opinion.