Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

FIT Watch @ Climate Camp

This day and age, sitting down on a road is considered terrorism. Or something.
 
untethered said:
It's considered being a bally nuisance.
Curse those bally Suffragettes causing inconveniences for the chaps, eh? In fact, maybe all forms of protest should be outlawed now so that no one ever has to suffer any kind of inconvenience (unless it's being dished out by the state or big corporations, of course).
 
editor said:
Curse those bally Suffragettes causing inconveniences for the chaps, eh? In fact, maybe all forms of protest should be outlawed now so that no one ever has to suffer any kind of inconvenience (unless it's being dished out by the state or big corporations, of course).

Not at all. You just need to know where the line is drawn, that's all.

I'm right behind the climate camp just as long as they keep it legal and decent.
 
untethered said:
I'm right behind the climate camp just as long as they keep it legal and decent.


They have fallen at the first hurdle there then. They have illegally occupied private land.
 
chymaera said:
They have fallen at the first hurdle there then. They have illegally occupied private land.

Yes, I'm a bit concerned about that. Does anyone know why they didn't just get permission or rent some land? It would have saved a lot of bother.
 
untethered said:
Not at all. You just need to know where the line is drawn, that's all.

I'm right behind the climate camp just as long as they keep it legal and decent.


what is going on on these boards ? i dont come here often , but when did clowns like this one / Chymera / Detective boy get to spout this kind of crap without anyone batting an eyelid ?

"Legal and decent" ????????????????????
 
cantsin said:
what is going on on these boards ? i dont come here often , but when clowns like this one / Chymera / Detective Pig boy get to spout this kind of crap without anyone batting an eyelid ?

"Legal and decent" ????????????????????

Attack him/them then monty
 
untethered said:
Yes, I'm a bit concerned about that. Does anyone know why they didn't just get permission or rent some land? It would have saved a lot of bother.

The land they occupied is apparently that going to be used for the airport expansion they protest against--therefore entirely appropriate.
 
cantsin said:
"Legal and decent" ????????????????????

Peaceful protest has a long an honourable history in Britain, as soon as protesters break the law they lose support from the general public.
Whilst millions of ordinary people fill up cheap charter flights to get two weeks cheap holiday abroad the demand for more flights will not stop.
Lobbying government to put the same tax on jet fuel as there is on petrol would be somewhat more sensible than a load of:-"crusties, dole scroungers and the great unwashed." camping in a field. (Those descriptions are from other forums by the way.)
 
untethered said:
Yes, I'm a bit concerned about that. Does anyone know why they didn't just get permission or rent some land?
Oh yes. That would work.

Protesters: "Hi. We'd like to hire some land for a protest"
Landowner: "Sorry, the police have told me not to help you in any way at all"
Protesters: "OK, We'll just not bother and give up then"
 
Larry O'Hara said:
The land they occupied is apparently that going to be used for the airport expansion they protest against--therefore entirely appropriate.

I suppose they'll be doing less damage than an expanded airport, but it's still hardly the right way to be going about things.

Nonetheless, I'm considering popping in and seeing what it's all about. More conservatives should get involved with these things if we're to have a future at all.
 
chymaera said:
Lobbying government to put the same tax on jet fuel as there is on petrol would be somewhat more sensible than a load of:-"crusties, dole scroungers and the great unwashed." camping in a field. (Those descriptions are from other forums by the way.)
Which forums are these please?

And why do you keep quoting the irrelevant witterings of these unnamed people? Is it because you agree with the sentiments?
 
editor said:
Oh yes. That would work.

Protesters: "Hi. We'd like to hire some land for a protest"
Landowner: "Sorry, the police have told me not to help you in any way at all"
Protesters: "OK, We'll just not bother and give up then"

Someone must know a friendly landowner. It really isn't that hard.
 
editor said:
You're living in cloud cuckoo land, chum.

I think you are if you believe that no landowner could be sympathetic to such a thing. I'm sure a great deal are. In fact, I know they are. Just not anyone locally that I know of.
 
editor said:
Which forums are these please?

And why do you keep quoting the irrelevant witterings of these unnamed people? Is it because you agree with the sentiments?


Looking at the News items from the encampment the protestors appear to, in the main, fit the stereotypes, with the usual American spokespersons just to annoy the general public even more.
 
butchersapron said:
"crusties, dole scroungers and the great unwashed."

you mean?

Yes. (Unless the TV news gatherers are doing closeup of them deliberately to make it look as if they are the only people there.)
 
Back
Top Bottom