Let me give a slightly more considered opinion on fixed/single. I'm sure it's not a novel one
When I sampled riding a singlespeed, I totally understood the attraction. There's no lag, no slack, no mind-fuss over which gear to pick and the bike was lighter and less fussy looking than my hybrid, even though it had a steel frame. I could have happily rode it round and round in circles till my legs fell off
However, when riding it, I just didn't want to stop. The feeling at cruise was just too good, and I knew I'd have some standing up to do if I wanted to get back up there again. Now, most of my cycling is stop-start on busy city roads. I often need to burst from a standstill to eg. get infront of a lorry at a junction. I also, sorry to say, see quite a few singlespeed riders taking unneccesary risks or riding through pedestrians crossing - presumably for just those reasons at the start of this paragraph.
The comparison from single to fixed is not as big as that from geared to single, but the one major problem I see is having no control over where your cranks are. Although riding close to the kerb is something I try hard not to do, sometimes it's unavoidable, and sometimes an emergency might force me too. On a fixed, your effective kerb-level width is greater. I've never seen it happen, but what happens if you bash the kerb with the crank at moderate speed?