braindancer
not for long
You'll love it...


Good sorry I didn't see the thread earlier. I have had one in addition to several geared bikes since about 2001. Mine is converted from an old 80's tri bike with horizontal drops.I've ordered it![]()

Fixed riding feels very different, especially the pedaling![]()


But I still don't understand *why*. I've nothing against them (so long as you actually have brakes - the brakeless ones are organ donors waiting to happen), but I just don't understand the reason for it. Half decent derailleurs and cassettes don't cost that much, and it's kind of nice to have an option as to what to do with a steep hill even if you do ride in the same gear 95% of the time. Even if you skip the crank gears (I rarely use them myself) and just have 6-7 at the back.
I also understand if it's purely for training, but then keep it on the cycle track, no?
Apparently their better for getting fit on.
There's only really a point in having a front brake too.....


Utter horseshit. Do you even know what you're talking about? It's direct drive in both cases. It's like claiming a 1 speed car would be more mechanically efficient than a 5 speed. (ignoring automatics)gears are less mechanically efficient,
Without even going to the XT range, you can add 8 gears to the rear for under 2kg of weight. Which is less than 4 pints, for comparison. "Lots" more maintenenace? Really? I clean, lube and adjust the gears at the same time as the chain. You do still have a chain, yes? Takes me an hour or two per season.add lots of weight and need lots more maintenance.
ennit lol"but you'd be insane to offroad on a single gear"
hahaha
Utter horseshit. Do you even know what you're talking about? It's direct drive in both cases. It's like claiming a 1 speed car would be more mechanically efficient than a 5 speed. (ignoring automatics)
When cycling from achingly hip Hackney into town in the morning these days it really seems as if nearly half the bikes are fixed. In the last few months I’ve noticed a very rapid increase in the number of riders without brakes. This is all well and good if you’re an experienced rider but a significant proportion of these guys are obviously new to it and are pootling along really slowly with panicked looks on their chops about the potential need to stop.![]()

"but you'd be insane to offroad on a single gear"
hahaha
Utter horseshit. Do you even know what you're talking about? It's direct drive in both cases. It's like claiming a 1 speed car would be more mechanically efficient than a 5 speed. (ignoring automatics)
Without even going to the XT range, you can add 8 gears to the rear for under 2kg of weight. Which is less than 4 pints, for comparison. "Lots" more maintenenace? Really? I clean, lube and adjust the gears at the same time as the chain. You do still have a chain, yes? Takes me an hour or two per season.
Edit: You'd have a lot more maintenance on the gears if you offroaded, but you'd be insane to offroad on a single gear, so I'm assuming that's not the case. Road/track riding is remarkably low on maintenance no matter what the system.
In response to the OP, you don't need a fixed gear bike when you already have one unless you're training for an event where they're a requirement. Whether you'd like one is a different story, but don't kid yourself that it's not about what's fashionable.
hub gears are more efficient but still can't touch fixed for power transfer.With derailleur gears the chain also has to loop through and drive that extra cog at the bottom. I don't think you have to be an expert in physics to reckon that there would be some advantage to getting rid of it.
In response to the OP, you don't need a fixed gear bike when you already have one unless you're training for an event where they're a requirement. Whether you'd like one is a different story, but don't kid yourself that it's not about what's fashionable.
I asked after them after hearing that they're kick-ass at building lactic tolerance 
Fashion and I have not been on speaking terms for some years 
i know cambridge is flat but that sounds like an awful awful piece of advice- one way ticket to tendonitis in the achilles and a pair of fucked knees. riding too high a gear can cause some devastating cumulative injuries if you don't warm up, stretch, warm down- for a round the town bike you're much better off keeping a higher cadence.

argh crispyyou still believe that only mad people ride fixies![]()
i spent a lot of my first cycling years trying to lean over so far around corner that my elbow would scrape. it never actually happened except then i fell off. then i'd scrape elbow AND knee...

Only the top is driving, the rest is taking up slack, I know when mine is inefficient, I can hear it.
More importantly the body works most efficiently when working in a zone, between heart rate targets and at a fixed cadence. This efficiency more than makes up for any loss in the machinery. Hence all cycling away from a fixed velodrome is geared.
There does not seem a case, velodromes, maintenance and mind games aside, for fixed at all.
However a bikes a bike and it's all cycling even when kids point and laugh when i'm on my Brompton.
Have you ever ridden one?
Sounds a bit like the final hill of my commute - I get over 30 just freewheeling (No, but i've a frame etc. that would convert. Problem is, i live at the top of a hill and will have to work out which gear is the lowest I can cope with. Then i wonder what it would be like on the downhill which can be a 35mph one when i'm pushing, would my legs go round quick enough?
) down it, a few extra mph if I use my 48T-11T-26 inch.