Thora
Differently Ethical
He's my favourite one.smokedout said:agreed, he followed me to the offie on mayday
He's my favourite one.smokedout said:agreed, he followed me to the offie on mayday
In my experience of public disorder including the deployment of such units, arrests are often not for s.5 POA offences (though that may end up as the charge) but for the more serious offences of s.4 (fear or provocation of violence) or s.3 (affray) or assaults / obstruction of police.winjer said:Having witnessed a dozen arrests for it in the past week, this 'good practice' does not extend to Oracle and TSG units.
I didn't say they had no powers. I pointed out that many of the members of FIT teams (in fact the central ones to the teams purpose) are, in fact, civilian photographers and, as such, they do not have the powers of constables. And I pointed out that their role was not one of using force, but of gathering intelligence. If, whilst doing so, they are obstructed / attacked, the officers will, of course, use such powers to use force as they have ... but usually simply to withdraw safely unless a decision has been made to support the FIT team with other units (such as the TSG proper). I have simply been making the point that people seem to be attributing all sorts of activities to "FIT teams", when much of it is done by other units.LX365 said:If FIT teams have no powers, would you care to explain the huge numbers of assaults an arrests i have experienced and witnessed as a result of their actions.
I have already said that if that is the case then those people should sue. Known activists are targetted, sure (that is the whole point, after all). But the activities (which involve a clear interference with the right to privacy) must be proportionate and necessary otherwise the courts will find them unlawful.LX365 said:They are they to intimidate and harass people.
Fine. If that's what you think, great. Live in your own little world where you are all-seeing and all-knowing. Bye.winjer said:You are under the misapprehension that sitting in an armchair reading The Job makes you an expert on the real world activities of FIT teams.
detective-boy said:I have already said that if that is the case then those people should sue. Known activists are targetted, sure (that is the whole point, after all). But the activities (which involve a clear interference with the right to privacy) must be proportionate and necessary otherwise the courts will find them unlawful.
detective-boy said:my comments are based on my experience of working with FIT teams as a bronze commander
detective-boy said:I have already said that if that is the case then those people should sue. Known activists are targetted, sure (that is the whole point, after all). But the activities (which involve a clear interference with the right to privacy) must be proportionate and necessary otherwise the courts will find them unlawful.

lightsoutlondon said:I remember D-B writing a while ago that people should sue/complain about (aggressive/inappropriate) police behaviour at things like demos, protest marches and football matches. I said it then and I'll say it again - being a police officer really really does distort one's view of reality.
D-B : why do your colleagues remove their numbers and badges of rank when policing mass-attended events etc? I've even seen officers [in a certain sea port] remove their numbers on Friday and Saturday nights when rattling around town.

lightsoutlondon said:I was kind of being rhetorical, but yet allowing enough yardage for D-B to use lots of these -
![]()

THey are long overdue a serious taste of their own medicine and I hope the Anarchist death squad force will give them a good hiding


So what do you suggest, then? The ONLY way of policing the police is if people persistently complain of unlawful and inappropriate behaviour.lightsoutlondon said:I remember D-B writing a while ago that people should sue/complain about (aggressive/inappropriate) police behaviour at things like demos, protest marches and football matches.
), suggest a viable alternative.detective-boy said:So what do you suggest, then? The ONLY way of policing the police is if people persistently complain of unlawful and inappropriate behaviour.
I fail to see why you ridicule such a view. Don't just slag it off (I know this is a difficult concept for "activists" ...), suggest a viable alternative.
Hardly a wise suggestion, bearing in mind a passer-by hasn't got any idea what the "hassle" has originated from. Observing police behaviour, witnessing what has happened and questioning / reporting it later, fine.LX365 said:It probably should be expanded to some kind of Police Watch which encourages people to intervene everytime they see cops hassling someone.
detective-boy said:Hardly a wise suggestion, bearing in mind a passer-by hasn't got any idea what the "hassle" has originated from. Observing police behaviour, witnessing what has happened and questioning / reporting it later, fine.
Intervening in something you know nothing about - no, a recipe for disaster.
What you did sounds OK.Miss-Shelf said:It can be lonely and embarrassing to be stopped in the street for no good reason.
detective-boy said:I fail to see why you ridicule such a view. Don't just slag it off (I know this is a difficult concept for "activists" ...), suggest a viable alternative.
